MCN Blogs
Kim Voynar

By Kim Voynar Voynar@moviecitynews.com

Wake Me When It’s Over

God, I hate summer movie season.

Love summer for the downtime, going to the beach with the kids, 4th of July fireworks, cookouts. Hate summer for the summer tentpoles, most of which I have no interest in at all, and the boring news cycles.

I wrote on Facebook this afternoon:

I was just over on deadline.com and there is nothing — zero, zilch, nada — on that site that I even remotely care about reading. You can have a zillion headlines that start with TOLDJA and I still wouldn’t care. Ditto for any number of other movie sites right now. I’m sure I’ll get over my malaise around time for TIFF when the movies are more interesting, but for now? Pffffffft. Do. Not. Care. About 99% of what’s passing for “news” on movie sites.

Yes, I’m being a bit melodramatic. Yes, you personally are awesome. If you are one of my friends (and very likely, even if you aren’t, with a very few exceptions) everything you write is probably terrific. It’s just that it feels like so many movie sites are writing about the same stories, over and over again and everyone desperately trying to put a little spin on it to make it interesting.

Transformers 3 either sucks or does not suck, depending who you ask. Unsurprisingly, it’s making a ton of money either way, which just goes to show … whatever it goes to show. People dig giant robots and explosions and tits and ass and Shia. Not really a news flash. David didn’t hate it, though, so perhaps when the kids insist on seeing it on PPV I’ll sit through it.

Johnny Depp might sign on for another Pirates flick and make another big paycheck. So long as he also makes good movies, who cares? I liked the first Pirates okay, the second was meh, didn’t see the third, likely won’t see the fourth.

I was way more interested in seeing how Azazel Jacobs’ Terri would do — a respectable over-$13K per screen on six screens in NY and LA, and hopefully it will have a strong showing as it expands. It was one of my favorite movies out of Sundance and, I thought, a really solid somewhat higher-budget effort out of Jacobs, whose Momma’s Man and The Good Times Kid were pretty definitively really good, low-budget indie fare.

It’s always tricksy when very indie directors find success and more funding … will they retain what made their voice unique once the headaches that come with bigger budget productions start pushing back against unrestrained creativity? Because, as another well-known indie filmmaker said to me recently, the most befuddling thing is when you’re an indie writer/director and you knock it out of the park, and everyone loves you, and then people with money come knocking … but then they want to control everything and tell you what you can do and how you can do it, and take away the very freedom and creativity that allowed you to make something that caught their attention in the first place. It is, as they say, a conundrum of this business.

I did dig the hell out of Super 8, which is one of my favorite bigger movies of the year so far. I just got a screener of Crime After Crime, which I’m looking forward to watching maybe later tonight. And okay, I am looking forward to the final Harry Potter. My 14YO pointed out the other day that she and her siblings don’t really remember life before there was a new Harry Potter to look forward to. She will probably cry when the credits roll on the last one, and maybe I will, too.

After Harry Potter gets done, we’ll have Captain America, which thankfully opens the same weekend as my daughter’s wedding, so I have a great excuse not to see it unless everyone and their brother is over the moon about it. And then the next week brings The Smurfs, and criminy, does anyone really want to see that movie? Even two-year-olds? Anyone? I thought not. Good, so it’s not just me.

There is Cowboys and Aliens that same weekend, and maybe that won’t suck. And then Planet of the Apes, which looks like they stole the first half from Project Nim. I swear, when I first saw the trailer I thought it actually was a narrative take on Project Nim until it got to the part where the apes are going apeshit and running all over cars and threatening people. That one potentially could have some interesting philosophical underpinnings if they didn’t screw it up by being all about the Cool! Effects! And Flipping Cars! — and if there aren’t any apes transforming into robots and destroying Chicago.

Moving onto the rest of August, we have 30 Minutes or Less, which I would be completely uninterested in except that it stars Jesse Eisenberg, who has tended to make pretty good script choices. So call that one a maybe. That weekend also has the limited release of The Last Circus, which I recommend you see under the influence of something. At least a high-carb meal. It is messed up and kind of all over the place, but if you see it with a mentally altered, packed crowd, it kind of works. And you can quote me on that.

Then we have One Day (another big maybe, I love Anne Hathaway but her script choices are sometimes dicey. See: Bride Wars), Conan the Barbarian (why?), the newest Spy Kids (ditto), Columbiana (That one sounds a bit like Hanna, doesn’t it? With the young girl assassin?), The Debt (another maybe) and Our Idiot Brother (heard decent things about that one).

That’s about it for the rest of summer. Then we can move on to fall and the awards season rush, and hopefully in spite of all the Oscar hooplah there will be some great movies to watch. Until then, we’re stuck with a revolving door of mostly non-news and mostly mediocre movies. I’m gonna take a nap. Wake me when it’s September, will you?

Be Sociable, Share!

One Response to “Wake Me When It’s Over”

  1. Lisa says:

    Midnight in Paris is pretty terrific. Had high expectations going in and it completely blew me away.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon