MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Just A Pleasure…

Every now and again, I am reminded why my work brings me so much pleasure.
This afternoon, I had the opportunity to sit down with Frank Langella, whose powerfully quiet turn in Starting Out In The Evening is garnering awards buzz and who just wrapped up roughly 18 months in Richard Nixon’s skin, from the first call to come to London to do Frost/Nixon, though a Broadway run, and wrapping his work on Ron Howard’s adaptation of the show just a couple of days ago.
Besides being a gentleman and a remarkably accomplished actor, something about chatting with a veteran who knows what his boundaries are, is firm about them, but is ultimately generous seems to have the calming effect in me every time. The perspective of maturity in success reminds me that it is possible, as there are so many examples of the alternative in our little Hollywood universe.
And it’s not just Mr Langella. It’s a lot of the people I get to talk to for extended periods lately. These chats are a part of what I have done this time of the season for years now, but not previously on camera. Shooting these conversations frees me from having to structure and bring writerly skills to interpreting their personalities and voices. You can see them for yourselves… no interpretation neccessary. For me, that is a great pleasure. My work is now in gently guiding the discussion in a way that brings out the subject. I am endlessly surprised at how generous people are with themselves once they are comfortable that we are really listening. Very exciting for me… and hopefully the viewer.
Anyway… the interview should be online in the next couple of weeks. Forgive my overshare, but sometimes I just feel like offering up some of the experience of being on this side of the table.

Be Sociable, Share!

6 Responses to “Just A Pleasure…”

  1. anghus says:

    can’t wait to see Frost/Nixon.

  2. Noah says:

    Langella freaked me out as Quilty in the remake of Lolita. But I’ll always think of him as the villain from Dave. He always reminded me of Christopher Lee and I hope Langella sticks around for another twenty to thirty years because he seems to get better with age. And I’m excited to see him in something in which he isn’t just an evil villain (the dude has played Dracula, John Wilkes Booth, Skeletor in Masters of the Universe, if he just played Hitler and Stalin I think he’d cover everyone). He also did great work on HBO’s short-lived Unscripted.

  3. Cadavra says:

    And he’s also sensational on Broadway, not only in FROST/NIXON, but also in MATCH (as a flamboyant gay) and FORTUNE’S FOOL (as a wise-cracking Russian ex-nobleman). The man can do practically anything.

  4. Joe Leydon says:

    OK, I have to ask: David, as a musical-comedy aficionado, you did ask him about Those Lips, Those Eyes, right? (He was also a pretty damn good Henry Higgins for the Houston Grand Opera several years ago.)

  5. Reid Rosefelt says:

    Funny you should mention that, Joe. Langella has recently mentioned in interviews how much he’d like to do another musical.
    Langella has a career-long reputation for not doing interviews. The fact that he’s opened up for FROST/NIXON and STARTING OUT IN THE EVENING might be a sign of his mellowing, but certainly speaks to his love of those two projects.
    I’ve been a fan since DIARY OF A MAD HOUSEWIFE and THE 12 CHAIRS, and it’s been a thrill to see him move from all the larger-than-life roles he’s known for to these two quieter ones.
    (I also had the pleasure of interviewing him when I wrote the press notes for STARTING, and I agree with everything Dave said.)

  6. Joe Leydon says:

    I’ve been a fan since I saw him in Edward Albee’s Seascape. And I thought he was great in the Broadway revival of Dracula. I’ve never understood why he didn’t become a movie star yaers ago. Well, OK, he did do Sphinx, but still… He was a nifty Zorro, and a fine Sherlock Holmes. Hell, he was a terrific villain in Wrath of God opposite Robert Mitchum.
    And you’re both right: He is a very gracious interview.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon