MCN Columnists
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Best Picture Chart – 16 Weeks To Go – 11/11/10

BEST PICTURE
Picture
Studio
Director

Stars
Comment
The Ten, If I Had To Pick Today
Dec 25
True Grit
Par
Coens
Bridges
Brolin
Damon
Nov
24
The King’s Speech
TWC
Hooper
Firth
Dec 1
Black Swan
FxSch
Aronofsky
Portman
Oct 1 The Social Network
Sony
Fincher
Eisenberg
Nov 5
127 Hours
FxSch
Boyle
Franco
June 18
Toy Story 3
Disney
Unkrich
July 9
The Kids Are All Right
Focus
Cholodenko
Bening
Moore
Ruffalo
Dec 29
Another Year
SPC
Leigh
Manville
July 16 Inception
WB
Nolan
DiCaprio
Oct 22
Hereafter
WB
Eastwood
Damon
The Next Tiers Of Likely
Dec 10
The Fighter
Par/Rel
O. Russell
Wahlberg
June 11 Winter’s Bone
RdAtt
Granik
Lawrence
Sept 17
The Town
WB
Affleck

Renner

Dec 29
Biutiful
RdAtt

Gonzalez-

Inarritu

Bardem
Feb 19
Shutter Island
Par
Scorsese
DiCaprio
July 30
Get Low
SPC
Schneider
Duvall
Spacek
Murray
Sept 15
Never Let Me Go
FxSch
Romanek
Mulligan
Dec 25 Somewhere
Focus
Coppola

Dorff
Fanning

Nov 19
Made In Dagenham
SPC
Cole
Hawkins
Dec 31
Blue Valentine
TWC
Cianfrance
Gosling
Williams
Dec 17
Everything You’ve Got
Sony
Brooks
Witherspoon
Nicholson
Nov 24
Love & Other Drugs
Fox
Zwic
Hathaway
Dec 29
The Way Home
NewMkt
Weir
Farrell

November 11, 2010


by David Poland


Be Sociable, Share!

One Response to “Best Picture Chart – 16 Weeks To Go – 11/11/10”

  1. Keil Shults says:

    Hate to always do this, but it’s The Way Back, not The Way Home. And despite your difficulty recalling its proper title, I think its chances of making the Top 10 are greater than your list suggests. At any rate, I hope you’re right about Black Swan. I haven’t even seen it yet, but I’m sure it will be great, and if so, it’d be a shame to see it dismissed for being too dark, bizarre, and/or edgy.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon