MCN Columnists
Leonard Klady

By Leonard Klady Klady@moviecitynews.com

Be Disturbed .. Be Very, Very Disturbed!

April 15, 2007
Weekend Finals
Domestic Market Share

The offbeat teen thriller Disturbia took top honors in weekend movie going with an estimated $22.8 gross. Five other films bowed nationally to generally disappointing results as the industry appeared to be emulating the August tradition of dumping product. However, in this instance new entries were anticipating quick turnarounds as the May onslaught of tentpole titles will sweep them from the screen.

Though some pundits were predicting that the Bruce Willis-Halle Berry thriller Perfect Strangerwould be competitive with Disturbia it finished below expectations and ranked fourth with $11.4 million. The rest of the newbies turned in bland returns. Vikings were less than Greek inPathfinder‘s $4.7 million box office; Redline circled the track with $3.9 million; the Aqua Teen Hunger Team (ATHT) grossed $2.9 million; and there was a very Slow Burn of the appropriately titled film of $740,000.

New entries in niche and specialized arenas were equally vigorous with the best initial response going to Mike White‘s droll comic Year of the Dog with a screen average of $14,800 from seven venues.

Volume once again trumped strength with frame ticket sales topping roughly $115 million for a 6% downturn from the prior weekend. Business was down by 2% from 2006 when it corresponded with Easter and top honors went to the $40.2 million bow of Scary Movie 4.

The presumed dust up between Disturbia and Perfect Stranger turned out to be no contest. Though the former received unexpectedly good reviews and the latter was largely dismissed with derision, demographics told the tale. Disturbia‘s core male under 25 crowds proved considerably more rabid than the other film’s appeal to 25 plus females and that produced a stark contrast when pitted head to head.

The frame’s other distinctive twist was the appearance of a pair of launches by a new company and one that rarely steps out with a national release. The auto speed yarn Redline was hardly the marketplace pace car and though its producer Chicago Pictures has at least one other film in the pipeline its initial experience may steer it away from future theatrical ventures.

First Look’s new management has announced a move away from specialized fare and into the mainstream but its first foray with the animated TV series Aqua Teen Hunger Team was an inauspicious start for the policy. It simply couldn’t hold its own against Meet the Robinsons, Firehouse Dog and the lingering TMNT.

Some long running titles continued to be commercially potent including 300 that saw its domestic cume surpass $200 million. Among last weekend’s freshmen Are We Done Yet? appears to have found its niche while the graphic genre entries The Reaping and Grindhouse both took hard hits.

While hipper and younger, Mike White could well follow in the footsteps of Albert Brooks andChristopher Guest as an alternative comic voice. Initial response to his Year of the Dog was excellent though he’s not quite crossed over to the box office response for Best in Show.

The other limited bows ranged from disappointing to passable including the Dahliaesque Lonely Hearts that eked out roughly $73,000 from 23 investigations and the French import Moliere with $78,000 in 28 Quebec locations. Exclusive runs from Brit fest fave Red Road, the doc Dreaming Lhasa and Alain Resnais’ Private Fears in Public Places (aka Couers) all had good engagements in one to three situations with averages in the $6,000 to $8,000 range.

– Leonard Klady

Weekend Estimates – April 13-15, 2007

Title
Distributor
Gross (averag
% change
Theaters
Cume
Disturbia
Par
22.8 (7,800)
2925
22.8
Blades of Glory
Par
14.2 (4,090)
-37%
3467
90.3
Meet the Robinsons
BV
12.0 (3,700)
-28%
3238
71.9
Perfect Stranger
Sony
11.4 (4,300)
2661
11.4
Are We Done Yet?
Sony
9.0 (3,780)
-37%
2877
32.8
Pathfinder
Fox
4.7 (2,720)
1720
4.7
Wild Hogs
BV
4.6 (1,630)
-31%
2825
152.2
The Reaping
WB
4.5 (1,740)
-55%
2603
19.7
300
WB
4.4 (1,640)
-48%
2674
200.9
Grindhouse
Weinstein Co.
4.1 (1,570)
-64%
2629
19.6
Redline
Chicago Pics
3.9 (2,440)
1607
3.9
Shooter
Par
3.1 (1,630)
-47%
1907
42.1
Aqua Teen Hunger Team
First Look
2.9 (3,330)
877
2.9
Firehouse Dog
Fox
2.8 (960)
-28%
2881
9.9
TMNT
WB
2.1 (1,140)
-56%
1855
50.7
The Hoax
Miramax
1.5 (3,560)
1%
413
3.4
The Namesake
Fox Searchlight
1.3 (3,840)
-26%
331
8.7
Premonition
Sony
1.2 (1,180)
-62%
992
46.9
Reign Over Me
Sony
.86 (870)
-65%
990
19.1
Slow Burn
Lions Gate
.74 (640)
1163
0.74
Weekend Total ($500,000+ Films)
$112.10
% Change (Last Year)
-2%
% Change (Last Week)
-6%
Also debuting/expanding
Black Book
Sony Classics
.22 (7,960)
97%
28
0.4
Year of the Dog
Par Vantage
.10 (14,770)
7
0.1
Moliere
Christal
78,500 (2,800)
28
0.08
Lonely Hearts
IDP
73,400 (3,190)
23
0.07
Red Road
Tartan
17,700 (5,900)
3
0.02
Private Fears in Public Places
IFC
14,600 (7,300)
2
0.01
Dreaming Lhasa
First Run
7,820 (7,820)
1
0.01
Everything’s Gone Green
First Independe
4,100 (4,100)
1
0.01

Domestc Grosses – Jan 1 – April 12, 2007

300
WB
196,510,780
Wild Hogs
BV
147,604,087
Night at the Museum *
Fox
132,981,429
Ghost Rider
Sony
114,997,558
Norbit
Par
94,815,036
Bridge to Terabithia
BV
80,838,355
Blades of Glory
Par
76,130,018
Dreamgirls *
Par
66,191,223
The Pursuit of Happyness *
Sony
65,741,400
Stomp the Yard
Sony
61,574,317
Meet the Robinsons
BV
59,900,752
Music and Lyrics
WB
49,980,441
TMNT
WB
48,559,763
Premonition
Sony
45,717,189
Because I Said So
Uni/Seville
42,727,767
Epic Movie
Fox
39,706,932
Shooter
Par
38,996,701
Pan’s Labyrinth *
Picturehouse
36,645,970
Freedom Writers
Par
36,643,426
The Messengers
Sony
35,815,687
* does not include 2006 box office

Domestic Market Share: Jan 1 – April 12, 2007

Distributor (releases)
Gross
Mrkt Share
Warner Bros. (15)
415.5
17.10%
Sony (12)
411.4
16.90%
Paramount (10)
381.3
15.70%
Buena Vista (11)
312.6
12.80%
Fox (11)
242
9.90%
Universal (8)
201.8
8.30%
MGM (9)
77.8
3.20%
New Line (5)
67.8
2.80%
Lions Gate (5)
55.1
2.30%
Fox Searchlight (6)
51.7
2.10%
Miramax (4)
37.5
1.50%
Picturehouse (2)
36.9
1.50%
Par Vantage (2)
23.8
1.00%
Sony Classics (6)
21.4
0.90%
IDP (3)
20.1
0.80%
Weinstein Co. (5)
16.8
0.70%
Focus (1)
16.5
0.70%
Other * (77)
45
1.80%
* none greater than .045%
2435
100.00%
Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Klady

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon