MCN Blogs
Kim Voynar

By Kim Voynar Voynar@moviecitynews.com

Things with Weddings

I’ve been a little swamped lately with last minute details for my daughter Meg’s wedding on July 23. Being financially strapped 20-somethings has forced Meg and her fiance Dick to plan their wedding creatively while still making it memorable. She’s gotten a lot of ideas off Offbeat Bride, and I’ve been really impressed with the ideas she’s incorporated to give the wedding a unique stamp.

Meg and Dick are comic geeks, so their friend Trudi Scruggs made a comic book invite (left) and this “Save the Date” comic panel for them. She totally captured Meg and Dick’s personalities, too. The officiant will double as the DJ, the cake and cupcakes are being made by a friend and her mom, a friend who’s trying to start up a brewery is making the beer, another friend is cooking the brisket for the BBQ at the wedding reception, yet another is serving as the photographer.

We’re setting up an inexpensive photobooth using Mike’s laptop, this software, and a photo printer, so that guest can have a keepsake and Meg and Dick can put everyone’s silly photostrips into their scrapbook.

The wedding itself will be a smallish, simple affair of 100 guests in an inexpensive (seriously, you’d be surprised how inexpensive if you saw it), but lovely venue that’s on the National Historic Register. The venue is two blocks from the Kirkland waterfront, so the wedding party will walk down to the water for pictures after the ceremony. Meg’s expensive veil and tiara were stolen out of the moving van when they moved to their new apartment, so she decided to make her own veil, a birds nest veil with a fascinator.

Last night we had a craft night with Dick’s mom Tess and the bridesmaids to make the bouquets. Meg decided she wanted bouquets that would be awesome looking and keepsakey, so we used a tutorial to make paper roses. The petals were punched out of pages of a copy of Anne’s House of Dreams, the Anne of Green Gables book where Anne and Gilbert finally get married. The Anne series is Meg’s favorite, as it is mine (if she and Dick ever have a little daughter, they will name her Cordelia Anne).

We sprayed the paper roses with a red floral spray that gave them the color we wanted, while still allowing the words to show through a little. Then after that dried, we sprayed a coat of red Glitter Blast to give them some sparkle. The finished roses went on stems of floral wire, and then Meg and her bridesmaids will add sequins and black or silver glitter, silver silk rosebuds, black feathers, and black and silver ribbon to custom design their own bouquets. Neve, Dick’s mom and I made fascinators for our hair and a corsage for my mom while we were there.
This is how they came out, I really like how they look.

We’re two weeks off from the wedding today. We’ve bought everything for the fiesta-themed rehearsal dinner other than the food, and I’m almost done finalizing the menu for that. Bouquets are getting done. Meg’s dress is almost done being altered. My dress (long, pewter-silver, strapless and flowy) is hanging in my closet. Everything is organized for the wedding and reception, with an organized punchlist of to-dos for that. The bachelor and bachelorette bashes are planned. The honeymoon weekend hotel for Meg and Dick in downtown Seattle has been reserved, and tickets to the Capitol Hill Block Party purchased; their more official honeymoon is in Vegas over Labor Day weekend, courtesy of Dick’s dad. We’ve got two more frantic weeks of last-minute things to do, and then the rush of wedding day celebrating, and then it will be over and my daughter will be Meg Phillips. And we couldn’t be happier to be adding Dick, who’s a wonderful and kind partner to Meg and a great stepdad for my grandson Brandon, to our family tree. Happy wedding, Meg and Dick … 14 days and counting.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon