MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

The Media Foists Its Own View Of Middle America On Disney

I find it fascinating that the media is now having a field day – four links on the cover of MCN and more to come, I’m sure – taking the position that Wall-E’s portrayal of a future…
… in which earth has been decimated, the survivors live on corporately-controlled ships in which they are kept satisfied and simple-minded so there are no rebellious thoughts – not unlike The Matrix.… duh! –
….is all about the people being… OMFG! – FAT!!!!!
To me, the whole attitude combines two of the media’s worst traits… first, gross oversimplification… second, the tendency to look at groups in which they are not – or have been not since they dragged themselves into the media universe – reflected.
Is there anyone whose parents didn’t tell them that too much TV and junk food and laziness would make them into a miserable, brain damaged blob? I mean, really, is this idea so simple and obvious that “critics” look right past it and feel compelled to make it all about our obsession with weight?
There is a real hatred in the media, both left and right (coasts and ideologies), of the “soft” middle of America. Fox News pretends not to have this so it can bow to the right wing, which is allegedly favored by the heartland… but look at its parade of blonde, tartified women anchors and, often, “experts.” They are as image conscious as Maureen Dowd as Jessica Rabbit on her book cover.
By making this into an issue, all “we” are doing is pointing at the fat people and saying, “Why doesn’t Disney feel sorry for them? They are fat! We know… we’ve seen them in tank tops at Disneyland (while we cut in front of them with special passes that we had our producers and editors get for us from our media friends and partners at Disney)!”
Deep dark truthful mirror time, kids.
Obviously, there is a satirical thread in this film that has a Wal-Mart like corporation taking over the entire planet. There is no government… only the corporation. You know, like every smart person with an eye on a world that is becoming dominated by commerce over ideology has recognized for more than a decade.
Obviously, Wall-E is a cartoon… and bodies in jellied pods have been done before. So has a world in which young people are tricked into thinking that all is well and as soon as they hit 30, they are killed and thrown off the ship. So here we are in a generation that shops in big box stores in bulk, in a nation where obesity is epidemic not because we are an inherently lazy people but because portion control and self-control is out of control, where we spend more and more time attached to machines and not enjoying the simple activities of life, like playing in the yard, the way we once did… it all makes sense.
And might I point our, Wall-E sounds a hopeful note, that all we have to do to change is to choose to change our outlook and to make a real effort.
And while all this mewing about Wall-E is going on, media seems to endlessly look away as we and our children are endlessly told that Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt and the MTV Idiot Squad are what we all must look like if we are to be worthy in this world… without the slightest f-ing sense of irony or rage. You think Wall-E is insulting its audience? Compared to the cover of People or Us or any of those crap rags, it is LOVING its audience. And you can be sure that its audience will love it back.
It is stunning how stupid we are all willing to allow ourselves to be in order to make a civil discussion into A STORY.
Boo on us.

Be Sociable, Share!

49 Responses to “The Media Foists Its Own View Of Middle America On Disney”

  1. mutinyco says:

    Can you say… “meta”…
    Complaining about corporations complaining about a movie that says people are dumb and lazy because of corporations that are making them dumb and lazy.

  2. doug r says:

    Somewhat related….my large wife and myself enjoyed the dancing sequence in Get Smart. Nice balance between making fun of and competence, like the rest of the movie.

  3. Triflic says:

    Sounds a lot like Mike Judge’s Idiocracy.

  4. swordandpen says:

    It’s once again the media’s attempt to turn a movie or a t.v. show or music into a cause for phony umbrage, in which they inform a certain group of people (in this case, overweight people) that they must be offended by a work of art and entertainment, as opposed to being offended by ugly events in real life, which the media refuses to acknowledge.
    That Wall-E has the ambition to say something, as well as entertain, makes me more excited to see it.
    When I heard about this, I thought not only of “Idiocracy” but the way Americans were portrayed in “The Triplets of Belleville”.

  5. hcat says:

    This is just like when that liberal pinko Chuck Heston advocated the use of birth control by starring in Soylent Green.

  6. jeffmcm says:

    I think that was more about ‘cannibalism bad’. Which is, agreed, a liberal position.

  7. hcat says:

    Its been years since I saw it, but I thought the end of the world scenario in Soylent Green was brought on by overpopulation.

  8. jeffmcm says:

    Yeah it is, but it doesn’t get into the whys and wherefores.

  9. Wrecktum says:

    “That Wall-E has the ambition to say something, as well as entertain, makes me more excited to see it.”
    Except for the “entertain” part, you nailed it.

  10. jeffmcm says:

    98% positive on Rottentomatoes.
    I guess Wrecktum’s a 2%er.

  11. Wrecktum says:

    There’s always one 2 percenter, isn’t there?
    This movie will not be universally beloved, by the way. The dissenters won’t be the press (who love things that are different and unique) but rather the public, especially the parents whose small children will fidget the whole film.
    This is the only Pixar movie that I’ve ever heard anyone say they “hated” it.

  12. jeffmcm says:

    Yeah, but _no_ movie is universally beloved.

  13. Wrecktum says:

    The Wizard of Oz is universally beloved. So is Saw 3.

  14. jeffmcm says:


  15. messiahcomplexio says:

    If Wells wrote this article, it would probably be titled
    “judging the jabba’s”.

  16. Rothchild says:

    No movie is universally beloved? You show me someone that doesn’t love Groundhog Day and I’ll show you a fucking son of a bitch.

  17. Wrecktum says:

    I hate Andy MacDowell in Groundhog Day. Does that count?

  18. Rothchild says:

    And you hate Wall-E? Good luck with that.

  19. Wrecktum says:

    I don’t remember saying I hated it. Did I?

  20. blkbandit says:

    its funny how people focus on the fat aspect of wall-e but completely ignores the racist and elitist aspect of it. a brown, obviously lower class, robot obsesses and pursues a white blue-eyed one. people tend to give pixar a pass to many times on issues like these.

  21. Wrecktum says:

    That’s a joke, right?

  22. jeffmcm says:

    It does remind me of the Star Wars rant in Chasing Amy.

  23. leahnz says:

    wall-e doesn’t open here until SEPTEMBER for some bizarro reason only the witches around the international distribution cauldron will ever know, bums me out

  24. Ugh, September for us too. I imagine it’s to do with school holidays and the desire to get it away from Kung Fu Panda. School holidays are a bitch when, ya know, you’re no longer in school. They did this last year with Ratatouille as well. Peeves me off like almost nothing else. I can turn into the hulk when talking about distribution. Perfectly nice and stable one minute, but mention having to wait three months for Wall-E (or a year and a half for The Painted Vel perhaps) and I turn into a crazy deranged psychopath with amazing leg muscles.
    I just thought I’d throw that last bit in there.

  25. IOIOIOI says:

    What are the holidays for exactly?

  26. …school holidays for when students don’t have to go to school for two weeks between terms (there are four terms each schooling year).
    Doesn’t America have that?

  27. hcat says:

    American kids have around two months off during the summer, then go non-stop with the occasional day off and around a week around Christmas and a week of Spring Break. That is when they can get their tubby butts to class under their own power.

  28. doug r says:

    Around here, most elementary and high schools get out in late June and come back for the next grade in September. Some places earlier in June-late August.

  29. Oh. Okay. Over here the school year starts usually in Feb and goes through to December, but the year it split into four terms. In between each term of about 8 weeks they get – usually – two weeks holidays. But, over Summer (christmas time) it’s about a month or two off. So the year is sort of split into four quarters.
    Which is why kids movies are held back a lot until school holidays, at which time we get a glut of them and some inevitably fail. School holidays are starting now in various states, which is why Kung-Fu Panda is out and Wall-E is waiting for September holidays.

  30. Rothchild says:

    Holy crap. It’s a masterpiece. The montage of Wall-E taking care of Eve in the first act is the most beautiful thing I’ve seen in theaters in years.

  31. Wrecktum says:

    Different strokes and all that.

  32. sharonfranz says:

    Is it really a hatred? Or just pointing things out. When I went to Europe, I noticed that people there are, in general, thinner. It’s strange how even though the media promotes thinness, we, in general, are heading towards the other direction.
    In China, they promote roundness, but most are super thin. There, if you have a belly, you’re considered lucky and prosperous. But everyone is thin there.
    Strange that in these two countries, we become the opposite of what is promoted in the media.

  33. leahnz says:

    kam (lol the amazing leg muscles), ‘the painted veil’ just opened here a couple weeks ago. i went to see it with a girlfriend and it was sold out! hmmf. went to ‘brick lane’ instead, which was beautifully filmed, slow but lovely.
    i hate how they hoard the ‘family’ movies for the school holidays, those sadists.

  34. Cadavra says:

    “No movie is universally beloved? You show me someone that doesn’t love Groundhog Day and I’ll show you a fucking son of a bitch.”
    Hi, Rothchild, fucking son of a bitch here. Though I did very much like 12:01 P.M., the (very serious) short subject that GHD ripped off.

  35. jeffmcm says:

    I knew there had to be one, somewhere. So who’s the weirdo who doesn’t like Wizard of Oz?

  36. Tofu says:

    Lucifer doesn’t post here.

  37. Blackcloud says:

    Having seen it yesterday, I would say that aesthetically “Wall*E” is an absolute triumph, but narratively is underdeveloped.

  38. Triple Option says:

    Many of the negative comments I’ve been reading about the movie’s message have come against it supposedly advancing a liberal-biased, environmentalist campaign. Maybe an existing one world order being a corporation has a stronger cautionary element on the left but what I didn’t so much see was moralizing about waste or pollution, so much as the film seeming to point to society’s inability to get off its collective ass. Virtual games, buying in bulk, and if you look a little harder, self gratification, e.g. retail therapy, as a means to fulfillment that ultimately leaves one empty.
    Plenty of sci fi flix portray a post apocalyptic world. Most use nuclear annihilation, I thought it was cool they’d used over consumption. My problem was I just wasn’t totally engaged. I really wanted to get on board with Wall-e, but truth is I wasn’t attached. I liked all the elements, a life of Sisyphus existence, romantic desires to sing and dance with someone special, and yearning for someone you’re willing to open up to in hopes of that being being able understand you. I just wasn’t too connected. And that made the movie a disappointment to me.
    Maybe because it didn’t take me anywhere I didn’t expect it to go. Maybe I needed a greater sense of sacrifice. I also thought that it may’ve been missing a sense of awe and wonderment that happens in other sci fi and even Pixar films, like asking the question of what does that once special toy feel after its owner has outgrown her.
    I needed to feel Wall-e’s pain and joy but somehow I was left as neutral as the robots that served them.

  39. IOIOIOI says:

    Wall-E gave everything for love and humanity. Everything. What brought him back? Love.
    If this does not connect with you. What exactly does connect with you? Is a kiss not good enough for you? Holding hands?
    The love this movie has for humanity is off the charts. The movie loves humanity even if we sit in chairs, forget how to walk, and stay like babies all of our lives. This story never ever forgets that humans can overcome no matter what stands in our way. It believes in people and machines.
    Again… how does that not work for you? Your response makes absolutely no sense to me. It’s just mind-boggling, stupifying, and comes across as being soulless.

  40. Wrecktum says:

    Don’t be an asshole, IO. Soulless my ass. Some people (me, for example) didn’t connect with the character and, consequently, couldn’t give a rat’s ass about any of the sacrifice at the end.
    Too me the whole character felt contrived and manipulative. I could feel the filmmakers’ heavy hand on every movement and chirp. Just because you were moved doesn’t mean everyone else has to be. Why is always my-way-or-the-highway with all of the arrogant numbnuts on this board?

  41. IOIOIOI says:

    Wrecktum: you are the one who hates humanity. If you actually liked people. You might have connected with a tiny robot who found an appreciation for this world thanks to everything humanity left behind.
    It has nothing to do with being an asshole. It has to do with you. If you do not connect with this beautiful movie that loves robot and humanity alike. Well… really… what good are you?

  42. Wrecktum says:

    You’re obviously troubled. Reconsider your life, I beg you.

  43. IOIOIOI says:

    No, I think you are the one who is troubled and has a detachment from people. Seriously, your Tim Russert responses demonstrated how whacked out of your goard that you are, and this only adds to your cake of SPECIAL. So go get the proper help, and try to get in contact with a person in real-life. You sorry fucking sod.

  44. Wrecktum says:

    Notice you’re the only one lashing out here. If you read my analytical discussion of Russert in total, you’d obviously not be so irrational. The point is: your opinion of WALL-E means as much as anyone else’s. I’d be happy to discuss the film in a sensible manner, but if you’re just going to insult and ridicule, then I’m out.

  45. Lota says:

    Goodness me. This thread has become “Jarndyce vs. Jarndyce”
    Maybe I better not say my thoughts on Wall-e.

  46. IOIOIOI says:

    Wrec: a sensible matter? There’s nothing to discuss with you. The little robot with a heart of gold did not connect with you. So really, there’s not thing do here, but state the obvious between you and I. These things matter. It’s tacky, but they do. If you are not down, then you are not down, and there’s nothing left to post.

  47. jeffmcm says:

    Okay, now that I’ve seen it, I can say that I liked it, but I’m going to predict a US gross in the range of $250-275, aka the same territory as Monsters/Incredibles. It didn’t feel like it had the same things going for it that Finding Nemo did to push it well over $300m.

  48. THX5334 says:

    I saw it today at AMC century city here in LA.
    Quick aside, I asked how Hancock was selling, the ticket guy said not as well as he expected..
    Anyways, my girl and I am just disgusted and done with the adult audience’s manners in what is supposed to be the worlds “film “capital. Constant texting and smartphone bullshit out of every corner of my eye throughout the whole movie. The theatre was crowded and hot with no AC for the whole movie.
    I really dont mind if kids are loud and talk at the screen at a film like this; in fact I kinda like it, but I cant deal with their parents not even attempting to try to quiet them, and teaching them manners or to be considerate of others around them. If the kid is just too into the movie and cant stop asking questions about the story, Im down with that. but if they’re uncomfortable or upset, handle your shit and get them the fuck out of the theatre.
    The whole experience made me and the girl decide we’re going to pull the trigger on a 1080p Projector and 100” screen for the apartment, even though money is tight. We’re going to opt for waiting on that oh so shortening home video release window and have a “theatre” experience under our own conditions. We’ll hit the real theatre for big event movies like Dark Knight when we can select our seats and find a show where the audience isn’t lame.
    But Wall-E wasn’t playing anywhere with that option.
    However, until then; it’s going to be home theatre for most of the time from now on.
    As for Wall-E; it was awesome, but I still feel The Incredibles deserves the title of Masterpiece, more so than this. Though I was very impressed and think it’s probably my second favorite Pixar flick.

  49. jeffmcm says:

    Your first mistake was going to Century City.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon