MCN Blogs
Kim Voynar

By Kim Voynar Voynar@moviecitynews.com

Keep Fighting

I went to a screening of Cool Hand Luke last night on the WB lot. I’d never seen the film in a theater before, and the digital restoration was absolutely gorgeous. Watching the film, I was struck (again) by Paul Newman’s remarkable screen presence, and how much of it came not from the genetics that made him beautiful to look at, but from his inner light, the soul that filled him. Cool Hand Luke is one of my favorite Newman films, particularly for the way in which he captures the spirit of this man who’s been beaten down by life, doesn’t see much good in it, and yet still has the ability to change the lives of his fellow prisoners with his spirit and tenacity.
I was very torn being at the screening because a very big part of me had wanted to skip it and go instead to the huge Prop 8 protest in West Hollywood. I’d made plans to go to this screening before I even got to LA, and I had a guest coming who I didn’t want to cancel on at the last minute, but still, no matter how great and rare an opportunity it was to see Cool Hand Luke in a theater, my heart was wishing I was at the protest.


As we were leaving the screening, my friend observed that the difference between Cool Hand Luke and The Shawshank Redemption is that in the latter, Andy Dusfresne’s redemption comes from his escape from the prison, whereas in the former, Luke’s redemption comes not from his physical escape, but from his refusal to quit trying to escape, his stubborn insistence on getting back up to fight, even when it seems there’s no chance he can win.
On my way to the screening, I had a rather heated exchange with my cab driver about Prop 8. The driver was a black man who’d immigrated here from Africa over 20 years ago; he’d voted against Prop 8, he said, and was sad that it had passed, but then he said, look, this is a democracy, it’s not perfect, but it’s what we have. And the majority of Californians voted in favor of it, so the gays should just live with it. Why protest? What’s the point? I sat there biting my tongue for a minute, weighing whether I really wanted to get into this discussion in a cab, when I was going to be stuck in there for at least another 10 to fifteen minutes in rush-hour LA traffic. Of course, those who know me well, know that my ability to just bite my tongue is pretty limited, so I plunged in.
I asked him, what if the majority of citizens of California decided to vote on something that limited your life? What if they decreed that cabs can only be driven by people who were born American, not by immigrants? What if they passed a proposition limiting what marriage means for you — that, say, you could not get married because you’re black, or because you’re an immigrant, or because you’re a cab driver? What if the majority of your fellow voters said that you are not equal, that the way you are — because you were born with dark skin, or not born within the US, gave them the right to dictate your life, to tell you that what you are is not okay? Would you still feel that way then?
Would you just meekly nod your head and say, “okay, sure, if that’s what 52% of you say is the way it is, I’ll just go right along with that.” Would you not rage and protest and scream until your voice was hoarse? And he pondered all this, and finally responded that change for black people in America did not happen overnight, it took many, many years for the majority societal mindset to shift and evolve, and that we have to be patient and just keep working for change, but that protests would not do any good. They did for the Civil Rights movement, I said, and then we arrived at my destination, he thanked me for the discussion, and we parted ways.
So last night at the screening, Prop 8 was very much on my mind. But as I watched Newman’s Luke escape, and be shackled, escape again, and be shackled twice and beaten down until he begs for mercy, I thought about the fight for equal rights for same sex couples. Luke is beaten up in a fight, and keeps getting up, again and again, even swinging punches as he’s on the verge of absolute collapse; he keeps fighting, no matter what. Near the end of the film, he digs that ditch and refills it, digs and refills, until he’s finally begging the guards for mercy. And they think they’ve finally got his “mind right,” that they’ve turned Luke, with his natural charm and relentless smile, into their obedient lap dog who will fetch the water, fetch the rifle, fetch the dead turtle from the river. Until he escapes, again. And even at the end, he dies rather than going back, but they never beat him. He dies “smiling that Luke smile.”
That’s what we have to keep doing in the fight for equal rights for gays and lesbians in this country. No matter how many times a discriminatory proposition is passed by the majority, we have to keep getting up out of the dirt and fighting. We have to keep punching back, even when it seems there’s no way to win.

Be Sociable, Share!

4 Responses to “Keep Fighting”

  1. Cadavra says:

    I was there, too. Sorry we missed each other.
    Yeah, you couldn’t make a movie like that today. Too slow, not enough action, and of course, where would you find all those great character actors? šŸ™
    Prop. 8 will not stand. Even if it’s not overturned by the CA Supreme Court, a repeal will be on the ballot in 2010. The cabbie was right: nothing good comes overnight.

  2. yancyskancy says:

    Such a great movie. I saw it a few years ago at the Egyptian with Stuart Rosenberg in attendance for a Q&A. The print wasn’t very good, but at least it was the big screen. The Arclight Sherman Oaks is showing it Nov. 25th as part of their Newman tribute series — wonder if it’s the restored print?
    On election night I went there to see one of my favorite films, The Hustler. Busted my hump to get over there on time, only to learn it had been canceled. And there’s no guarantee it’ll be rescheduled. I’m still moping about that.

  3. Not David Bordwell says:

    “We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the hateful words and actions of the bad people but for the appalling silence of the good people. Human progress never rolls in on wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to be co workers with God, and without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the forces of social stagnation. We must use time creatively, in the knowledge that the time is always ripe to do right.”
    Martin Luther King, Jr., Letter from a Birmingham Jail, 1963

  4. I caught the last little bit of GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER tonight on TCM, and Spencer Tracy’s last words seemed to echo into this fight:
    “I’m sure you know, what you’re up against. There’ll be 100 million people right here in this country who will be shocked and offended and appalled and the two of you will just have to ride that out, maybe every day for the rest of your lives. You could try to ignore those people, or you could feel sorry for them and for their prejudice and their bigotry and their blind hatred and stupid fears, but where necessary you’ll just have to cling tight to each other and say “screw all those people”! Anybody could make a case, a hell of a good case, against your getting married. The arguments are so obvious that nobody has to make them. But you’re two wonderful people who happened to fall in love and happened to have a pigmentation problem, and I think that now, no matter what kind of a case some bastard could make against your getting married, there would be only one thing worse, and that would be if – knowing what you two are and knowing what you two have and knowing what you two feel- you didn’t get married.”
    If you change “pigmentation problem” to “gender problem” you have exactly what we’re going through today. Hopefully one day, same sex marriage will join interracial marriage as a societal norm.

Politics

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” ā€” some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it ā€” I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury ā€” he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” ā€” and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging ā€” I was with her at that moment ā€” she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy namedā€”” “Yeah, sure ā€” you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that Iā€™m on the phone with you now, after all thatā€™s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didnā€™t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. Thereā€™s not a case of that. He wasnā€™t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had ā€” if that were what the accusation involved ā€” the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. Iā€™m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, ā€œYou know, itā€™s not this, itā€™s thatā€? Because ā€” let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. TimesĀ piece, thatā€™s what it lacked. Thatā€™s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon