MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

Trailer: Carnage

Be Sociable, Share!

8 Responses to “Trailer: Carnage”

  1. AnneMi says:

    I’m so excited for this! Looking forward to something a bit lighter from Polanski. Also the cast is pretty amazing.

  2. Sara says:

    WOW, the ladies dominate

  3. Mike says:

    God, this feels like a play.
    not that there’s anything wrong with that.

  4. palmtree says:

    Ironically, the play also suffers from this problem.

  5. LexG says:

    Gandolfini was a FORCE OF NATURE in the play, and good as Reilly is, they’re some enormous shoes to fill. He pretty much WAS the play, and I don’t think Waltz brings the same WASPy dickishness as Jeff Daniels, either.

    The other thing is, it’s so, so, so minor. The play is fun especially as a chance to see four big stars have a 90-minute blowout, but there’s not much “there” there, and not really a movie in it.

  6. JKill says:

    I have zero knowledge of the play but I have to say that looks kind of incredible, the performances look wonderful, and that trailer is genuinely funny. It kind of brings to mind what I dub the Mike Nichols Hateful Relationship Trilogy (WAOVW, CARNAL KNOWLEDGE, CLOSER), all of which I’m a fan of.

  7. cadavra says:

    I saw the play on Broadway, and it IS “Virginia Woolf”–two middle-class couples, one older than the other, get drunk and scream insults at each other for an hour and a half. I enjoyed it, but let’s not kid ourselves that it’s anything more than that.

  8. Tofu says:

    I guffawed pretty hard while watching. Pretty hard, indeed. 🙂

    Anyways, Polankski = take all my money, hell have the wallet.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon