MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

Box Office Hell – 11/10


Be Sociable, Share!

5 Responses to “Box Office Hell – 11/10”

  1. jeffmcm says:

    I would love it if Flushed Away would top Santa Clause 3 this weekend.

  2. Wrecktum says:

    Won’t happen.

  3. Lota says:

    one of the Austin Powers’ movies was bigger on the second weekend than the first and I can;t remember if it was 1 or 2. I would love if Borat did a big irreverent explosion and did just as well as the AP movies…and then it would be nice if Flushed away were second.

  4. There was only something like 0.8mil between Santa and Flushed and considering how weak the word-of-mouth appears to be for Santa it seems perfectly plausable for those two to switch this weekend.

  5. EDouglas says:

    I think it’s very likely that Flushed Away will come out on top based on Friday numbers, but I think Santa Clause will move back ahead next weekend.
    BTW, I totally blew my A Good Year prediction but I should be close on Borat, Stranger than Fiction, The Return, Babel and Harsh Times (I said $2-3 million on that)… underestimated both kiddie movies because I didn’t think that school was out for Veterans Day (since the holiday is today) but apparently, it was… those should both end up around $15 million for the weekend, so obviously, BOG took that into account.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon