April 25, 2024
The Hot Blog
amit on: Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
Christian on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: Review: Marriage Story (spoilers only in the broadest sense)
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
YancySkancy on: Review: Little Women (no spoilers)
Hcat on: Why You Should Be Afraid Of The End Of The Paramount Decree
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: I Should Be Doing Box Office
Review: Little Women (no spoilers)
Why You Should Be Afraid Of The End Of The Paramount Decree
Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
Review: Marriage Story (spoilers only in the broadest sense)
see all »
[twitter-widget username="DavidPoland" hiderss="true" hidereplies="true" hidefrom="true" items="3" showts="60" title=" " targetBlank="true"][twitter-widget username="MCNTweets" hiderss="true" hidereplies="true" hidefrom="true" items="3" showts="60" title=" " targetBlank="true"]
Quote Unquotesee all »
It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” â some novel, you know?
So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.
And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it â I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.
There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.
I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury â he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” â and I’d forgot who he was.
So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging â I was with her at that moment â she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.
But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy namedâ” “Yeah, sure â you want his phone number?”
My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher
“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that Iâm on the phone with you now, after all thatâs been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didnât seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. Thereâs not a case of that. He wasnât using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had â if that were what the accusation involved â the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. Iâm not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, âYou know, itâs not this, itâs thatâ? Because â let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, thatâs what it lacked. Thatâs what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.
~ David Simon
It should be noted that the only true ‘blockbuster’ Spielberg has directed in the SKG era was War of the Worlds. And even that was hardly a popcorn movie. He doesn’t seem interested anymore in making movies solely for profit. Though he knows the terrain well enough that he can still pull $100-million out of smaller, edgier fare. His films will continue to be profitable, but I would be surprised to see him chasing after the big one again.
I’ll bet him making the decision of turning down Harry Potter and Spiderman will be seen as his lack of interest in blockbusters for the rest of his career. I’m not saying he’s the “right” director for those movies, but each of those would have been a personal fortune for him had he said yes.
And I don’t think he wants to make Indy IV anymore. He might reluctantly do it, but I don’t think his heart would be in it.
Most aspiring filmmakers, like myself, have a love/hate relationship with Senor Spielberg. We all wish he keeps doing great things.
You have to pay for talent. And Spielberg is certainly worth the investment.
My thought back when they created Dreamworks was that Spielberg would concentrate everything he did with that company. And that hasn’t been the case.
I’m just stoked he loves to work. What movie lover can complain about his output lately?
Dreamworks needed a studio lot. They should have realized that from Day 1.
^ They did. That’s why they were deeply involved in the failed Playa Del Rey development.
They should have had it secured before they started. Would have cured a lot of ills for them.
I don’t disagree.
Spielberg. The man is an industry.
Stvn Splbrg did more than “bring Mimi Leder to film”. She was the director for the first DreamWorks release, “The Peacemaker”, back in the fall of ’97.
Two corrections:
(1) Steve Ross became co-chairman of the merged Time Warner in 1989 when Warner Communications merged with Time Inc. He died in 1991.
(2) “Capote” was released by Sony Pictures Classics because United Artists’ parent company (MGM) was acquired by Sony.
Bringing Mimi Leder was a good thing?
Well, yeah, if you believe in the concept of “Pay It Forward.” đ
We’ll know someone has succeeded Spielberg when this article is written about them.
I’m not sure what you are correcting, Chucky.
According to where I found it, he died where I wrote. But willing to concede and will check again. Still, he was WB in the Spielberg period.
I know why SPC has Capote, but that was kind of the point.
According to Wikipedia, Steve Ross died in 1992. You’re both wrong, ha ha ha.
I forgot where Chucky was the editor. Ha.
Spielberg is the best “known” director today? Are you saying that there’s someone you think is better than few know of? Who?
Well, who is better than Spielberg working today?
David Lean? He’s unavailable.
At the present time, there are quite a few directors bringing out better work. He doesn’t seem to have a groove right now.
How Spielberg Got His Groove Back will be a box office hit.