MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Cities as narrative: what early films tell us

Filmmaker Patrick Keiller, whose marvelous London and Robinson in Space are loving landscape studies of latterday England, muses on ‘motion’ pictures in the Guardian: “Much of what has happened to cities since 1900 can be seen in terms of technological transformation. In the UK, most of us live longer and are wealthier and more mobile than our predecessors, but the built environment, largely unimproved by automation, appears problematic… Films of the early 1900s offer glimpses of comparable landscapes: there are three Mitchell and Kenyon films that together make up a seven-minute tram ride through the centre of Nottingham, a continuous virtual cityscape more extensive than any I can recall elsewhere in UK cinema. What do these films mean for us? One can imagine the symbiosis of electric tram and cine-camera as a harbinger (like the “dragon sandstrewer” in ‘Ulysses,’ or the tram that knocked down Gaud�) of modernity, of fragmentation, after whose passing nothing was ever the same again. Film space was itself fragmented during the political, economic and artistic turmoil of the years around 1910—but film space was always virtual space, and early films seem to have become, suddenly, very topical: documents of a transformation of the kind we are living through today. They also exemplify what seems to me the most enduring attraction of the cinema, which is that it offers a way to visit other times, other worlds. Cities are increasingly seen as processes structured in time. In films we can explore the spaces of the past in order to anticipate the spaces of the future.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon