MCN Columnists
David Poland

By David Poland

Actor Charts – 19 Weeks To Go – 10/21/10

Actor – Film
Colin Firth – The King’s Speech
Jsmes Franco – 127 Hours
Jesse Eisenberg – The Social Network
Jeff Bridges – True Grit
Robert Duvall – Get Low
Mark Wahlberg – The Fighter
Jack Nicholson – How Do You Know
Javier Bardem – Biutiful
Ryan Gosling – Blue Valentine
Leo DiCaprio – Inception
Kevin Spacey – Casino Jack
Robert DeNiro – Stone
Aaron Johnson – Nowhere Boy
Actor – Film
Geoffrey Rush – The King’s Speech
Matt Damon – True Grit
Josh Brolin – True Grit
Andrew Garflied – The Social Network
Christian Bale – The Fighter
Armie Hammer – The Social Network
Paul Rudd or Owen Wilson – How Do You Know
Jeremy Renner – The Town
Bill Murray- Get Low
John Malkovich – Red/Secretariat
Due Date – Zach Galifianakis
Harrison Ford – Morning Glory

by David Poland

Previous Chart

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Responses to “Actor Charts – 19 Weeks To Go – 10/21/10”

  1. Dignan says:

    No Mark Ruffalo for supporting for Kids Are All Right?

  2. hcat says:

    Isn’t Nicholson a supporting role in How Do You Know? From the trailer it looked like Rudd was the lead.

Review: Little Women (no spoilers) - The Hot Blog

Box Office First Look - The Hot Blog

Why You Should Be Afraid Of The End Of The Paramount Decree - The Hot Blog

Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free) - The Hot Blog

I Should Be Doing Box Office - The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon