MCN Columnists
Leonard Klady

By Leonard Klady Klady@moviecitynews.com

Guided Tour …

January 21, 2007
Weekend Estimates
Domestic Market Share

Night at the Museum and Stomp the Yard fought it out for weekend bragging rights with the films finishing the frame with respective estimated grosses of $12.9 million and $12.7 million. In another fiercely competitive frame The Hitcher had a relatively clear field as the sole new national release but wound up a disappointing fourth with $8.2 million. There were also a clutch of pictures that expanded on the heels of the Golden Globes and in advance of Tuesday’s Oscar announcements to fair results but overall business lagged behind 2006 levels.

Night at the Museum continued to be a global threat and on the domestic front saw its cume push past $200 million. Expectations had been high for the film though not quite as lofty as it’s playing. One can hear keyboards across town (and in Sundance) furiously working at concocting the inevitable sequel.

Last weekend’s leader Stomp the Yard was still pumping it out (several sources pegged it slightly ahead of Museum as the frame’s top attraction). The low budget youth oriented pic has emerged as an instant success in what is evolving as a slow starting year.

Considerable energy was put behind the launch of the thriller sequel The Hitcher and many trackers expected it to dominate the session. However, audiences generally opted for less intense fare and the film wound up the weekend with a below average theater average slightly shy of $2,900.

Weekend business kicked off with disappointing Friday results and an unexpected Saturday surge that should translate into revenues approaching $105 million. It represented a 20% dip from the three-day portion of last weekend’s holiday frame and a 15% decline from 2006 when the bow of Underworld: Evolution topped the charts with a $26.9 million gross.

At this juncture last year analysts were pessimistic about how awards would translate into box office for the perceived contenders. Capote was deemed the top beneficiary in a field that had largely spent its energy on the domestic front.

This year’s score card appears more promising though considerably short of a bounty. Saturday’s announcement ofLittle Miss Sunshine as the year’s best by the Producers Guild was a left field surprise and with the film largely finished theatrically everywhere; less than a boon for the industry. Dreamgirls has done a sterling job of presenting itself as the Oscar frontrunner but while business has been consistent one cannot help but wonder why reviews and kudos haven’t translated into a surge. Even more troubling is the decision of a slow roll out that cost it money during the holiday season and has yet to be made up in the march to Academy Awards.

The Queen, Golden Globe winner Babel, The Last King of Scotland and Letter from Iwo Jima were among the weekend expansions timed to Oscar announcements. While one cannot help but embrace surprises, the best picture lineup is apt to be comprised of Sunshine, Dreamgirls, The Queen, Babel and The Departed. In that quintet, only Dreamgirls has yet to step out in the international theatrical arena.

There wasn’t much new activity in the niches though the reissue of the Italian comedy Mafiosa received a warm start with close to a $30,000 gross from two Manhattan screens. Last year’s Russian Oscar submission The Italian was just OK with an opening weekend of $22,800 from four sites.

– Leonard Klady

Weekend Estimates – January 19-21, 2007

Title
Distributor
Gross (average) % change Theaters Cume
Night at the Museum
Fox
12.9 (3,700)
-25%
3483
205.7
Stomp the Yard
Sony
12.7 (6,210)
-42%
2051
41
Dreamgirls
Par
8.3 (3,760)
-1%
2214
77.7
The Hitcher
Focus
8.2 (2,890)
2831
8.2
The Pursuit of Happyness
Sony
6.6 (2,150)
-26%
3066
146.4
Freedom Writers
Par
5.5 (2,390)
-26%
2286
26.8
Pan’s Labyrinth
Picturehouse
4.7 (7,700)
116%
609
10.1
Children of Men
Uni
3.7 (2,430)
-41%
1524
27.5
The Queen
Miramax
3.4 (2,130)
204%
1586
35.5
Arthur and the Invisibles
MGM
3.2 (1,410)
-26%
2248
9.4
Alpha Dog
Uni
3.0 (2,290)
-54%
1292
11.8
Charlotte’s Web
Par
2.3 (1,200)
-40%
1915
76.7
Babel
Par Vantage
2.2 (2,500)
483%
889
23.8
The Good Shepherd
Uni
2.2 (1,380)
-42%
1571
57.7
Blood Diamond
WB
1.8 (1,930)
-25%
955
50.7
Primeval
BV
1.8 (730)
-71%
2444
9.5
The Last King of Scotland
Fox Searchlight
1.7 (3,470)
495
5.4
We Are Marshall
WB
1.7 (1,160)
-30%
1440
41.3
Rocky Balboa
MGM
1.5 (1,020)
-47%
1450
67.6
Letter from Iwo Jima
WB
1.5 (4,080)
302%
360
2.6
Happily Never After
Lions Gate
1.4 (810)
-54%
1758
13.8
Happy Feet
WB
1.3 (1,280)
-36%
1004
190.7
Casino Royale
Sony
1.3 (1,920)
-27%
661
164.4
Notes on a Scandal
Fox Searchlight
1.2 (6,100)
-25%
200
6.1
Eragon
Fox
1.2 (1,080)
-44%
1075
72.3
The Painted Veil
WIP
1.0 (2,810)
-1%
352
3.9
Curse of the Golden Flower
Sony Classics
.82 (710)
-56%
1149
5.8
The Holiday
Sony
.72 (1,000)
-52%
719
62.9
Code Name: The Cleaner
New Line
.55 (810)
-67%
675
7.8
Apocalypto
BV
.51 (1,460)
-40%
349
49.8
Weekend Total ($500,000+ Films)
$98.90
% Change (Last Year)
-15%
% Change (Last Week)
-20%
Also debuting/expanding
Miss Potter
MGM
.16 (4,240)
1%
29
0.58
Venus
Miramax
.10 (8,250)
231%
12
0.32
Mafiosa (reissue)
Rialto
29,200 (14,600)
2
0.03
The Italian
Sony Classics
22,800 (5,700)
4
0.02
Alone With Her
IFC
5,500 (5,500)
1
0.01

Domestic Market Share: Jan 1-18, 2006

Distributor (releases)
Gross
Percentage
Fox (7)
93.8
20.40%
Sony (7)
92.6
20.20%
Paramount (5)
77.7
16.90%
Universal (3)
51.9
11.30%
Warner Bros. (10)
44.9
9.80%
MGM (5)
30.1
6.60%
Buena Vista (7)
17.5
3.80%
Lions Gate (3)
12.9
2.80%
New Line (3)
9.7
2.10%
Sony Classics (2)
5.7
1.20%
Fox Searchlight (4)
5.1
1.10%
Picturehouse (1)
4.9
1.10%
Miramax (2)
4.1
0.90%
Other * (15)
8.1
1.80%
* none greater than 0.5%
459
100.00%

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Klady

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon