MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Hand In The Internet Culture Cookie Jar

By way of LA Observed, I ran into this story about Traditional Media defender turned LA Times blogger Matthew Hiltzik getting caught positng anonymous comments to other blogs, breaking LA Times ethics rules. The paper has shut down his Hiltzik’s blog – where the issue was debated here – for now.
Of course, anonymity and hidden motives have been an issue here at The Hot Blog, though it seems to have subsided after one participant was outed as many participants thanks to the dogged efforts of some other participants.
Hiltzik is, generally, no better and no worse than most people who wander around the web under fake monikers. But as a journalist – and certainly as a journalist who endlessly claimed the moral hghgound versus the low ground that the internet and blogs allegedly held – his standards should have been higher. Ironically, I would imagine that the arrrogance of Traditional Media and the pressure of believing that his opinion meant more than that of others, as well as the cowardice of wanting to mouth off publicly in ways he could only do over cocktails in the real work, was his downfall.
This is not like Jayson Blair. But it is a landmark in the evolution of the media species.

Be Sociable, Share!

8 Responses to “Hand In The Internet Culture Cookie Jar”

  1. Wrecktum says:

    He used to post here as bicycle bob, joefitz84 and Terence D.

  2. Even the way it was reported as a David versus Goliath thing, shows that the “mainstream media” still doesn’t understand that a corner has already been turned.
    The priesthood is already over, it’s just the beginning of the practical outworking of that reality.

  3. KamikazeCamelV2.0 says:

    That’s funny. Reminds me of when Sony made up that critic to advertise The Animal and A Knight’s Tale.
    BTW, Gotta say that I didn’t like “The Proposition” all that much when I saw it in the cinema many months ago. I couldn’t see so far into it as you did, and the extremely graphic (at times) violence was distracting (even if it was realistically appropriate). I much prefered Hillcoat and Cave’s “Ghosts… Of the Civil Dead”

  4. EDouglas says:

    I’ll openly admit that I’ve used pseudonyms to post to message boards (not this one)…and my editor knows it… but usually I use it to make fun of myself rather than to support something I’ve said.

  5. Crow T Robot says:

    I hear ya, EDouglas… sometimes playing fair is more important than having fun…
    I mean you don’t see those assholes Premadator and Scooba Steve around here anymore. 🙂

  6. jeffmcm says:

    So over the last year, this blog has actually only had, like six regular contributors?

  7. KamikazeCamelV2.0 says:

    We rock

  8. bigredjet says:

    You made a mistake in your blog.
    Michael Hiltzik is the LA Times reporter
    Matthew Hiltzik is the president/CEO of Freud Communications, a pr firm in NYC

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon