MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

A Filmmaker Responds… Wildly

This came in from the FilmMonthly.com website.
Apparently, they reviewed a film called Buddha Wild … I have never heard of it before… and they didn’t much like it.
And then the filmmaker, Anna Wilding, responded.
You can see her e-mail on the page. And Del Harvey, an editor on the site says, “When we posted the review, we were bombarded with some very rude and offensive emails and a few phone calls from Ms. Wilding herself, claiming we had committed slander, were total idiots, and so on.”
The magic of the internet, eh?

Be Sociable, Share!

37 Responses to “A Filmmaker Responds… Wildly”

  1. EDouglas says:

    Thanks for the crosspost… wonder if we’ll see Ms. Wilding show up here now, too. Hands up who wanted to try to find this movie and see it after reading this review just to see if it’s as bad as they say?

  2. RoyBatty says:

    Okay, that was the funniest thing I’ve read all morning (and reading fan boys flame each other on the IMDB’s X-Men 2 page is pretty entertaining).
    Well, if anything proves that A), every filmmaker needs a publicist, and B), never write anything in a state of rage (or at least, wait awhile before sending it)…
    How hard is it to imagine this woman at her keyboard, eyes manically on the monitor while her fingers stab frantically at the keys. I can’t figure out whole sections of her email for all the typos.
    One thing’s for sure, the reviewer was right that the film must be mostly about her because she sure didn’t learn anything from those monks.

  3. grandcosmo says:

    I loved the fake cease and desist letter written on behalf of the director in the same exact misspelled style with the words transposed the same way.

  4. Jeffrey Boam's Doctor says:

    Oh boy. Anna Wilding. She is close to certifiable. She once said she took ‘preventative chemotherapy’. She spends hours online writing abuse to various parties (will reveal if anyones interested)
    She also gatecrashed Cannes and tried to get New Line to front for damages to supposedly injured/killed horses during the production of LOTR. She is a vindictive nutjub who writes her own website in the 3rd person, she also posts photos of herself (“dammit i’m all legs and boobs” she says in one posting) at cheesy openings in LA. The photos on her site are 9-10yrs old.
    Her face looks like a cheesegrater now and not the photoshopped soft focus ones used on the site. Her site is one giant lie, its pretty entertaining. Her imdb listing proudly announces that she played the first battered wife on a NZ soap. So many Wilding stories so little time.

  5. Wrecktum says:

    Who finances her? Sounds interesting.

  6. Jeffrey Boam's Doctor says:

    We’ve pitched a documentary about her. GRANDEUR OF DELUSIONS

  7. grandcosmo says:

    JBD,
    Is the huge rack at least real?

  8. jeffmcm says:

    Huh, this woman and a huge Brett Ratner movie in the same weekend. They should get together and give birth to the most spoiled awful children ever born (before the inevitable philandering, divorce, and huge settlement).

  9. Jeffrey Boam's Doctor says:

    The rack is real and she will state this ‘fact’ til the cows come home. Unfortunately for Anna, Sir Issac Newton is indeed correct. I’ll try and find some old emails she sent me that really got my back up until I realised that she’s kind of pathetic and not worthy of scorn, no matter how insulting her emails were to someone I knew and who was suffering greatly. She’s from the terrifying new breed of narcissistic self-promoting talentless hacks desperately seeking fame on the internet. She’s the worst I’ve come across. She makes Troy Duffy seem humble.

  10. RoyBatty says:

    I vaguely remember that LA Weekly review and while they seemed to like the film, I think I recall their reviewer too said that the filmmaker inserted herself too much into the doc. Too much about her and not enough about the monks.
    Feel free to add more Wilding stories. Probably speaking for many other would-be directors, writers and actors it’s always reassuring to see the car-wreck of others who have gone over the edge while we still manage to avoid it.

  11. Jeffrey Boam's Doctor says:

    From Anna herself
    “First Impression I Give. Blonde.(unfortunately) Until people get to know me, then they realize I have brains or more to the point I am actually a thinking feeling person and real human being….I forget that even in this day and age- most men still only see the blonde. And breasts why did God or whoever give me breasts.???Totally incongruous to who I am. I spend most of my life hiding them-and all these woman out spending money to get them- I don’t get it. Do they know what its like too wear a bra everytime you go jogging.. I look stupid in a bikini- all long legs and breasts. Went out one night ,in front of the photographer without a bra- just to show that woman with real breasts, even if they are firm, what real breast really look like. I think men have
    forgotten. I am much more comfortable constantly hiding mine.”

  12. jeffmcm says:

    Good selection. You get a sense there of her desperation, her shame in being an exhibitionist but her perverse need to keep doing it all at the same time. Sounds like there’s quite a psychological stew going on there.

  13. RoyBatty says:

    God, I had forgotten about Troy Duffy (perhaps because I like Boondock Saints). I used to go to J Sloans but have no idea if he was ever there.
    Talk about your match made in heaven. Throw in most of those sadly pathetic “journalists” over at the Hollywood Foreign Press and you’d have one helluva of a navel-gazing party. Can you imagine the lot of them showing each other their headshots and pics with the stars?

  14. Cadavra says:

    She and Tony Kaye seem like a match made in…somewhere.

  15. rnic says:

    Buddha Wild Monk in the Hut is a gem. Anna Wilding DID play the battered wife on Shortland St.A NZ TV show. It is on tape. Del Harvey posted Anna’s comments after the fact,after removing misquotes that were in the first review.Would you or your lawyers not be upset if your wrote a book or film and a reviewer misquoted the writing, or words on purpose?
    “Consider the Source” DO NOT believe the lies of the persons stalking her. The “trash” people must be jealous.Anna looks good.Anna did not gate crash an office at Cannes.That is ridiculous. Anna’s representatives,if they could be bothered(and why bother stooping so low as these stalkers), will probaly sue the hackers and stalkers for mass defamation or place charges. You should “consider the source” when reading these things.
    I am sure if Anna has got cross with anyone and sent them an email telling them so it is with just cause. Maybe someone tried to screw her.
    GO and see the film.Anna is hardly in it.And so what if she is! Who cares.Michael Palin ,Woody Allen and many others put themselves in things all the time.Fact is Anna is more than acceptable to watch in it.Fact is “saoneone ” and probably a scorned lover is JEALOUS that Anna is multi talented.Who cares. What is surprising is that “someone” is so blinded by jealous rage that they are in fact the ones who are proving themselves to be very ill indeed. What is more surprising is that anyone would listen to it, how boring!The film is surpisingly good for such a small movie.Get over it!

  16. rnic says:

    HEY dude – yeah there is a typo here and it is not Anna!!!!How about that? Someone else made a typo,a boo boo.Are you going to screw me too!
    Buddha Wild Monk in the Hut is a gem. Anna Wilding DID play the battered wife on Shortland St.A NZ TV show. It is on tape. Del Harvey posted Anna’s comments after the fact,after removing misquotes that were in the first review.Would you or your lawyers not be upset if you wrote a book or film and a reviewer misquoted the writing, or words on purpose?
    “Consider the Source” DO NOT believe the lies of the persons stalking her. The “trash” people must be jealous.Anna looks good.Anna did not gate crash an office at Cannes.That is ridiculous. Anna’s representatives,if they could be bothered(and why bother stooping so low as these stalkers), will probaly sue the hackers and stalkers for mass defamation or place charges. You should “consider the source” when reading these things.
    I am sure if Anna has got cross with anyone and sent them an email telling them so it is with just cause. Maybe someone tried to screw her.
    GO and see the film.Anna is hardly in it.And so what if she is! Who cares.Michael Palin ,Woody Allen and many others put themselves in things all the time.Fact is Anna is more than acceptable to watch in it.Fact is “someone ” and probably a scorned lover is JEALOUS that Anna is multi talented.Who cares. What is surprising is that “someone” is so blinded by jealous rage that they are in fact the ones who are proving themselves to be very ill indeed. What is more surprising is that anyone would listen to it, how boring!The film is surpisingly good for such a small movie.Get over it!

  17. jeffmcm says:

    Is this her?

  18. berightback says:

    Yup the very same “anonymous”. Poke a little and watch her scream.

  19. bogchook says:

    I met Ms Wilding through an association with the temple at which she filmed that home video of hers. I can confirm that she is as nutty as a fruitcake, almost completely unhinged. Somebody should lock her away…

  20. chookychoo says:

    Oh dear boochook,you cant leave her alone can you!You trolls and stalkers.You keep making things up and trying to misinform people! This is also against the law.Let us see,are you the one person who was fired from the film who tried to defraud the production, Or the very stalkers who are bieng “”investigated ” ,who have been “”harrasing for years and sabotaging this film nad this persons life”(also a crime) Regarldess- Yes its a good film,made by a good person,get over it.Its getting good reviews.Even filmmmonthly has taken their site down knowing it to be in error and that there really are stalkers,such as yourself whatever your name really is, that are being investigated. The general public likes the film to date and Temples like the film,it has shown at many Temples and the Temple community in which it was made is all happy and gave it “thumbs up” .An dyes it wa smade a real Temple.So Boo chook ,you little stalker and dismmenator of misnformation and slander..we suggest you stop trolling and go and get on with your life.

  21. jeffmcm says:

    Who does she think she’s fooling?

  22. bogchook says:

    Wow! I didn’t check back here for a while and look what’s been happening! The swivel-eyed looney herself has dropped in under yet another login and left a personal message for me. I feel my life is finally complete. Newsflash! The Wild One was seen at the Avonhead Mall in Christchurch today (26th of October) and sources report that she looked like the proverbial bag lady. It’s rumoured she was scratching through the rubbish bins for half-used tomato sauce sachets, since the movie career hasn’t been providing particularly stellar financial returns and she’s run out of friends to sponge off. You needn’t sink so low Anna – there’s always bed and board at Hillmorton for people like you.

  23. bogchook says:

    Actually JeffMCM, she thinks she’s fooling everybody…

  24. Trollberg says:

    My name is Trollberg.
    I cant help it that I have that name. I wish Anna would stop putting down poor helpless trolls. We cant help who we are.
    Without her negative energy we would have no food and we would not exist. Thanks to her, we can flourish.
    Nonetheless, for those of you who are keeping an eye out on Ana, you should check out her new promotional website.
    http://annaw.fire.prohosting.com/
    Can you imagine corporate people booking her for speaking events?
    I feel sorry for anyone who books her and gets a mouthful of Ana-isms….

  25. jeffmcm says:

    So…you don’t like Anna, but you also don’t like trolls who go after Anna, and you want to publicize her new website?
    What a tangled web we weave…

  26. dm says:

    This is the page of the site that was investigated by the police for four months,as was Film Monthly.This was due to threats Actress,Director and Producer Anna Wilding received from users of this site and Film Monthly,and discreditation attempts.Film Monthly and MCNBlogs,(this site) were sent a formal Cease and Desist Letter citing slander, defamation and threats and and were asked to remove these pertinent pages.Both this site and Film Monthly agreed to to so and did.However this site is still listed on Google and should not be.Consequently Ms Wilding has lost hundreds of thousands dollars of business as a direct result of this slanderous blog page. We ask again that David Poland remove this page from Google and his site, for Wilding’s security ,and protection of her name and likeness.The police found clear malicious intent on this page ,by the users,as they did with Film Monthly,and but one of the words they used was the word “disgusted” at the level of slander and defamation.Here is a Press Release approved by Ms Wildings New York attorneys about this matter.We make note that MS Wilding wa snot searching through rubbish bins,did not crash party at Cannes sand was on Shortland St in 1993 in the role of Gail,a battered wife.She did not send rude emails to any unless deserved by parties who wished her ill and harrassed her. The stalkers are linked to lord of the Rings ,due to ongoing court cases and fears that MS Wilding may be called as witness against them.Many horses died on the film,and as is the case with Michael Vick,it is sometimes not always appropriate.Ms Wilding did the right things at the time.If this page is not removed with full apologies we may be focred to sue David Poland and this industry site.Anyone with any queries or information can email reubensturn@hotmail.com.The Press Release as below
    Anna Wilding Receives Thanks for Humanitarian Efforts on Lord of the Rings from New Line
    by Carly Zander
    NEW YORK, N.Y. – Mar. 9 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — According to Anna Wilding, Mark Ordesky acknowledged and thanked Ms. Wilding for her substantial contribution to the Lord of the Rings movies, in a conversation through New Line’s Legal Affairs to Wilding’s attorneys at the law firm of Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard, in New York. Ms. Wilding has been left grappling with many security concerns since the movies, which has had a significant impact on her career. For the first time Ms. Wilding speaks publicly.
    The films were directed by Peter Jackson and produced by Mark Ordesky and Barry Osbourne. Since the films, Ms. Wilding has been allegedly harassed and defamed by a set of Internet stalkers. It is not known who by, or why, Ms. Wilding is being attacked. Authorities concluded recently that the Internet attacks are coming out of America.
    Ms. Wilding has not been compensated for her work despite the Trilogy grossing over 2 billion and the impact to Ms. Wil ding’s own safety and security. Attorneys for Ms. Wilding sought assistance on a basis of fairness, to help stop the attacks Ms. Wilding has had to endure. No help was forthcoming from New Line.
    Contrary to rumors by fans, there has not ever been any basis for legal proceedings between Ms. Wilding and New Line. Ms. Wilding’s work, that enabled the film to continue, was at the corner stone of a flailing overspilling production beset with difficulties at the time. Anna Wilding worked extensively during the final year of production to bring about a peaceful resolution to ongoing conflicts and concerns on set with regards to the treatment of cast, crew and animals. Mr. Ordesky was often in touch with Ms. Wilding by telephone during both the production and editing stages of the films. to keep abreast of issues.
    Ms. Wilding contacted Mr. Ordesky after she was contacted directly with complaints from crew, and cast members. Ms. Wilding researched, took statements and investigated, and experienced first hand the lack of cooperation, faced by cast and crew as they tried to get matters resolved through the production, safety and occupational groups, animal welfare groups and other agencies and outlets. Ms. Wilding then took the matter to the American Humane Association where for many months she continued to work on resolving matters. Some crew were injured during the making of the films, says Wilding, in which many horses were injured and several horses died.
    All trademarks acknowledged.

  27. dm says:

    This is the page of the site that was investigated by the police for four months,as was Film Monthly.This was due to threats Actress,Director and Producer Anna Wilding received from users of this site and Film Monthly,and discreditation attempts.Film Monthly and MCNBlogs,(this site) were sent a formal Cease and Desist Letter citing slander, defamation and threats and and were asked to remove these pertinent pages.Both this site and Film Monthly agreed to to so and did.However this site is still listed on Google and should not be.Consequently Ms Wilding has lost hundreds of thousands dollars of business as a direct result of this slanderous blog page. We ask again that David Poland remove this page from Google and his site, for Wilding’s security ,and protection of her name and likeness.The police found clear malicious intent on this page ,by the users,as they did with Film Monthly,and but one of the words they used was the word “disgusted” at the level of slander and defamation.Here is a Press Release approved by Ms Wildings New York attorneys about this matter.We make note that MS Wilding wa snot searching through rubbish bins,did not crash party at Cannes sand was on Shortland St in 1993 in the role of Gail,a battered wife.She did not send rude emails to any unless deserved by parties who wished her ill and harrassed her. The stalkers are linked to lord of the Rings ,due to ongoing court cases and fears that MS Wilding may be called as witness against them.Many horses died on the film,and as is the case with Michael Vick,it is sometimes not always appropriate.Ms Wilding did the right things at the time.If this page is not removed with full apologies we may be focred to sue David Poland and this industry site.Anyone with any queries or information can email reubensturn@hotmail.com.The Press Release as below
    Anna Wilding Receives Thanks for Humanitarian Efforts on Lord of the Rings from New Line
    by Carly Zander
    NEW YORK, N.Y. – Mar. 9 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — According to Anna Wilding, Mark Ordesky acknowledged and thanked Ms. Wilding for her substantial contribution to the Lord of the Rings movies, in a conversation through New Line’s Legal Affairs to Wilding’s attorneys at the law firm of Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard, in New York. Ms. Wilding has been left grappling with many security concerns since the movies, which has had a significant impact on her career. For the first time Ms. Wilding speaks publicly.
    The films were directed by Peter Jackson and produced by Mark Ordesky and Barry Osbourne. Since the films, Ms. Wilding has been allegedly harassed and defamed by a set of Internet stalkers. It is not known who by, or why, Ms. Wilding is being attacked. Authorities concluded recently that the Internet attacks are coming out of America.
    Ms. Wilding has not been compensated for her work despite the Trilogy grossing over 2 billion and the impact to Ms. Wil ding’s own safety and security. Attorneys for Ms. Wilding sought assistance on a basis of fairness, to help stop the attacks Ms. Wilding has had to endure. No help was forthcoming from New Line.
    Contrary to rumors by fans, there has not ever been any basis for legal proceedings between Ms. Wilding and New Line. Ms. Wilding’s work, that enabled the film to continue, was at the corner stone of a flailing overspilling production beset with difficulties at the time. Anna Wilding worked extensively during the final year of production to bring about a peaceful resolution to ongoing conflicts and concerns on set with regards to the treatment of cast, crew and animals. Mr. Ordesky was often in touch with Ms. Wilding by telephone during both the production and editing stages of the films. to keep abreast of issues.
    Ms. Wilding contacted Mr. Ordesky after she was contacted directly with complaints from crew, and cast members. Ms. Wilding researched, took statements and investigated, and experienced first hand the lack of cooperation, faced by cast and crew as they tried to get matters resolved through the production, safety and occupational groups, animal welfare groups and other agencies and outlets. Ms. Wilding then took the matter to the American Humane Association where for many months she continued to work on resolving matters. Some crew were injured during the making of the films, says Wilding, in which many horses were injured and several horses died.
    All trademarks acknowledged.

  28. dm says:

    This is the page of the site that was investigated by the police for four months,as was Film Monthly.This was due to threats Actress,Director and Producer Anna Wilding received from users of this site and Film Monthly,and discreditation attempts.Film Monthly and MCNBlogs,(this site) were sent a formal Cease and Desist Letter citing slander, defamation and threats and and were asked to remove these pertinent pages.Both this site and Film Monthly agreed to to so and did.However this site is still listed on Google and should not be.Consequently Ms Wilding has lost hundreds of thousands dollars of business as a direct result of this slanderous blog page. We ask again that David Poland remove this page from Google and his site, for Wilding’s security ,and protection of her name and likeness.The police found clear malicious intent on this page ,by the users,as they did with Film Monthly,and but one of the words they used was the word “disgusted” at the level of slander and defamation.Here is a Press Release approved by Ms Wildings New York attorneys about this matter.We make note that MS Wilding wa snot searching through rubbish bins,did not crash party at Cannes sand was on Shortland St in 1993 in the role of Gail,a battered wife.She did not send rude emails to any unless deserved by parties who wished her ill and harrassed her. The stalkers are linked to lord of the Rings ,due to ongoing court cases and fears that MS Wilding may be called as witness against them.Many horses died on the film,and as is the case with Michael Vick,it is sometimes not always appropriate.Ms Wilding did the right things at the time.If this page is not removed with full apologies we may be focred to sue David Poland and this industry site.Anyone with any queries or information can email reubensturn@hotmail.com.The Press Release as below
    Anna Wilding Receives Thanks for Humanitarian Efforts on Lord of the Rings from New Line
    by Carly Zander
    NEW YORK, N.Y. – Mar. 9 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — According to Anna Wilding, Mark Ordesky acknowledged and thanked Ms. Wilding for her substantial contribution to the Lord of the Rings movies, in a conversation through New Line’s Legal Affairs to Wilding’s attorneys at the law firm of Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard, in New York. Ms. Wilding has been left grappling with many security concerns since the movies, which has had a significant impact on her career. For the first time Ms. Wilding speaks publicly.
    The films were directed by Peter Jackson and produced by Mark Ordesky and Barry Osbourne. Since the films, Ms. Wilding has been allegedly harassed and defamed by a set of Internet stalkers. It is not known who by, or why, Ms. Wilding is being attacked. Authorities concluded recently that the Internet attacks are coming out of America.
    Ms. Wilding has not been compensated for her work despite the Trilogy grossing over 2 billion and the impact to Ms. Wil ding’s own safety and security. Attorneys for Ms. Wilding sought assistance on a basis of fairness, to help stop the attacks Ms. Wilding has had to endure. No help was forthcoming from New Line.
    Contrary to rumors by fans, there has not ever been any basis for legal proceedings between Ms. Wilding and New Line. Ms. Wilding’s work, that enabled the film to continue, was at the corner stone of a flailing overspilling production beset with difficulties at the time. Anna Wilding worked extensively during the final year of production to bring about a peaceful resolution to ongoing conflicts and concerns on set with regards to the treatment of cast, crew and animals. Mr. Ordesky was often in touch with Ms. Wilding by telephone during both the production and editing stages of the films. to keep abreast of issues.
    Ms. Wilding contacted Mr. Ordesky after she was contacted directly with complaints from crew, and cast members. Ms. Wilding researched, took statements and investigated, and experienced first hand the lack of cooperation, faced by cast and crew as they tried to get matters resolved through the production, safety and occupational groups, animal welfare groups and other agencies and outlets. Ms. Wilding then took the matter to the American Humane Association where for many months she continued to work on resolving matters. Some crew were injured during the making of the films, says Wilding, in which many horses were injured and several horses died.
    All trademarks acknowledged.

  29. dm says:

    This is the page of the site that was investigated by the police for four months,as was Film Monthly.This was due to threats Actress,Director and Producer Anna Wilding received from users of this site and Film Monthly,and discreditation attempts.Film Monthly and MCNBlogs,(this site) were sent a formal Cease and Desist Letter citing slander, defamation and threats and and were asked to remove these pertinent pages.Both this site and Film Monthly agreed to to so and did.However this site is still listed on Google and should not be.Consequently Ms Wilding has lost hundreds of thousands dollars of business as a direct result of this slanderous blog page. We ask again that David Poland remove this page from Google and his site, for Wilding’s security ,and protection of her name and likeness.The police found clear malicious intent on this page ,by the users,as they did with Film Monthly,and but one of the words they used was the word “disgusted” at the level of slander and defamation.Here is a Press Release approved by Ms Wildings New York attorneys about this matter.We make note that MS Wilding wa snot searching through rubbish bins,did not crash party at Cannes sand was on Shortland St in 1993 in the role of Gail,a battered wife.She did not send rude emails to any unless deserved by parties who wished her ill and harrassed her. The stalkers are linked to lord of the Rings ,due to ongoing court cases and fears that MS Wilding may be called as witness against them.Many horses died on the film,and as is the case with Michael Vick,it is sometimes not always appropriate.Ms Wilding did the right things at the time.If this page is not removed with full apologies we may be focred to sue David Poland and this industry site.Anyone with any queries or information can email reubensturn@hotmail.com.The Press Release as below
    Anna Wilding Receives Thanks for Humanitarian Efforts on Lord of the Rings from New Line
    by Carly Zander
    NEW YORK, N.Y. – Mar. 9 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — According to Anna Wilding, Mark Ordesky acknowledged and thanked Ms. Wilding for her substantial contribution to the Lord of the Rings movies, in a conversation through New Line’s Legal Affairs to Wilding’s attorneys at the law firm of Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard, in New York. Ms. Wilding has been left grappling with many security concerns since the movies, which has had a significant impact on her career. For the first time Ms. Wilding speaks publicly.
    The films were directed by Peter Jackson and produced by Mark Ordesky and Barry Osbourne. Since the films, Ms. Wilding has been allegedly harassed and defamed by a set of Internet stalkers. It is not known who by, or why, Ms. Wilding is being attacked. Authorities concluded recently that the Internet attacks are coming out of America.
    Ms. Wilding has not been compensated for her work despite the Trilogy grossing over 2 billion and the impact to Ms. Wil ding’s own safety and security. Attorneys for Ms. Wilding sought assistance on a basis of fairness, to help stop the attacks Ms. Wilding has had to endure. No help was forthcoming from New Line.
    Contrary to rumors by fans, there has not ever been any basis for legal proceedings between Ms. Wilding and New Line. Ms. Wilding’s work, that enabled the film to continue, was at the corner stone of a flailing overspilling production beset with difficulties at the time. Anna Wilding worked extensively during the final year of production to bring about a peaceful resolution to ongoing conflicts and concerns on set with regards to the treatment of cast, crew and animals. Mr. Ordesky was often in touch with Ms. Wilding by telephone during both the production and editing stages of the films. to keep abreast of issues.
    Ms. Wilding contacted Mr. Ordesky after she was contacted directly with complaints from crew, and cast members. Ms. Wilding researched, took statements and investigated, and experienced first hand the lack of cooperation, faced by cast and crew as they tried to get matters resolved through the production, safety and occupational groups, animal welfare groups and other agencies and outlets. Ms. Wilding then took the matter to the American Humane Association where for many months she continued to work on resolving matters. Some crew were injured during the making of the films, says Wilding, in which many horses were injured and several horses died.
    All trademarks acknowledged.

  30. dm says:

    2-3 LORD OF THE RINGS FANS INVESTIGATED FOR STALKING and HARRASEMENT
    Not sure if this went through so will repost.
    This is the page of the site that was investigated by the police for four months,as was Film Monthly.This was due to threats Actress,Director and Producer Anna Wilding received from users of this site and Film Monthly,and discreditation attempts.Film Monthly and MCNBlogs,(this site) were sent a formal Cease and Desist Letter citing slander, defamation and threats and and were asked to remove these pertinent pages.Both this site and Film Monthly agreed to to so and did.However this site is still listed on Google and should not be.Consequently Ms Wilding has lost hundreds of thousands dollars of business as a direct result of this slanderous blog page. We ask again that David Poland remove this page from Google and his site, for Wilding’s security ,and protection of her name and likeness.The police found clear malicious intent on this page ,by the users,as they did with Film Monthly,and but one of the words they used was the word “disgusted” at the level of slander and defamation.Here is a Press Release approved by Ms Wildings New York attorneys about this matter.We make note that MS Wilding wa snot searching through rubbish bins,did not crash party at Cannes sand was on Shortland St in 1993 in the role of Gail,a battered wife.She did not send rude emails to any unless deserved by parties who wished her ill and harrassed her. The stalkers are linked to lord of the Rings ,due to ongoing court cases and fears that MS Wilding may be called as witness against them.Many horses died on the film,and as is the case with Michael Vick,it is sometimes not always appropriate.Ms Wilding did the right things at the time.If this page is not removed with full apologies we may be focred to sue David Poland and this industry site.Anyone with any queries or information can email reubensturn@hotmail.com.The Press Release as below
    Anna Wilding Receives Thanks for Humanitarian Efforts on Lord of the Rings from New Line
    by Carly Zander
    NEW YORK, N.Y. – Mar. 9 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — According to Anna Wilding, Mark Ordesky acknowledged and thanked Ms. Wilding for her substantial contribution to the Lord of the Rings movies, in a conversation through New Line’s Legal Affairs to Wilding’s attorneys at the law firm of Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard, in New York. Ms. Wilding has been left grappling with many security concerns since the movies, which has had a significant impact on her career. For the first time Ms. Wilding speaks publicly.
    The films were directed by Peter Jackson and produced by Mark Ordesky and Barry Osbourne. Since the films, Ms. Wilding has been allegedly harassed and defamed by a set of Internet stalkers. It is not known who by, or why, Ms. Wilding is being attacked. Authorities concluded recently that the Internet attacks are coming out of America.
    Ms. Wilding has not been compensated for her work despite the Trilogy grossing over 2 billion and the impact to Ms. Wil ding’s own safety and security. Attorneys for Ms. Wilding sought assistance on a basis of fairness, to help stop the attacks Ms. Wilding has had to endure. No help was forthcoming from New Line.
    Contrary to rumors by fans, there has not ever been any basis for legal proceedings between Ms. Wilding and New Line. Ms. Wilding’s work, that enabled the film to continue, was at the corner stone of a flailing overspilling production beset with difficulties at the time. Anna Wilding worked extensively during the final year of production to bring about a peaceful resolution to ongoing conflicts and concerns on set with regards to the treatment of cast, crew and animals. Mr. Ordesky was often in touch with Ms. Wilding by telephone during both the production and editing stages of the films. to keep abreast of issues.
    Ms. Wilding contacted Mr. Ordesky after she was contacted directly with complaints from crew, and cast members. Ms. Wilding researched, took statements and investigated, and experienced first hand the lack of cooperation, faced by cast and crew as they tried to get matters resolved through the production, safety and occupational groups, animal welfare groups and other agencies and outlets. Ms. Wilding then took the matter to the American Humane Association where for many months she continued to work on resolving matters. Some crew were injured during the making of the films, says Wilding, in which many horses were injured and several horses died.
    All trademarks acknowledged.

  31. hendhogan says:

    wow, talk about beating a dead horse…

  32. L.B. says:

    Any chance that could get posted just one more time?

  33. hendhogan says:

    it’s like the “leave britney alone” video in written form

  34. dm says:

    Ha!Funny harmless quips. True, seems to be exactly what it is saying.
    Finally,a footnote that was meant to be posted yesterday at the time:-
    More investigations,this time in NZ, have found that a “Neil Wells – calling himself from an AWINZ” possibly received a lump sum payment prior to posting a disclaimer on the end of all three Lord of the Rings films. However,notably,AWINZ,the name of the company he issued the disclaimer under , has been proven to NOT be a legally incorporated entity or legal corporation or company at the time. The matter of false disclaimers and Neils Wells actions are currently being investigated and are before NZ parliament.The American Humane Association,that judged all three films “questionable ” made comment on their website that none of the Lord of the Rings disclaimers were sanctioned or issued with the authority by the AHA,the governing bodies for animals in films and television .Anna Wilding, mediated, investigated and raised substantial concerns behind the scenes at the time and as above.This is starting to bring to close a Trilogy that is still subject of several law suits in many areas,namely between cast,crew, and New Line and Peter Jackson.
    Hopefully the prior legal item does not have to be published again.
    http://www.awinz.co.nz/movies1.htm

  35. bogchook says:

    Good lordy lord! It’s fun to check back on an old bookmark every now and then and see what’s been happening. Quite obviously Ms Wilding’s fevered brain hasn’t cooled in the interim, and she remains intent on flogging a dead horse – several of them in fact. The internet provides a forum for all sorts of nutters to vent their spluttering spleens; while I may be one myself, I take comfort from the self-evident fact that Ms WildThing is way, WAY more loopy than me. You go, girl!

  36. AnnaWildingUberMoron says:

    Met her some years ago on a tiny tiny tiny film. One or two vague conversations resulting in brutal verbal assaults via voice mail. Kept one of them for laughs. She is desperate for fame and seems to have lawyers and someone paying for those lawyers ( born with a silver spoon in her mouth one guesses ). Anyway, she is unhinged and in the right situation would be dangerous. Keep the hell away and dont let her anywhere near your project. She is poison.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon