MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Kubrick's legacy, ten years on

Kubrick_self_3081816.jpg

Fuck. Simple, declarative, the last word of Stanley Kubrick’s final film, Eyes Wide Shut, which also was the same thing I said when I heard he was dead at 70, ten years ago today. (Not knowing, of course, that was the same breath of his last moment of filmmaking.) Kubricktician Jamie Stuart reminded me that today’s the tenth anniversary of his passing, and served up a mess of links while we’re waiting for the epic 1,900-page “Napoleon” volume to arrive from Taschen this summer. To start, there’s a zip file of images of all of the pages of the original 2001: A Space Odyssey program book, individually photographed like Kubrick remaking the negative of Strangelove one click at a time. Kubrick’s little-seen early short, Day of the Fight (1951) is here. Leon Vitali talks about working with Kubrick here. Want Slavoj Zizek to go all Lacanian on Kubrick? Michael Ciment talks A Clockwork Orange with Kubrick… and Barry Lyndon, as well as The Shining. Watch Scorsese on Kubrick and “the complexity of the human psyche” here. A Charlie Rose roundtable on Stanley Kubrick: A Life in Pictures, with Scorsese, Jan Harlan and Christiane Kubrick here. The “Kubrick blooper reel”. Mogwai’s video for “Stanley Kubrick”. Scripts: A continuity for Dr. Strangelove: Or, How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb. Here’s the 1965 draft of 2001. And Full Metal JacketEyes Wide Shut. And for good measure, my 1999 swoon over Eyes Wide Shut. [H/t to Jamie Stuart for links and hosting the original 2001 booklet.]

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Responses to “Kubrick's legacy, ten years on”

  1. Tom Hall says:

    Man, I miss his work. I really do. Thanks for this reminder, Ray.

  2. T. Holly says:

    I’m going to do some Kubricktian self-portraits and make a face book.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon