MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

DP/30 – Avatar composer James Horner

mp3 of the interview

Be Sociable, Share!

5 Responses to “DP/30 – Avatar composer James Horner”

  1. Josh Massey says:

    Was I the only one who noticed his Avatar score completely cribbed his work on Glory? I mean, it was note-for-note at times.
    I’m not necessarily complaining, as Glory has what’s probably my favorite score of all time. But it just seemed so blatant.

  2. Tofu says:

    Horner actually notes how that type of cribbing is less tolerated in his field, as compared to other forms of art.
    DP, I’d wager the Dark Knight score is actually quite memorable once listened to solely. With the film? Yes, not as much.
    Good discussion on melodies, by the way. John Williams is rightfully the king of such, and Horner recognizes this here. He should release all those themes he spoke of being cut out as a album itself.

  3. TheJackSack says:

    With all due respect to Horner’s prolific career, he is notorious for not only self-plagiarizing but also downright taking pieces from classical compositions. It’s not an uncommon practice, but Horner is more frequent a practitioner than others. Don’t get me wrong, even John Williams tooketh from Jaws and gaveth to Black Sunday, etc. (Jerry Goldsmith duplicated cues a lot as well) but there’s a fine line between a signature style and copying and pasting your work. Horner has done some great work in spite of this practice, but I think his legacy is diminished when compared to his contemporaries.

  4. palmtree says:

    Exactly, JackSack!
    But there are still good scores he did the first time around…when he was writing the music he would eventually self-plagarize.
    The three that come to mind are:
    Star Trek II (& III)
    Field of Dreams

  5. victoria says:

    I have a profound respect for Horner, and his musical instinct. I think he truly composes from the heart, and let it be said that the man knows how the music feels. There are certain chord progressions that create a particular mood. And if you have ever taken and analyzed a Horner score, you would see a weaving of counter melodies, that unless dutifully studied, would be missed by a simply hearing. Indeed, I worry that the generation of beautiful, thoughtful melodic contours in film will be lost to the new generation of “music.” Frankly, I like the lush scores that come from the mind and heart.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon