MCN Columnists
Mike Wilmington

By Mike Wilmington

Wilmington on DVDs: Gran Torino, Revolution Revisited, The Rain People, and more…


Gran Torino (Four Stars)
U.S.; Clint Eastwood, 2008 (Warner)

Clint Eastwood plays a Dirty Harry guy grown old in his latest movie Gran Torino. And, as we watch C. E.‘s latest screen character in action — a 70s-something widower/misanthrope named Walt Kowalski battling a local street gang — he makes us feel lucky…. Fortunate to get another chance to watch this guy simmer and explode on screen.

It’s been four years since Eastwood last played before the camera, as the gruff fight trainer/manager Frankie Dunn in his heart-breaking Oscar winner Million Dollar Baby. And though he’s greatly enhanced his filmmaking credentials then — with a run of directorial gems in Mystic River, Flags of Our Fathers and Letters from Iwo Jima — it’s a real pleasure to see him pull out once more his trademark squint, acid wisecracks and deadly onscreen disposition.

The real Clint is a gentler, more thoughtful character than Dirty Harry Callahan, Bill Munny, Philo Beddoe, The Man With No Name or any of his other noir or western creations. But on screen actor Clint still seems to relish playing his counterpart: a male fantasy figure, by his own description. That’s what Gran Torino‘s Walt Kowalski is too — but with a difference.

Walt, a Korean War veteran and Ford assembly plant retiree, is a seventy-something Detroit suburbanite, who has few friends, and only a few obnoxious family members left — plus the same foul-mouthed disposition and slow-fuse, deadly temper that old ‘70s antihero detective Harry Callahan had. Walt, who views the world though a grimace, is playing out his last chapter, after his severance from Ford (after a half century), and though he‘s the neighborhood old white male grouch in an increasingly Asian community, he gets pulled, at first against his will, into the problems of the immigrant Asian (Hmong, or Laos or Thailand mountain people) family next door.

These neighbors include an irascible granny, some worried parents, and the Lor family teenagers troubled Thao (Bee Vang) and lively Sue (Ahney Her), two kids who are both being harassed and/or courted by the local Hmong gangbangers — and who cross paths sharply with Walt when those local thugs chivvy Thoa into trying to steal Walt’s precious, beautifully preserved 1972 Gran Torino. Walt, who has as big a repertoire of racial epithets as Harry’s, observes it all and eventually takes sides just as Humphrey Bogart’s Harry Morgan did in To Have and Have Not — not because it’s his job but because he “(likes) you and… doesn’t like them.”

Increasingly, Walt noses into the Lor kids’ scrapes with the local delinquents, mostly Asian or black, — and as usual with the kind of classic revenge or town-taming thriller that Gran Torino becomes, the confrontations get tenser and more explosive. By the time of the movie’s sad, furious climax (which is the only moment here I‘d question), Walt has faced a last battle and director-star Eastwood has notched another late-career revisionist triumph in his six-shooter canon.

It’s easy to look at Gran Torino — which comes from a salty, likable screenplay by Nick Schenck, apparently not written, according to Richard Corliss, with Clint in mind — and dig out all the Dirty Harry connections, tossing kudos to Eastwood for reversing them — which is sort of what I’ve been doing in this review so far. But, despite the obvious mellowing and self-criticism, I’ve always thought Dirty Harry and the “Dollars” Trilogy weren’t as far from Unforgiven and the other late Eastwoods, as some of us like to think. Harry wasn’t really a racist and though the Man may not have had a Name, he certainly had a code.

Gran Torino, seems in some ways a bid to re-establish Clint the star after that four year hiatus, and I think it will. The movie, Eastwood‘s second directorial effort of 2008, is a tad less well-written than Changeling was and less surprising or original as a story. But, with Eastwood calling the shots, it’s another fine piece of classical Hollywood moviemaking: lean and tough and laid out with an almost merciless clarity. It’s also more of a comedy than he’s done in a while. All in the Family and Archie Bunker parallels have been popping up in the reviews as often as Dirty Harry allusions, and the mostly amateur Hmong cast — as well as old pros like John Carroll Lynch as Walt’s equally foul-mouthed barber buddy — give good understated natural performances. Especially the saucily sarcastic Auney Her.

One irony of Eastwood’s later filmography — the movies he‘s been making since Bird, and especially the ones he made starting with Unforgiven — is that his whole major career strategy was based on star power, on using his box-office clout to carve out a directorial career. With Unforgiven (even a little earlier with Bronco Billy, Honkytonk Man and White Hunter, Black Heart) he began sometimes undercutting that star power, playing at times against his carefully crafted macho image. Then, of course, after Baby, Eastwood, for a while, abandoned his screen image entirely and concentrated instead on directing. And though he’s gotten pretty damned good at it, while taking on projects he couldn’t have chosen as a star actor, I like seeing him on screen again. And I don’t think this should be a valedictory. I hope he doesn’t rule out working for other directors. I even hope he makes another Western.

The special kick of watching big, long-career movie stars in a late-inning show, is that we‘re seeing people we feel we know, with whom we share a history, albeit an imaginary one. That’s part of what makes Gran Torino such a richly enjoyable experience. It’s not the best or deepest thing Eastwood has done recently. But Walt is his man, Gran Torino is his vehicle and he knows how to drive them home.



Revolution Revisited (Three-and-a-Half Stars)
U.S.; Hugh Hudson, 1985-2009 (Warner)

Do we sometimes judge movies too quickly, too harshly?

Revolution was a famous critical and audience movie flop. A revisionist take on the American Revolutionary War by star Al Pacino, then-hot director Hugh Hudson (Chariots of Fire), and writer Robert Dillon (The River), it came out, in 1985, the year of Rambo‘s phenomenal success and the heyday of Ronald Reagan, to empty seats and withering critical abuse. (Interestingly, Stallone had campaigned for Pacino‘s part in Revolution and Pacino was offered Rambo before Stallone.) Sustaining that resounding “Thumbs Down,“ Leonard Maltin still lists Revolution as a “Bomb.“

But now, Hudson and Pacino have returned to their 24-year-old film and made some substantial and important changes, including cuts, additions, and the inclusion of a new narration by Pacino‘s character, trapper/soldier Tom Dobb.

Does it help? Decidedly yes. The movie was an ambitious and often stunningly produced tale of Tom, a poor but indomitable Scottish immigrant caught up accidentally in the war, following his adventures and mishaps during the battles from Yorktown to Valley Forge — along with his teenaged son (Dexter Fletcher), a fiery and idealistic girl named Daisy and her Tory mother (Nastassja Kinski and Joan Plowright) and brutal British Sergeant Major Peasy (Donald Sutherland). It was lavishly produced, eagerly awaited. And it was damned on release as a Heaven’s Gate-style catastrophe, derided as pretentious, over-ambitious, over-produced and historically inept.

This response, and the anemic box-office performance which resulted, noticeably damaged Hudson‘s later career. (His movies became fewer and further between, and less marked by the kind of rich epic style which was his métier.) And it also may have helped keep that superb actor Pacino, accused of unwisely straying from the city streets that were his cinematic home ground, off the screen for the next four years.

But just as the first critics were wrong, to some degree, about Heaven‘s Gate (which is pretentious and profligate, but has compensating factors), the nay-sayers were even more wrong about Revolution — a far more dramatically intelligent and physically exciting movie than, for example, the 2000 Mel Gibson Rev War audience hit The Patriot, which Maltin gives three stars. Indeed, Revolution strikes me, in this version, as one of the best and most interesting movies ever made on the Revolutionary War.

The physical production (shot in England, to more critical scorn), action scenes and cinematography are wonderfully done: lush, striking and often explosively physical. The acting has great flourish, emotion and dash, especially when Pacino holds the screen. (The scene where Tom rocks his injured, boy in his arms, trying to will him back to life, is incredible.) This performance, sometimes magnificent, was unfairly castigated. That despised accent, for example, was, according to Pacino, heavily researched, authenticated and taught to him by language experts; it’s not his fault if critics expected Michael Corleone, Frank Serpico or Sonny Wortzik.

In retrospect, the new narration, which often lets Pacino unleash his flair for unashamed poetry and Shakespearean intensity, deepens the role and lyricizes the movie. (Hudson had intended some kind of the narration all along, but was forced by production company Goldcrest to shove the film prematurely into release.)

Far from being a laughable failure, the revised Revolution strikes me as close to a masterpiece. I missed the movie on its first release, largely because of those reviews, but the admirers of even that earlier version aren’t exactly chopped liver; they include Martin Scorsese and Oliver Stone. So I hope this fine, very underrated, often terrific movie will find its audience now, that Pacino’s greatness in the role will be finally recognized, and that Hudson gets a chance to direct the kinds of movies that have eluded him, after Revolution met its undeserved critical massacre in the year of Rambo, 1985.

Extras: Conversation with Pacino and Hudson, trailer.

The Rain People (Three-and-a-Half Stars)
U. S.; Francis Coppola, 1969 (Warner Archive)

Three years before The Godfather, the young (29) Hollywood phenom Francis Coppola — with two splashy directorial jobs (You’re a Big Boy Now, Finian‘s Rainbow) and several prestige scripts (This Property is Condemned, Is Paris Burning?) under his belt — decided to hit the road with a band of like-minded young Hollywood rebels, including Walter Murch and George Lucas, to shoot his own version of an picaresque neo-realist American film. His hand-picked and very promising cast included young James Caan, as a sweet, brain-damaged ex-college football star named Killer, Robert Duvall as a sexy motorcycle cop who lives in a trailer camp with his young daughter, and, in the demanding central role, Shirley Knight as pregnant young Long Island wife Natalie Ravenna, who flees her husband, her parents and her life, to try to discover or heal herself on the road.

The result is one of Coppola‘s best but lesser-seen films and personal favorites — and an example, like 1974‘s The Conversation, of the kind of film he probably most wanted to make, before the world-wide success of 1972‘s The Godfather set him on a different, more elaborate and dangerous road. The Rain People, befitting its title, is moody, perceptive and very smart — and in love with both its shifting landscapes and the flawed, lonely but very alive people who pass through them. It suggests the work of a writer like Tennessee Williams, Carson McCullers or Horton Foote, handled by a director like Robert Mulligan or Arthur Penn. Except for one brief wedding party scene, it doesn’t really suggest The Godfather. But, once you watch it, and justly celebrate the young filmmaking community who made it, you’ll see Coppola in a different light, more soulful, more compassionate, a lover of the lost and the wounded.



Blue Murder (Three Stars)
U.K.; Various Directors, 2008 (Acorn Media)

More good British mystery from Acorn: this time a six episode season of one the current British audience cop thriller hits, Blue Murder — with Caroline Quentin as Manchester police boss and single mom Janine Lewis. Series creator Cath Staincliffe and the other writers give the show a nice balance between pungent street suspense and affecting domestic drama. The supporting cast is typical quality/Brit, (Ian Kelsey, Paul Loughran, Nicholas Murchie and Belinda Everett as Lewis‘ crew), and the direction (Juliet May, David Drury, and Sue Tully) is crisp, economical and vividly detailed. At the center, Quentin plays quite a cop and quite a mom; she‘s believable and admirable in both roles.

Includes: Private Sins: Parts I & 2 (U. K.; Juliet May, 2008). Tooth and Claw (U.K.; Sue Tully, 2009); Having It All (U.K.; David Drury, 2008). This Charming Man (U.K.; 2008). Inside (U.K.; 2008).



The International (Three Stars)
U.S.; Tom Tykwer, 2009 (Sony)

Bad timing, anyone?

Is The International, director Tom Tykwer’s smash-bang high finance thriller, Clive Owen and Naomi Watts fight a huge corrupt world-wide bank with a penchant for political chicanery and hired assassins. But is this evil bank and its murderous nabobs really beside the point, now that big banks everywhere have gone kerflooey, and the movie-going public is constantly assaulted in real life by mortgage madness, financial foolishness, dangerous derivatives, bailout blues, and yowling TV pundits ranting about taxes?

Maybe. This one starts off in Berlin, where our sexy/scruffy hero, Interpol agent and ex-Scotland Yard tough guy Louis Salinger (Owen, at his Bogeyest) has found a whistle-blower inside the rich-and-rotten-as-hell IBBC, a.k.a. International Bank of Business and Credit. (IBBC is based on the real life, scandal-ridden and now defunct BCCI, or Bank of Credit and Commerce International, which went belly-up, after years of shady deals, in 1991).

Soon, both the whistle blower and the agent are dead, and Louis and his fellow bank-tracker, earnest New York City Assistant D. A. Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) are up to their ears in mayhem, running all over the globe in pursuit of slick, villainous financiers and their professional assassins — including Brian O’Byrne as a chief killer named The Consultant, Ulrich Thomsen as hunky double-dealing financier Jonas Skarssen, Patrick Baladi as one of those typical well-behaved little corporate creeps you’re always running into (this one named White), and the great German actor Armin Mueller-Stahl as the menacing mutterer, Wilhelm Wexler.

The plot is complex and full of formula political thriller stuff. But The International also has tangy locations (Istanbul, Milan, Lyon, Berlin, Manhattan), and it’s so packed with characters that three ensemble movies could have been stuffed into it without a button popping. It’s also a good arena for Tykwer’s (Run Lola Run) snazzy technique. Here, he’s reunited with virtuoso Lola cinematographer Frank Griebe and they give us another set of wild rides –including what may be the wildest in of any movie this year: a mad Guggenheim Museum shootout, starting with a tense street pursuit, and ending with assassins and cops blazing away all over the Guggenheim‘s twisty circular ramp, before exhibits and video installations. Staged to the nines on a look-alike replica of the Guggenheim recreated on a Berlin soundstage, it‘s so kinetic and blow-you-out-of-your seat razzle-dazzly, that it redeems the whole movie.

Clive Owen is the actor I would have chosen as the next James Bond. (I’m not saying I would have been right.) And he’s good in this kind of hard-edged, sad-eyed neo-noir tough guy role. Naomi Watts deserves more. O’Byrne and Mueller-Stahl are neat heavies: O’Byrne looks a bit like the younger Bob Newhart turned button-down killer. (You wouldn’t want to meet this guy in a board room.) And Mueller-Stahl has another of his patented ice-cold killer-philosopher roles. (You wouldn’t want to meet this guy in a seminar.)

The International had to be reshot for action, so it has bloodshed aplenty. The other big set pieces include a Milan political assassination, and a chase in Istanbul, through mosque and on rooftop, that reminded me a little of Melville‘s “La Samourai.” But the Gugghenheim shootout is the killer here. Hopefully, you‘ll also recall, while watching this, that politicos and bankers always have their own accounts to settle.

Crossing Over (Two-and-a-Half Stars)
U. S.; Wayne Kramer, 2009 (Weinstein Company)

Writer-director Wayne Kramer goes the Short Cuts-Crash- L. A. kaleidoscope route in this okay message drama about the pitfalls and evils of U. S. immigration policy and urban racism. It’s a multi-ethnic ensemble movie, but Harrison Ford is the obvious star, playing Max Brogan, an old Immigration and Customs cop, who’s gotten disillusioned about the callousness and human wreckage of his job. And who wouldn’t be upset the way the deck is stacked here — in a series of crises and predicaments calculated to sadden or madden anyone but the knee-jerk acolytes of our old pals Blimp Rushbomb, Glenn The Grinning Wreck Beck, and Sean the Sham Hammity?

Illegal alien Mexican moms are arrested and pulled from their children. Chinese-American teens are sucked into street crime. Iranian-American high school girls speak up unwisely in class about the causes of terrorism, and get their whole family split up and deported. And an evil immigration guy, Cole Frankel (Ray Liotta) trades a green cards for sex with Aussie actress Claire (Alice Eve) — while his idealistic lawyer wife Denise (Ashley Judd) tries futilely to save that beleaguered Iranian family. Meanwhile, everyone keeps crossing paths, sometimes with drawn guns.

It’s all wildly melodramatic, and those incessant coincidental meetings would be implausible even if they all lived in say, Green Bay. L. A., on the other hand, is a big city. But the movie’s heart, albeit scattered, is in the right place. And you can understand why Kramer, born in South Africa, is exercised about racism. Kramer is the writer-director of that tangy Las Vegas drama, The Cooler, and he knows how to keep a story whipping along. Unfortunately, he’s directed these scenes much better than he’s written them.

Ford is right to start making some smaller, more thoughtful movies and taking paterfamilias roles. Crossing Over is no Short Cuts, and no Crash either. It’s closer in quality to Ford’s recent flawed Ron Shelton cop thriller vehicle Hollywood Homicide. But it’s a good thing that filmmakers like Kramer take a whack at these more potentially rich or substantial ensemble stories. There are worse things than trying to make a good liberal message movie. Like listening to Sean the Sham, Glenn the Wreck Beck or his blobbiness, The Blimp himself.

Nobel Son (Two Stars)
U.S.; Randall Miller, 2007 (Fox)

Alan Rickman probably has the nastiest sneer in the business, and he gets to use it nearly nonstop in Nobel Son, a would-be dark comic thriller that didn‘t quite crib the right formulas. Writer- director Randall Miller (of the well-regarded Bottle Shock) here casts Rickman as Eli Michaelson, a newly-awarded Nobel Prize winning chemist. Though in the bloom of his fame, Eli is actually such a foul human being — philanderer, exploiter, cad and thief — that he winds up the target of a kidnapper named Thaddeus James (Shawn Hatosy), a meticulous psychopath who abducts Eli‘s nicer son Barkley (Bryan Greenberg) and starts a cascade of revelations that expose Eli for the swine he is.

Also involved in the action are Eli‘s cheated-on wife Sarah (Mary Steenburgen), a prying detective (Bill Pullman), an obsessive-compulsive gardener (Danny De Vito) and a Village bombshell poetess named City Hall (Eliza Dushku). That’s a damned good cast, and a motley character assortment, but Nobel Son lacks the panache and style — and sheer narrative smarts — of a truly dark ensemble comedy, like Kind Hearts and Coronets, The Ladykillers or Dr. Strangelove or something nourish by the Coens.

Dubious strategies abound. Why does Thaddeus kidnap Barkley, a slam-dunk job, instead of Eli himself? Putting Eli in Thaddeus‘ clutches would allow us more sneering space and a proper comeuppance for the prize-winning cad. And it would eliminate even more ridiculous crimes later on.

Anyway, despite a brisk pace and attractive cast, Nobel Son left me cold. Never mind Eli. The movie is nasty itself, mostly because of its smug younger generation. Brutal Thaddeus. Doofus Barkley. Even as alternatives to the odious Eli, they‘re dopey. Now, I realize dark comedies aren’t supposed to be charm schools. (Or ballrooms). But the plot isn’t brainy or sophisticated enough to compensate. If one more character got kidnapped, I was ready to abduct myself out of there.

By the way, I would have changed this movie’s title too — to Nobel Savage.

Labou (Two-and-a-Half Stars)
U.S.; Greg Aronowitz, 2006 (MGM)

A cute, good-looking little movie — maybe too cute at times — about three dauntless Southern kids (Bryan James Kitto, Darnell J. Hamilton, Marissa Cuevas) who try to beat a couple of nasty speculators to the legendary pirates’ treasure of the local Louisiana swamp, which is guarded by ghostly buccaneer Capt. Lerouge and an adorable little green, perky swamp creature named (you guessed it) Labou — a being just made for duplication in a doll store.

Children should have fun with this. Adults may wander in and out — though they’ll probably be amused by the typecasting of the actor who plays the mayor: New Orleans‘ C. Ray Nagin. Aronowitz has talent, though he should sharpen his handling of actors; the cast, including Mayor Ray, make The Apple Dumpling Gang look like a masterpiece of subtle realism. This was a prize winner at the Chicago International Children‘s Film Festival.

Extras: Commentary by Aronowitz and others; six featurettes.

Pride of the Marines (Three Stars)
U. S.; Delmer Daves, 1945 (Warner Archive)

Black List victim Albert Maltz wrote this moving fact-based WW2 bio drama, about Marine Sgt. Al Schmid (John Garfield), who was blinded in battle, and had to struggle to readjust. You’ll be hard put to find any Communist propaganda here; this is fine rousing wartime flag-waving stuff, very good of its Clifford Odets-ish kind, with a prickly, dedicated lead performance by Garfield — another Black List victim. With Eleanor Parker, Dane Clark and Rosemary DeCamp.


Woodstock (40th Anniversary Director’s Cut) (Original Version: Four Stars)
U.S.; Michael Wadleigh, 1970-2009 (Warner)

– Michael Wilmington
June 9, 2009

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.


awesome stuff. OK I would like to contribute as well by sharing this awesome link, that personally helped me get some amazing and easy to modify. check it out at All custom premade files, many of them totally free to get. Also, check out Dow on: Wilmington on DVDs: How to Train Your Dragon, Treasure of the Sierra Madre, The Darjeeling Limited, The Films of Nikita Mikhalkov, The Hangover, The Human Centipede and more ...

cool post. OK I would like to contribute too by sharing this awesome link, that personally helped me get some amazing and easy to customize. check it out at All custom templates, many of them dirt cheap or free to get. Also, check out Downlo on: Wilmington on Movies: I'm Still Here, Soul Kitchen and Bran Nue Dae

awesome post. Now I would like to contribute too by sharing this awesome link, that personally helped me get some beautiful and easy to modify. take a look at All custom premade files, many of them free to get. Also, check out DownloadSoho.c on: MW on Movies: The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest, Paranormal Activity 2, and CIFF Wrap-Up

Carrie Mulligan on: Wilmington on DVDs: The Great Gatsby

isa50 on: Wilmington on DVDs: Gladiator; Hell's Half Acre; The Incredible Burt Wonderstone

Rory on: Wilmington on Movies: Snow White and the Huntsman

Andrew Coyle on: Wilmington On Movies: Paterson

tamzap on: Wilmington on DVDs: The Magnificent Seven, Date Night, Little Women, Chicago and more …

rdecker5 on: Wilmington on DVDs: Ivan's Childhood

Ray Pride on: Wilmington on Movies: The Purge: Election Year

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon