MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Note…

I just went into comments to check something and saw that there were 47 entries that had been flagged by the system.
I had no idea.
So if you ever post and don’t see it come up, please let me know. There were a few penis enlargement ads in there too, but there werre also a bunch of Jim Emerson One is always welcome and the other not. But I don’t really check very often because it really doesn’t occur to me to do so. So if there is a problem, please shoot me an e-mail.
DP
P.S. Congrats to J-Mc on his record 4000th Hot Blog comment. He must be tired.

Be Sociable, Share!

17 Responses to “Note…”

  1. EDouglas says:

    Congrats to JMc…were any of those 4000 even remotely positive? 🙂

  2. Blackcloud says:

    lol

  3. bipedalist says:

    DP, you get so many comments it would be impossible to get copies of each and every one but unfortunately, that is the only way to stay on top of SPAM so far. They’re getting so good at it. I was stunned to see that there actually is such a thing as 20 inch strap on with a…nevermind.

  4. SpamDooley says:

    But no comments about Spam Dooley, really the only poster here with firsthand knowledge of the business. He comes across as a whiny clod because of his arrogance, but he is smarter than Jeffmcm and the rest of the robots any day of the week.
    I know in secret that you call your commenters the “trained chimps” David but honestly- shouldn’t you thank Spam for forcing your endgame hand regarding that bizarre little masturbatory (one hand at that) exercise called “Lunch with David’? You are never going to replace Ebert- you simply aren’t jouyous enough.
    I am Jeff Well’s Ego.

  5. gturner says:

    I really like the TCIFF pics. A friend of mine was down there for the festival and spent time socializing with Jasmine G. and the Hon. Michael M., etc. If you have more pictures please feel free to send them to me (maybe she’s even in some of them) and I will forward them on to her.

  6. David Poland says:

    You used to be so amusing, Spammy… before you started making lies up about me, assuring me that everything you claim to know is suspect.
    But keep blowing that horn. And can you pass me one of those bananas?

  7. Cadavra says:

    Funny, David, you don’t look jouyous!
    I am Cadavra and I’m here all week!

  8. jeffmcm says:

    David, don’t you wish you had given Spam the shout-out instead of me?

  9. frankbooth says:

    That’s what he does. That’s all he does! You can’t stop him. He can’t be bargained with. He can’t be reasoned with. He doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear.

  10. SpamDooley says:

    lonelydave49
    I know you won’t take the bait, even though as my chimp you asked about bananas. But here we go-
    Name ONE lie that I made up about you.
    Can you?
    I am Spam Dooley and I doubt you.

  11. palmtree says:

    So when he gets to 5000 comments does Jeff get his own MCN column? I’m trying to think of the endgame here!

  12. Jeffrey Boam's Doctor says:

    Spam Murphy. For someone who’s so connected in the industry you sure spend a lot of time trolling and even more time worrying about the fijian wrestler’s career. I come and go from this forum because I have to – I actually produce. From the sounds of it, you’re always lurking close by, seething with envy over Dave’s desire to switch mediums.
    You are Spam Murphy and having met you, I can say you are a doughy mess who should exercise more.

  13. Josh Massey says:

    Let’s see a Top 10 commenter list. How much is J-Mc ahead by?

  14. jeffmcm says:

    I’m willing to bet that, before he was chased away in shame, Hicksville was actually in first place but it didn’t register because he used twenty different names.

  15. SpamDooley says:

    Doctor
    I love the idea of the Fijan wrestler. You haven’t met me because well, I don’t exercise at all and yet am surprisingly fit. And I don’t produce- movies at least. And I am not an Irish B Lister.
    But tell us- WHAT have you produced? I bet it is terrificly stellar.
    I am Spam Dooley and I am not Spock!

  16. jim emerson says:

    Those must’ve been oldies from me. I hope I’m always welcome. If not, I hear this guy Bob has a great deal on Natural Male Enhancement…

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon