By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

Horrible Bosses: Enter for a chance to win!

 
 

The Rules Contest Rules: Drawing July 22, 2011 from entries received no later
5:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. You may enter once per day. One prize per person.

Be Sociable, Share!

25 Responses to “Horrible Bosses: Enter for a chance to win!”

  1. Jodi Showers says:

    Love the shirts and the water guns! Well, I love it all but am especially impressed with those shirts!

  2. Yvonne Huff says:

    I hope to see the movie. Such great prizes!

  3. Joanne Willey says:

    Cant wait to see the movie! Great contest!

  4. Jill L says:

    We would have some fun with those water guns. Looks like a funny movie.

  5. Ann F says:

    I’d love to win! Please enter me into the giveaway

  6. dan williams says:

    nice giveaway

  7. TIM TRUEBLOOD says:

    MAKE ME A WINNER

  8. Linda Messina says:

    This a great giveaway! Please enter me to win!

  9. Sylvie says:

    Winner, winner chicken dinner

  10. Donna L says:

    This movie sounds like a very funny movie. Can’t wait to see it.

  11. Eva Mack says:

    fun to work

  12. Paul Koivisto says:

    Need those water guns to keep these kids in line!

  13. Karla B says:

    Amazing giveaway…. Good luck everybody…. This movie look so funny.. Jen Aniston have to be de most horrible boss in a movie LOL

  14. Sweet Prize pack!

  15. amanda says:

    sweet!

  16. lknott says:

    This sounds like my kind of movie!!! Thanks for the Giveaway!!!

  17. Leslie says:

    My principal could use a squirt!

  18. Looking forward to seeing this!

  19. Tiffanie M. says:

    I am dying to see this movie with my sisters!

  20. Katie S. says:

    Mmmmmm pong ping set or maybe the lunch cooler. I’d have to win to find out which is better. Looks like a funny movie, thanks.

  21. Shari Klyn says:

    Accomplishing the impossible means only that the boss will add it to your regular duties. ~Doug Larson

  22. lknott says:

    I want to see this movie!! This is soo– true about terrible bosses. Wouldn’t it be fun to share some of these items with Your Boss!!!!!!

  23. Dana Hardy says:

    Completly awesome. I died laughing when I saw those! I Love it all!!

  24. susan smoaks says:

    i love it

  25. jan olson says:

    HORRIBLE BOSSES,

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon