MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

Kaus On Goldstein

Quoting Kaus’ entire citation
That’s how I feel about sex! The LAT’s Patrick Goldstein attacks Oscar prediction blogging, then produces the Buried Weasel Graf of the Week:
Full disclosure: I write an Oscar prediction column too, but I do it once a year, not 47 times a week.
Goldstein adds, “without getting into the Academy Award prediction business full-time, I may be doing an Oscar podcast in the near future too.” … That’s OK. Go ahead, do it full-time! As long as you let us know you’d really rather “wrestle with questions about what our movies say about America today.” God help us.
… P.S.: Hollywood is an isolated subculture populated by quirky egomaniacs, and movies have long lead times. They are lousy barometers of “America today.” Indeed, wrestling with “what movies say about America today” is usually just a disingenuous, intellectually flattering, week-in-reviewish way of writing about glamorous stars and directors and attracting lucrative movie ads. At least Oscar handicappers are open and straightforward about what they’re doing. … 5:55 P.M.

Be Sociable, Share!

11 Responses to “Kaus On Goldstein”

  1. BluStealer says:

    Talk about a self important writer. Trying to disparage DP even as he writes about his Oscar column. Maybe deep down he knows he can’t compete with Dave on it.

  2. Bruce says:

    I’d hate the prediction game too if I picked a turkey like Jarhead.

  3. Terence D says:

    Goldstein seems to hate “the oscar prediction” thing yet can’t help himself from trying to do it. So he has to take a few shots at the leader of the industry along the way. Childish, immature. For sure. Seen right thru? Yes.

  4. Mark Ziegler says:

    What’s wrong with doing a prediction column all year long? Obviously, there is a strong market for it.

  5. jeffmcm says:

    That last paragraph is a pretty weak rationalization for being lazy and intellectually undemanding. It’s okay to ignore “America today” because everyone _else_ is a self-centered celebrity chaser. Might as well report on box office numbers.

  6. jeffmcm says:

    Not Mark’s paragraph…the one up top.

  7. ManWithNoName says:

    I generally read a lot about the industry. Does it mean anything that I have never once heard of Patrick Goldstein in my life until Dave’s column, but visit MCN and THB every day??

  8. joefitz84 says:

    Saying everyone is ” a self centered media chaser” is just a weak generalization. I’m sure if this Goldstein guy just wrote on what he wanted to everyday(like Dave does) he wouldn’t be pissy and have to worry about anything.
    What is stopping him from writing about what he wants to?

  9. Richard Nash says:

    Goldstein is just proving himself to be a hack who is scared of playing in a new arena with new rules.

  10. KamikazeCamelV2.0 says:

    “At least Oscar handicappers are open and straightforward about what they’re doing.”
    And that’s what this guy doesn’t understand. We like it, it’s fun. Why shouldn’t we be allowed to obsess over whether Keira Knightley will or won’t get nominated. Or whether Munich will or won’t win Best Picture. Or whether Woody Allen’s Match Point is or isn’t the big return.
    It’s fun. And it also adds something to movie watching. It really does make me at least pay more attention to subtle things.

  11. Chucky in Jersey says:

    Oscar handicappers are hacks with nothing better to do.
    Last month linked to a story [from Canada] about the Oscar Jinx. Google for Oscar jinx — the story may still be around.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon