MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Mondo Goes To The Oscars

PRESS RELEASE: Mondo, the collectible art boutique of the Alamo Drafthouse, announces its first ever Academy Awards poster series, featuring limited edition prints of their favorite nominated films in select categories. There will be four posters from four different categories and the first two include:


HUGO (Best Picture category)
Artist: Kevin Tong
Size: 24×36
Edition: Regular (295), Variant (100)
Price: Regular ($45), Variant ($70)


RANGO (Best Animated Film category)
Artist: Tom Whalen
Size: 18×24
Edition: 270
Price: $40

The other two posters in the series will be revealed next week.

It was announced last year that Mondo has partnered with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences to archive all prints for their research library.

Posters for all four films will be sold during the Academy Awards on Sunday, February 26. Follow @MondoNews for the sale announce time.

Be Sociable, Share!

5 Responses to “Mondo Goes To The Oscars”

  1. leahnz says:

    i quite like the art deco design of the ‘hugo’ one sheet, but perhaps it’s the dyslexic in me that the backwards numbers make me go googly-eye — i can’t focus on any of the other imagery while my brain strains to flip the digits right way around, which of course defeats the purpose of the design and likely makes me an infinitesimal niche of viewers with such an issue.

    the simple ‘rango’ graphics are cool, but perhaps too many floating heads/torsos for my taste; i’m not fond of floating heads on movie posters

  2. waterbucket says:

    Maybe this will betray the flaming homo inside of me but when I saw the headline Mondo, I thought it was the designer from Project Runway.

  3. Hallick says:

    That Hugo poster is halfway to greatness, but there’s something pretty flat and unappealing about the Rango one-sheet since it’s 80% beige nothingness. A poster should represent the movie a lot better.

  4. anghus says:

    these are so uninspired. i love the idea of mondo but their output is painfully average. i see far more imaginative stuff on deviant art and concept art forums.

  5. KrazyEyes says:

    I bought their set of Sergio Leone spaghetti western posters about 5-6 years back and I still love them. The one’s I have are much better looking in real life as you can see a lot more of the subtlety in the screen printing.

    That said, I don’t really like the Rango one much either.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon