MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

Oscar Contest

You can find it on the cover of MCN… good prizes…

Be Sociable, Share!

14 Responses to “Oscar Contest”

  1. KamikazeCamelV2.0 says:

    lol, are non-Americans eligable? I voted, but I doubt I’m even allowed.

  2. joefitz84 says:

    Prizes are goooood.

  3. Josh says:

    I’d be lucky to get two of them right. I’m so off on these contests. It’s the pressure!

  4. EDouglas says:

    Grand Prize should have been a “fishing trip” with David Poland! 🙂

  5. waterbucket says:

    Josh, buddy, just pick Brokeback and you’re sure to have 1 right. I actually write down Brokeback for all 5 options. Obsessed? Not me.

  6. EDouglas says:

    Grand Prize should have been a “fishing trip” with David Poland! 🙂

  7. EDouglas says:

    ( did that happen? sorry about that)

  8. Crow T Robot says:

    Come on, Edouglas, what makes you think DP might even be gay?
    It’s not like he obsesses over broadway musicals to screen like Phantom and Producers and Dreamgirls…
    oh wait a minute…
    (love ya Dave!)

  9. waterbucket says:

    Oooh, “fishing trip” with David Poland, dare I say “barf”???
    Hehe, kidding, Dave. For a man of almost 70 years of age, you’re a fox.

  10. EDouglas says:

    Wait…who said anything about David being gay?
    I just thought it would be fun to go fishing! Catch a few trout, fry ’em up with some baked beans… 🙂
    Since that doesn’t seem to work, how about a trip to visit all of the cities featured in Munich for anyone who gets every single nomination, right?

  11. Lota says:

    Dave’s almost 70?! Dave’s gay?!
    For goodness sake the things one learns on the internet.
    Dave sure gets around. He’s made numerous involuntary appearances on “My Baby’s Daddy” too.
    By the way…you’re late with Junior’s Support this month, Dave ( maybe we should just switch over to direct deposit).

  12. waterbucket says:

    Lota, that’s just the beginning for our favorite gal, I mean, guy.
    Did you know that Dave reads only the NY Post and also eats at Arby’s? God, the horrendous things that that man does! =]

  13. Bruce says:

    I’d take some dvd’s. Because I’m winning.

  14. joefitz84 says:

    Arby’s. That just hurts my tummy thinking about it.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon