By Jake Howell jake.howell@utoronto.ca

Cannes Competition Review: Rust and Bone

It’s rather fitting that Jacques Audiard’s Rust and Bone debuted today in the south of France, given that a large majority of the film was shot in and around Cannes. If you’ve never been to the sunny seaside town that is home to decades of cinema history, you might want to check out Audiard’s latest, as all the Festival icons are here: the blue turrets of the Hotel Carlton; the monolith that is the Palais des Festivals; and of course, la mer.

Adapted from the Craig Davidson novel of the same name, Rust and Bone follows a budding romance between Ali and Stephanie, the latter being a trainer of killer whales and the victim of a tragic accident that leaves both her legs amputated. Thankfully, despite the plot summary of Rust and Bone sounding somewhat contrived, Audiard’s directorial competence ensures the final cut never feels artificial. Well, almost never: perhaps the only counterfeit aspect of the film is how the central romance begins, but when it does, Audiard treats his audience with the utmost respect and never forces emotion. Audiard’s contemporaries should be taking notes, as his films are master classes in exquisite pacing and exposition.

In terms of the performances, you won’t find a better French, thirtysomething actress nowadays than Marion Cotillard, whose role as Rust and Bone’s Stephanie will surely receive awards nominations from all the heavy hitters, and deservedly so. I imagine playing a sexually-frustrated double amputee isn’t the easiest script out there to agree to, but Cotillard’s faith in Audiard’s good hands is fortunate for everyone watching. She sells the role, which is likely her bravest yet.


Likewise, expect Matthias Schoenaerts’ career to be elevated from “that guy in Bullhead” to something far more complex. Schoenaerts’ Ali is your typical Audiard male; quiet and reserved, perhaps even sensitive — but on the inside, aggression and survival instincts roil. Ali’s financial situation requires him to take whatever he can get, which ends up being brutal street-fighting in the back alleys of Nice. In other words, Ali’s fists are his meal-ticket, but they also play a part in the crucial irony of the film’s closing scenes. I won’t say much more than that, but it’s very clear there is a direct connection between a man with powerful hands and the now leg-less Stephanie. To summarize, this is a modern, non-traditional love story about broken human beings that have the will to fix each other. At times it’s shocking, but at others it’s funny: for example, Ali’s idea of courtship is destined to be immortalized in online clips or passing references. A delicate balance of trauma and levity is carefully exhibited here; the result of which is nuanced and fulfilling.

Cinema math doesn’t always work out, as putting a group of talented people together on a film set doesn’t guarantee success. However, something about Rust and Bone felt extremely promising from the very beginning. And how could it not? With Jacques Audiard as director, Alexandre Desplat on music, and Marion Cotillard and Matthias Schoenaerts as the lead actors, Rust and Bone was built on a foundation of proven greatness. And as it turns out, the sum total is a winner.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon