MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Posted Tuesday, November 29th, 2011 - 8 Comments »
Be Sociable, Share!

DP/30: Hugo, actor Chloe Grace Moretz

Be Sociable, Share!

8 Comments »

8 Responses to “DP/30: Hugo, actor Chloe Grace Moretz”

  1. lazarus says:
    November 29, 2011 at 8:28 am

    This may be the one that finally sends Lex over the edge.

  2. lazarus says:
    November 29, 2011 at 8:29 am

    Also, I loved, loved, loved her in Hugo. Cute without being cloying, she helped sell the adventure/mystery aspect of the story but is also the emotional hook to carry the viewer until Mélies is revealed.

    Very nice work.

  3. film fanatic says:
    November 29, 2011 at 9:19 am

    You know that Dennis Quaid flick FREQUENCY? It’s important to remember that any “LOOK AT HER” comments this thread might receive today are actually being tweeted FROM THE FUTURE, where Ms. Moretz is already 18.

  4. David Poland says:
    November 29, 2011 at 10:28 am

    This thread will not being receiving any Lex love today. Must be his karma, but he got himself put on ban again very early this morning with a series of mental vomit comments.

  5. SamLowry says:
    November 29, 2011 at 11:25 am

    Ever since Kick-Ass? Maybe it’s a good thing that nobody’s associating Darcy with Hit-Girl (though it’d be nice to see her put Tigger in his place REAL fast).

  6. The Pope says:
    November 29, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    Listen to her. Just listen. Listen. To. Her.

  7. sanj says:
    November 30, 2011 at 1:09 am

    Trevor (brother) and Chloe Moretz Youtube Channel

    most videos are video blogs about movies Chloe is
    doing – usually 10 minutes or less

    http://www.youtube.com/user/theTduke

  8. LexG says:
    September 26, 2013 at 7:17 am

    LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER LOOK AT HER

    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOK

    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT

    HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEER

    MOST PERFECT WOMAN

    EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVER

The Hot Blog

Comments Most Recent Archives

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon