MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Reframer: Sunday LA Times logs blog

In the Sunday LA Times’ Calendar, Rachel Abramowitz writes a long takeout on Defamer’s Mark Lisanti, luxuriating in “hip, edgy” words like “flick”: “It’s almost exactly like crack addiction,” says the affable 31-year-old from his command station, a Sony computer in his home office — a modest Los Feliz apartment. He doesn’t have air conditioning or any pictures on the wall of his office save for a black-and-white publicity still of Ralph Macchio in the forgotten 1980s flick Crossroads. He does, however, have a site meter on his computer that shows him how many page views he’s getting… “I check it all the time. Any given hour if you ask me how many page views I’ve had in the last hour, I could probably tell you. That’s how our performance is benchmarked, so it turns us into crack-addicted McMonkeys.” … According to Technorati… Defamer was recently the 69th most popular blog out of an estimated 14 million blogs worldwide.” Straining to make Lisanti seem—slightly icky?—Abramowitz writes: He’s wearing a T-shirt and jeans and the slightly grubby sheen of someone who’s just spent the entire day inside blogging… In his short career… Lisanti has posted about 3,800 items — about 12 a day, not including weekends. He says that if an item lies in his inbox, or his consciousness, for more than 6 hours, then it’s usually too old to get on the blog. “Who’s going to want to hear about 6 hours ago?” he posits, much like in another era when Hamlet asked “to be or not to be?” [More heavy lifting at the link.]

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon