MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Something a little brutal: Olivier Assayas goes Clean

In the NY Times, Charles Taylor admires Olivier Assayas admiring his own beautifully jumpy new movie, Clean and his ex, Maggie Cheung. Making with the odd metaphor, Taylor writes, “To watch Ms. Cheung’s performance is to see someone who, as Garbo did, uses the camera as though it were radio transmitter, trusting it to pick up the inchoate moods that move across her face. That talent dovetails with Mr. Assayas’s carefully chosen music… several songs composed by Dean Wareham, late of the band Luna and David Roback, late of Mazzy Star, and sung by Ms. Cheung in a style both wafting and grounded…. Mr. Assayas said that Clean was the closest he had come to the style he wishes for his films. maggiecleanpalm89679.jpg“In terms of camerawork, editing, in terms of the way they interact with the characters, in terms of closeness to the human material… but also, at the same time, in terms of brushstrokes, in terms of an abstract visual energy that would connect with the emotions, I really got hold of something I had been looking for in a couple of films.” A movie, Assayas tells Taylor, “has to leave things open up to a certain level so that somehow the viewer has some space within the film… I think that it’s important to understand, intuitively understand, what you are doing… But when you are doing it you must follow instinct. There has to be a certain level of risk, creating images, characters, emotions, it involves something a little brutal. You must be prepared to go in areas where you lose control… There’s such a broad way of representing the world, and specifically representing a world that has become so complex with totally different …articulations…. I like the adventure of making films… And the adventure of making films has to do with the capacity you have of listening to your guts.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon