By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Sundance favorite GOD LOVES UGANDA to receive theatrical release from Variance Films

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Academy Award winner Roger Ross Williams’ exposé of US Evangelical influence in Ugandan anti-homosexuality laws to hit theaters October 11, 2013.

 New York, August 29, 2013 – Variance Films announced today that Roger Ross Williams’ GOD LOVES UGANDA will be released theatrically beginning in New York City on October 11, 2013, followed by an expansion to theaters across the US and Canada throughout the fall and into early 2014.

With GOD LOVES UGANDA, Academy Award winning filmmaker Roger Ross Williams (Music by Prudence) explores the role of the American Evangelical movement in fueling Uganda’s terrifying turn towards biblical law and the proposed death penalty for homosexuality.  Thanks to charismatic religious leaders and a well-financed campaign, these draconian new laws and the politicians that peddle them are winning over the Ugandan public.  But these dangerous policies and the money that fuels them aren’t coming from Africa; they’re being imported from some of America’s largest megachurches.  Using vérité, interviews, and hidden camera footage, the film allows American religious leaders and their young missionaries that make up the “front lines in a battle for billions of souls” to explain their positions in their own words.

“It’s been a three year journey, and I am beyond excited to be teaming with Variance Films to bring GOD LOVES UGANDA to the big screen,” said director Roger Ross Williams.

“We are thrilled to partner with Variance Films so that GOD LOVES UGANDA can reach audiences across North America,” said producer Julie Goldman of Motto Pictures.  “Since its Sundance Film Festival premiere, GOD LOVES UGANDA has screened at festivals and events around the world and the response has been extraordinary. Audiences are moved by the storytelling and outraged at what the film exposes. We look forward to the theatrical release to spark a dialogue around these important and timely issues.”

“Even as our LGBTI brothers and sisters rack up hard-fought victories here at home, something scary is happening overseas.  I believe there is a direct connection between the far-right elements of the religious community in America and the passage of dangerous anti-gay legislation in places like Uganda and Russia… and I believe Roger’s film expertly connects the dots between the two,” said Dylan Marchetti, president and founder of Variance Films.  “I think this is one of the most important films we’ve ever released, and my hope is that GOD LOVES UGANDA will not only inspire discussion in the theater lobby, but lead to direct action when people get home.”

GOD LOVES UGANDA was directed by Roger Ross Williams, and produced by Williams and Julie Goldman.  The film is a co-production of Full Credit Productions, Motto Pictures, and the Independent Television Service (ITVS).

OFFICIAL SITE/SOCIAL MEDIA:  godlovesuganda.com / @GodLovesUganda / facebook.com/godlovesuganda

ABOUT VARIANCE FILMS

Founded in 2008, Variance partners with leading independent filmmakers to distribute the most exciting independent films to theaters across the US and Canada, using innovative release strategies that focus on collaborative, grassroots marketing tactics to drive audiences to theaters.   Recent and upcoming releases include Dave Grohl’s SOUND CITY, Spike Lee’s RED HOOK SUMMER, John Sayles’ GO FOR SISTERS and AMIGO, Cullen Hoback’s TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY APPLY, Johnnie To’s DRUG WAR, Terence Nance’s AN OVERSIMPLIFICATION OF HER BEAUTY, and Wilson Yip’s IP MAN 2: LEGEND OF THE GRANDMASTER.  For more information, please visit variancefilms.com  / facebook.com/variancefilms

 

ABOUT MOTTO PICTURES

Founded in 2009, Motto Pictures produces and executive produces feature documentary films.  From development to completion, Motto focuses on every creative aspect of producing. Motto secures financing, develops innovative distribution strategies, and positions the film in domestic and international markets to reach the widest audience, garner strong publicity and maximize its full sales potential.  Recent productions include: GOD LOVES UGANDA, THE KILL TEAM, GIDEON’S ARMY, MANHUNT, BEWARE OF MR BAKER, A PLACE AT THE TABLE, AI WEIWEI: NEVER SORRY, and BUCK. mottopictures.com  / facebook.com/mottopictures

 

###

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon