MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

ComicCon To Go

As they did last year, Paramount sent their ComicCon package out to journalists around the country this morning… I ran into it as I opened the door shortly after writing the last entry. It’s just like being there… except without thousands of screaming, cranky people in Hall H waiting hours for 2 minutes of footage for Mega Movie X, Y or Z, $5 sodas you have to wait on line for, fighting one’s way through the convention floor, and trying to find another way of explaining why the most entertaining moments at the event are not the scripted dog & ponies, but the crazy questions that some Con-ers ask… a practice which The ‘Con has been cutting back on harshly in the last two years as personal publicists whined…
ccontform2.jpg
Brilliant. Let’s throw credit to Mike Vollman, who is on his way out to UA/MGM, where the “Tom Cruise Is A F**king Nazi!” T-shirts can’t be far behind. (It’s actually a good idea… lower the flame on that pot.)
cconairbend.jpg
And they finally decided it was time for one last Air Bud movie. Cool T. The guys from Pineapple Express would dig it.

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Responses to “ComicCon To Go”

  1. a1amoeba says:

    Living here in San Diego, Comic Con is the only time of year that I go out of my way to avoid the downtown. The mass of geekdom is too overwhelming.
    Why anybody would pay top dollar to be crammed into top capacity crowds in a too-small venue (and it’s a large venue) to paw over tacky merchandise and see clips that will inevitably be on the internet in a week is beyond me.
    Oh wait, they don’t have girlfriends…

  2. Tofu says:

    Air Bud
    Hey, this joke wasn’t funny the first time! ;D
    /big fan, the series finale rocked

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon