MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

The Scariest Non-Answer Yet?

Seriously… really… can anyone decipher this?
Does the odd non-answer, one step above “I can see Russia from my porch,” but is there any real answer in here?

The transcript after the jump…


COURIC: You’ve cited Alaska’s proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?
PALIN: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and on our other side, the land– boundary that we have with– Canada. It– it’s funny that a comment like that was– kind of made to– cari– I don’t know, you know? Reporters–
COURIC: Mock?
PALIN: Yeah, mocked, I guess that’s the word, yeah.
COURIC: Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.
PALIN: Well, it certainly does because our– our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They’re in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia–
COURIC: Have you ever been involved with any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?
PALIN: We have trade missions back and forth. We– we do– it’s very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where– where do they go? It’s Alaska. It’s just right over the border. It is– from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to– to our state.

Be Sociable, Share!

17 Responses to “The Scariest Non-Answer Yet?”

  1. mysteryperfecta says:

    Why don’t you just follow Palin around with your iPhone and give us minute-to-minute updates?

  2. IOIOIOI says:

    Why don’t you realize that you are a stupid motherfucker supporting the bankruptcy of this country. Stupid ass. Sort of like the VP candidate you will be voting for ditzy.

  3. scarper86 says:

    My dad is a pretty conservative guy, but even he has been drawing the line on Republicans lately because he said he “just can’t abide stupid” in addition to the fact that most recent Republicans aren’t true conservatives anyway.
    My dad is an educated, successful guy and it kills him that erudition is now a Republican taboo and ignorance is a heartland value that trumps all right-wing virtues.
    Regardless of ideology, to support Palin is to support dumb. Why do you hate America so?

  4. Krazy Eyes says:

    Mystery . . . instead of your usual sarcastic response, why don’t you explain to us what you find encouraging by this interview with Palin. What aspect to her answers do you think makes her a great VP choice?

  5. David Poland says:

    Mystery… following Palin around all day would lead to exactly as much as I have posted… 6 questions answered in one month and babbling talking points with Katie “The Killer Interviewer” Couric. That’s all there has been, unless you want me to cover Bill Clinton trying to figure out whether he can get into her hockey pants without getting caught.

  6. Josh Massey says:

    “I can see Russia from my porch…”
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but did Palin ever say this? It was Cindy McCain, somebody who – last time I checked – wasn’t running for anything.

  7. Cadavra says:

    I can see Warner Bros. from my house, but that doesn’t make me Clint Eastwood.

  8. frankbooth says:

    “… following Palin around all day would lead to exactly as much as I have posted… 6 questions answered in one month and babbling talking points with Katie “The Killer Interviewer” Couric.”
    Slap! One for DP.
    You’re fucking bore, mystery. At least be funny, or something. Maybe you guys should just appoint Mgmax your official spokesperson.
    Massey —
    “Gibson alluded to McCain’s recent statement that Alaska’s proximity to Russia lent Palin some expertise on that nation, asking Palin to explain.
    “They’re our next-door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska — from an island in Alaska,” she said.”
    The “porch” line (it was actually “house” if you want to nitpick) is from a Saturday Night Live sketch, which has been all over the internet. It’s a joke. The funny — or sad — thing about the line is how close it is to her actual statement.
    Al Gore did not actually say “I invented the internet.” But it seemed to capture a certain aspect of his personality (arrogant know-it-all) perfectly, which is what the Russia line does with Palin (in way over her head, oblivious).

  9. frankbooth says:

    Hey, wouldja look at this? She elaborated!
    COURIC: You’ve cited Alaska’s proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?
    PALIN: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and on our other side, the land– boundary that we have with– Canada. It– it’s funny that a comment like that was– kind of made to– cari– I don’t know, you know? Reporters–
    COURIC: Mock?
    PALIN: Yeah, mocked, I guess that’s the word, yeah.
    COURIC: Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.
    PALIN: Well, it certainly does because our– our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They’re in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia–
    COURIC: Have you ever been involved with any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?
    PALIN: We have trade missions back and forth. We– we do– it’s very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where– where do they go? It’s Alaska. It’s just right over the border. It is– from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to– to our state.”
    *****
    For some reason this reminds me of:
    “Hawaii is a unique state. It is a small state. It is a state that is by
    itself. It is a — it is different than the other 49 states. Well, all
    states are different, but it’s got a particularly unique situation.”
    C’mon, you guys. McCain could drop dead. Doesn’t this woman scare the shit out of you? Honestly, for real. Quit arguing just to argue and look into your hearts. Is the gloat factor of being able to say “my side wins!” worth it? I mean, would you really win if this person were president?
    If you need any more convincing, even Chuck Norris thinks McCain will die. (Honest, look it up.) And if anyone knows death, it’s the Chuck — because a Chuck Norris-delivered Roundhouse Kick is the preferred method of execution in 16 states.

  10. The Big Perm says:

    Palin is walking satire. Too bad she’s actually up for election. Thanks, Republicans!

  11. CloudsWithoutWater says:

    So, anyone see any movies lately?

  12. frankbooth says:

    No.

  13. RoyBatty says:

    Sarah Palin is that popular girl in high school who is so self-deluded that her popularity in certain circles somehow equates into being right that she doesn’t realize the only reason anyone talks to her is to get into her pants.
    So you listen to her prattle on at a party, the whole while thinking, “Jesus, I hope she is either a good lay or gives great head because listening to this chick babble inanely on is not worth a finger-bang.”
    I might think Condi Rice was woefully unprepared to deal with the new political reality of the post 9/11 world, but I harbor no illusions she could not debate my ass into the dirt on the Eastern Bloc. Did intelligent women flee the GOP after Bush made it clear that qualifications were no longer an asset?

  14. Stella's Boy says:

    Is the kneejerk Palin support just the same thing as what some here claim is blind Obama support, never saying a bad word about him or backing him no matter what? It sure seems the same to me. The media is biased. Criticism is sexist. Blah blah blah. But to piggyback on what frankbooth said, does she really energize anyone here? Wanting to win and partisanship aside, has she really wowed you this last month? Are you impressed with her performance in the Gibson and Couric interviews? As we learn more about her, do you find yourself increasingly believing she was the very best choice? I know the Republicans I live with are not excited about her nor do they think much of her. That doesn’t seem to be uncommon these days. I can understand the extremely conservative wing being pleased with her, the “values voters” crowd, the ones who don’t trust McCain and don’t think he’s solidly behind them on their core issues. But what about the moderates of the party?

  15. leahnz says:

    thanks for posting that link, stella’s boy. parker hits the nail right on the head.

  16. Krazy Eyes says:

    Why am I not surprised that mysteryperfecta didn’t answer my above question? How could he?
    In other news Jack Cafferty gives us his take on the interview. Ouch.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPP_wYeb5bw

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon