By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

“Harry Potter” Is Already Fandango’s Top Ticket-Seller of the Year, Selling Out 5,000 Showtimes Before Its Friday Opening

“Deathly Hallows: Part 2” is Trending to Become #2 Top Pre-Seller in Fandango History

LOS ANGELES, July 13, 2011 – Although there are two more days before the July 15 release date, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2” has already leaped over the year’s previous box office winners to become Fandango’s top-selling title of the year so far.

Fandango has sold more tickets for “Part 2” than it has sold for any other movie this year, including pre-release and post-release ticket sales.

Fandango’s Top 5 Ticket-Sellers of the Year (as of July 13, 2011):

1. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

2. “The Hangover Part II”

3. “Transformers: Dark of the Moon”

4. “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides”

5. “Bridesmaids”

“Part 2” is also on track to become the #2 advance ticket-seller in Fandango’s eleven-year history, following “The Twilight Saga: New Moon.”

Fandango’s Top 5 All-Time Pre-Sellers (by day’s end on July 13, 2011):

1. “The Twilight Saga: New Moon”(2009)

2. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2(2011)

3. “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse”(2010)

4. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1″(2010)

5. “Star Wars: Episode III- Revenge of the Sith”(2005)

The final adventure of the “Harry Potter” franchise is currently conjuring up 91% of daily ticket sales on Fandango, the nation’s leading moviegoer destination. More than 5,000 showtimes for the film are already sold out across the country, with theater owners continually posting additional show times to meet the fan demand in all the fifty states.

“It’s our fastest-selling movie of the year and our best-selling ‘Potter’ movie of all time,” says Fandango Executive Vice President and General Manager Rick Butler. “So many film fans grew up with ‘Harry Potter’ and want to celebrate the series conclusion together on the big screen. The first ‘Potter’ helped put advance ticketing on the map in 2001, so in some ways, Fandango as a company grew up with ‘Potter’ as well. It’s fitting that the grand finale would break records with fans on our Web site and mobile applications.”

About Fandango

Fandango, the nation’s leading moviegoer destination, sells tickets to more than 16,000 screens. Fandango entertains and informs consumers with reviews, commentary and trailers, and offers the ability to quickly select a film, plan where and when to see it, and conveniently buy tickets in advance. Fandango is available at www.fandango.com, via your wireless mobile device at mobile.fandango.com, and at 1-800-FANDANGO. Fandango’s top-ranking movie ticketing apps, with more than 16 million downloads, are available on the iPhone, iPad, Android, Blackberry, Palm, Windows Phone 7 and many other platforms.

# # #

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon