MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

What Does Gail Berman Really Represent?

Seems to me that everyone is getting the Gail Berman to Paramount story all wrong when they worry that Donald De Line is the target. I would suggest that it should make Rob Friedman a lot more nervous than De Line.

Tom Freston is no idiot and he knows that Gail Berman is not a film production executive. But the evolution of The New Paramount is one of integration… as all the Split Viacom stories have pointed out, Freston and the feature side is keeping the key cable nets. This is to make the machine run an a truly synergistic machine. And as most people who have worked in the Paramount/MTV/Nickelodeon nexus will tell you, the leaders of the TV nets are angry and hurt and ready to get payback as their power increases. Who will put a stop to that?

Gail Berman.

In his first few months, Freston has shown, by both action and inaction (aka not firing everyone), that he is interested in letting people who can do their jobs do their jobs without micromanaging. He has also shown that he is very interested in macromanaging.

Someone has to be the point person in the integration of all the divisions. Brad Grey will be busy, he hopes, making movies. Dealing with the personalities of all the nets is a full time job… too much for one leader, especially as the effort is to break new ground.

Who is the odd man out? It’s not De Line, though that may happen in the future. It’s Rob Friedman, whose job responsibilities have grown wide and far and is, you might notice, never mentioned by anyone regarding Paramount these days. With Grey and Berman, there is not an “appropriate” level for Friedman to land. And there is a real chance that his exit has already been determined, preceding the determination that they needed to go find someone of Berman’s level to lieutenant Grey.

Could Friedman be on his way to Disney as the hands on chief of the New Miramax? The deafening silence around that job lately… a job that Disney has to be itching to move forward with… suggests that someone might already be on tap. Rob Friedman would not be the expected choice, but as I have written before, the Mouse House seems to be looking to make New Miramax into a New Line/Searchlight combo, ultimately supplanting the slowed down Touchstone label, and not into an arthouse division.

And just worth noting, there seem to be three high end exec jobs hiring inside at least two studios as we speak. One is definitely at one of the studios in this story. Another is a bit more of a mystery. But Paramount, Fox and New Miramax are all in play in a lot of roles in town…

I personally believe that the Paramount team in place has the summer to prove themselves. But the Gail Berman move suggests that someone jumped or was pushed before that period came up. And the only job out there that high on the food chain, although many feel it is a fool’s errand, is the New Miramax role, which would be an interesting choice for a studio guy who has not had the chance to really lead the creative side. As for the rest of Paramount, $175 million for The Longest Yard and $8 million for Mad Hot Ballroom are targets that could change a lot of lives, whether met or not. (Clarification: These are rough domestic box office targets that represent job-saving success in each case, not the cost of each film.)

But hey… I’m just a guy blogging in Bermuda… what do I know?

Be Sociable, Share!

24 Responses to “What Does Gail Berman Really Represent?”

  1. Arash says:

    David is wrong the longest yard cost 85 million not 175 million, the War of the worlds cost 200

  2. Spam Dooley says:

    Hey
    You don’t know
    1- Mark Gill left Warner INdependent
    2- Deluca met with Cook and Nina about New Miramax and was offered green light ability
    3- Deline was fired today

  3. bicycle bob says:

    hey dooley we all missed ya. did the psych center let out early today?

  4. David Poland says:

    gross targets, not costs

  5. David Poland says:

    If that’s true, Spam, I guess you were wrong about the De Luca thing when I wrote it the last time… or is it this time… or is it…

  6. Terence D says:

    He’ll never admit he was wrong about that.

  7. Spam Dooley says:

    They offered Mike Miramax but reporting to Nina.
    He said no.
    Then they offered it again with greenlight.
    He met with them out of courtesy.
    He is still gonna stay at Sony.
    So I guess I wasn’t wrong.
    Sorry, David, that you have to join the tards like Bob- just because you don’t have the information doesn’t make you MUCH less of a man.

  8. bicycle bob says:

    dooley is the janitor in delucas building. he goes thru the garbage

  9. Mark says:

    I see Spammer with his ear stuck to door. Kinda like Leno when he went after the Tonight Show. You can come out of the closet now, Spammer.

  10. David Poland says:

    S.D. – You have it wrong. But thanks for the muscularity.

  11. Spam Dooley says:

    I have WHAT wrong?
    They did offer it to Mike
    With Greenlight
    and he met
    and declined
    so what do I have wrong exactly?
    Ahhh the arrogance of ignorance.

  12. bicycle bob says:

    u use the name spam dooley and u talk about ignorance and arrogance? u say u have inside info and u know. then say who u are. u don’t see dave running and hiding.

  13. Spam Dooley says:

    A loser called “bicycle bob” has told me (in very bad writing) to use my real name.
    Uh huh.
    I am whoever you say I am
    If I wasn’t, then why would I say I am?
    It is not arrogance to accept the fact that I know more than you.

  14. bicycle bob says:

    this is my real name and i don’t profess to have inside sources and knowledge of the comings and goings of exec’s. u think ur better than dave. then start a website. lets go “spam”. maybe u should learn grammar first, big guy.

  15. Joe Leydon says:

    Wait a minute: You mean to say you have an American Express card that has “Bicycle Bob” listed as name of customer?

  16. Terence D says:

    Why you so bitter at David Poland? You have to try and correct his every item, Mr Spam.

  17. bicycle bob says:

    yea its on my drivers license and military id too

  18. Mark says:

    The Spammer must be Jeffrey Wells. He’s in constant competition with Dave.

  19. Joe Leydon says:

    I’m trying to imagine Bob in his combat fatigues, with a nametag badge that reads: “Bicycle Bob.” I’ll bet THAT would inspire shock and awe.

  20. Spam Dooley says:

    I am not Jeff Wells, although he is a great man.
    I do not correct Dave always, only when he is wrong.
    I think Dave rocks, actually.
    Bicycle Bob- you HAVE a military id and yet you are here when there are still babies to kill in Asian countries? I do not understand?

  21. DP says:

    I have no problem being corrected. But I also have it on excellent authority that M.D. was never offered the green light…
    And for the record, I don’t really think that Jeff & I are working the same room anymore… not for a while. I don’t mean that as a judgment, but as a functional fact. I wish him well in all of his future endeavors.

  22. Spam Dooley says:

    Dave
    I am trying to help you….
    MD passed
    They said why
    He said no green light
    They offered it
    He said no any ways
    This happened, whether Klady told you it did or not

  23. Spam Dooley says:

    I am an idiot..
    Yep.
    😉

  24. David Poland says:

    Do you really think Klady tells me anything?

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon