By Jake Howell jake.howell@utoronto.ca

The Torontonian Reviews: The Silver Linings Playbook

The people have voted: David O. Russell’s The Silver Linings Playbook is the most popular film of TIFF 2012. Behind it is Ben Affleck’s Argo and Eran Riklis’ Zaytoun; taking second and third place, respectively. Written and directed by O. Russell, The Silver Linings Playbook is an above average romcom given a dash of seriousness with its discussion of mental illness and family fighting.

Recently released from a mental institution, Pat (Bradley Cooper) begins a quest to rekindle his marriage with Nikki, a woman who has since obtained a restraining order. After a brief set-up to show Pat’s father (Robert De Niro) is just as mentally ill as his son, Tiffany (Jennifer Lawrence) joins the fun to explain she has ties with Nikki, and is willing to act as Pat’s personal messenger service.

It’s soon revealed that Tiffany’s personality is just as tempestuous as Pat’s, and the pair forge a friendship as the Manic Pixie Dream Team. Soul-mates in denial, the two are like elevators; opening themselves to others before zooming up and down emotionally (though rarely plummeting to the basement sub-floors). The majority of the laughs occur whenever the script invokes their unstable bond, flirting via off-color dialogues and knee-jerk confessions.

Maybe I’m expecting more than I should from a romantic comedy, but there appears to have been a legitimate attempt by O. Russell to make Playbook something greater than your standard heart-warmer starring a shirtless Matthew McConaughey. Playbook is certainly “better” than that sort of film, but the stakes are low and the problems don’t feel urgent. In other words, Playbook wants to be a deeper film than it actually is: despite the film’s treatment of mental health and unrequited love, the narrative here is still somehow stunningly innocuous; at times even shallow. The illnesses these characters exhibit aren’t at all dangerous, and the few breaks in composure – the “snaps” that do go south – still have a blinding sheen of positivity and cutesiness that overrides any sense of emergency. The intriguing chaos of the film’s first half devolves to blandness, as Playbook’s emotional parabola never dips very far below the y-axis. O. Russell’s narrative simply doesn’t test the tensile strengths of the Hollywood safety nets.

The Silver Linings Playbook isn’t at all a bad film – it’s just by-the-numbers. Thankfully, there’s plenty of shiny gloss to help viewers overlook these flaws, as the production values are higher than most outings in the genre. To its credit, much of the film is entertaining and well-acted (Jennifer Lawrence in particular), and there’s even some excellent cinematography that zooms in and out with refreshing clarity. It also doesn’t hurt that Cooper and Lawrence are beautiful human beings. Unfortunately, there’s something holding this film back from being truly memorable, and it’s a shame that Playbook is only “pretty good”. Though initially quite promising, the film takes very few risks; eventually falling prey to expectations and perhaps laziness (the final reel goes off the rails with predictable conventions and silly genre tropes). The film will assuredly please crowds and win hearts in the end—perhaps even Oscar’s—but audiences interested in something more complex should probably look elsewhere.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon