MCN Blogs
Kim Voynar

By Kim Voynar

New Years Confession #1

Every time the Gran Torino trailer comes on behind me (fourth time today) and Clint growls, “Gettttt offff myyyy laaaaawn,” I break into uncontrollable giggles.
Yes, I am a bad person. Sorry.

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to “New Years Confession #1”

  1. Cadavra says:

    No, you’re not. You’re SUPPOSED to laugh. You think that line was put in there by accident?
    And permit me to respectfully disagree. I think this is Clint’s best performance since UNFORGIVEN, possibly ever. He takes the whole Dirty-Harry-In-Retirement concept and stands it on its ear; it’s also by far his funniest performance (it amazes me how few people pick up on this). The entire picture is in essence his SHOOTIST: aging alpha male burdened by all the killing in his life learns (not a spoiler, folks; they reveal this early on) he has a terminal disease and decides to help out a young man as an act of contrition. It’s a remarkable film.

  2. pchu says:

    Gran Tarino is a comedy. With Clint uttering bad dialogue in a growling manner that actually makes me laugh.
    I could actually see Charles Bronson doing this kind of movie 10 years ago and it would be a straight to video release. Clint almost saved the entire movie. Almost.

  3. Kim Voynar says:

    I hear you, I hear you. But if the trailer comes on the TV, and you’re not looking at it, just listening … it’s pretty damned funny. Then again, my older daughter has been watching Buffy and Angel non-stop, and some of that sounds kind of funny playing in the background too, absent the visuals.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon