MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

DP/30 Sneak Peek: Winter’s Bone actor Jennifer Lawrence

Be Sociable, Share!

9 Responses to “DP/30 Sneak Peek: Winter’s Bone actor Jennifer Lawrence”

  1. LexG says:

    YEP YEP.

    LOOK AT HER.

  2. leahnz says:

    she’s such a cutie-pie. seems a normal, clever, level-headed kid

  3. I enjoyed this very much. She was so spontaneous and authentic. Very present, right in the moment. I appreciated her outright honesty about Hollywood. (Doesnt everyone feel that way? I sure do.) It’s pretty obvious, right here; why she is such a good actress. She is not afraid to be what is, who she is, and absolutely accurate in her communication about it. She isn’t tainting her answers or her attitude, with any agenda. Nor any care about “the right answer”. No sales or marketing toward Oscar points. She’s not even being , commonly, flirty. This is actually a rich little rare nugget of an interview.

  4. hcat says:

    This comes in the mail today and I can’t wait to watch this. Hopefully Hollywood is able to find projects that will support her talent, we seem to get one of these It Girls every two years or so and would love to see her be able to build on her acclaim like Page and Mulligan instead of drift off to the margins like Abbie Cornish, Emily Blunt, or Eva Green.

  5. actionman says:

    can’t wait to finally see Winter’s Bone (blu ray shipped today from netflix)
    she was great as the young Charleze in The Burning Plain

  6. NickF says:

    Good snippet. I highly anticipate the full video

  7. sanj says:

    i noticed that the dp/30 with actors under 30 are just more
    fun .. so this is like Emma Stone DP/30 part 2 without Emma
    Stone

    do you think she’ll even remember this interview by the time she has to do 100 interviews for the next xmen movie
    with the comic con crowd ?

  8. LexG says:

    SANJ = COMIC GOLD.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon