MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

40,000 Comments (Previously, 35,000 Comments)

I noticed that the comments on the blog were approaching 35,000 a couple of weeks ago. Then I noticed that I personally was responsible for over 1000 of those comments.
So I have now waited until there were 35,000 comments aside from my own. And just now, we hit that oddball landmark. (With this entry, we are 87 entries away from 1000… but I think I’ll let my verbosity birthday slip by.)
Just a note to say thanks for participating.
For me, the joy of being on the web has to do with the interaction with the readers. It is all too easy to forget, living in the media bubble, that we are the arbiters only of our own opinions. If we can agree, disagree, and accept that it is all part of a valuable communication, we are all the better for it.
I do regret the one entry in the history of this blog that was erased… on August 19, 2005. A Day That Will Live in Infamy. I should have just left it alone. What’s one dumb spoiler in 35,000 comments?
And so it goes. Play on, players.
12:07p – And of course, an edit already… looking for the first entry, I realized that I completely forgot about the old site of The Hot Blog, which is still there. There were 284 posts there and 5089 comments (excluding mine). That blog started on September 5, 2004 with “Do I Need a Blog?”. So I guess this post should really be called 40,000 comments… and now I feel like I should have waited for 50,000 to mark an anniversary.

Be Sociable, Share!

23 Responses to “40,000 Comments (Previously, 35,000 Comments)”

  1. Tofu says:

    That damned TypePad blog was above this one on Google for months.
    I rarely see writers engage their readers like you do Mr. Poland, and it honestly makes this corner of the web more interesting than quite a few professional movie sites… Combined.

  2. EDouglas says:

    You can tell how many comments people make here? How much do I have to pay you not to share that information with my editor? 🙂

  3. Eric says:

    I’m having a good time looking back at some of the old posts. Shouts to my old school homies.
    By the by, I notice on the old site that it took David four whole days of having a blog before he starting criticizing the New York Times.

  4. David Poland says:

    It’s usually at least that long between really screwed up stories…
    NYT defines the dialogue for a lot of the world. It’s no small responsibility.

  5. palmtree says:

    Who has the most comments?
    My guess would be Jeff.

  6. Spacesheik says:

    It’s a pleasure being here. Keep up the good Poland.
    A lot of astute, acerbic writers here, kudos to you all.
    The highlight for me would be the whole BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, CRASH, MUNICH brouhaha a few months ago. Rarely have I had that much fun on a blog. And most recently Sthe gravy on SUPERMAN IN LOVE.

  7. Eric says:

    Man oh man Sheik. I still have nightmares about the Brokeback talk.
    I’ve been here since the beginning, but I don’t remember the August 19 post that DP mentioned above. Anybody? Was that the “Chester” era?

  8. jeffmcm says:

    I actually suspect that our friend who posted under all the multiple identities (up to 20 at one point) is in fact the most frequent commenteer.

  9. Wrecktum says:

    I’m sure Joe Leydon can fill you in on the “August 19 Incident.”

  10. Aladdin Sane says:

    Wow, I can’t believe it’s almost 2 years shooting the shit.
    I see my old handle on that first post. Goodtimes. Definitely one of the most interesting discussion blogs to visit in my books.

  11. Eric says:

    Hm. Maybe I don’t want to pick on any old scabs.
    Anyways, I’ll share in the sentiment. I read a few message boards, but this is the only one in which I enjoy participating. Many thanks, of course, to David for keeping it running.

  12. Mr. Muckle says:

    Hmmm. . . and which anniversary will this be? I’m guessing — Tinsel!

  13. waterbucket says:

    40,000? Well, 10,000 of those comments are about Brokeback Mountain so you need to thank that film too, you unsexy beast!

  14. palmtree says:

    Half of those are from you, Waterbucket. = )
    I guess he’d also need to thank the troll. Any word on if what Jeff says is true, Mr. Poland?

  15. David Poland says:

    J-Mc is #1 by far, with over 3000 comments.
    As far as I can tell, I’m #2 with less than half than number.

  16. martin says:

    Not exactly on topic, but Poland is getting airplay in the Vice ads. Watch the tv spots on Miamivice.com.

  17. jeffmcm says:

    But like I said, you’d have to compile multiple names, some of which have been lost to the sands of time, for Hicksville.
    Thanks for hosting, DP.

  18. Martin S says:

    Martin – I just noticed the Poland/Vice spot tonight, also. The feature quote in the spot on top of that, to boot.

  19. jeffmcm says:

    Poland Vice – now there’s a movie! Insert submarine and screen door joke here.

  20. Blackcloud says:

    They use his quote on radio, too, but don’t mention his name.

  21. EDouglas says:

    BTW, everyone has seen David’s quote at the beginning of the Miami Vice ads, right?

  22. EDouglas says:

    (I gotta stop skipping around the posts before responding… I missed Martin’s comment bringing up that very subject. I wish we could edit our own comments.)

  23. KamikazeCamelV2.0 says:

    that’s impressive no matter who the person. way to go poland.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon