MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Wes Studi wants his cut: The New World

new_world_farrell_kilcher98765k.jpgWhile only a few folks have seen the re-edited version of The New World, Indian Country Today’s Jennifer Hemmingsen is not impressed. “The melodrama is thick, the internal monologues are endless and the soap operatic overuse of the thousand-yard stare is absolutely maddening… The story is tired… It’s not really a love story… With Smith playing the colonizer and Pocahontas the ”good Indian,” it’s actually a metaphor reinforcing the tragic inevitability of the conquering of America—a story we’ve heard too often already… ”It’s not my cup of tea,” said Cherokee actor and activist Wes Studi, who plays Opechancanough in the film. Studi, who is also a spokesman for the Indigenous Language Institute, said he got involved… because of the original script (the final cut of the movie is missing most of his character’s development) and the historical research that went into it. The production team hired language expert Blair Rudes to research the indigenous language and use it for much of the film’s Native dialogue. The resulting lexicon is being used by the Pamunkee trib [but] it wasn’t much used by [the filmmakers]. ”I’m a bit disappointed that so much of that reintroduced language wasn’t used in the film,” Studi said… What will it take to write a new story about the ”new world”? A different director? Another 400 years? ”What it would take is for me to edit it,” Studi said.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon