MCN Blogs

By DP30

DP/30 @ TIFF ’13: Night Moves, actor Dakota Fanning

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to “DP/30 @ TIFF ’13: Night Moves, actor Dakota Fanning”

  1. Mel_M says:


    This is absolutely and by leaps & bounds, the best Dakota interview I’ve ever seen. She’s a fine actress and it’s always been kinda frustrating that we’ve heard so little about the professional Dakota from Dakota herself. Her Uptown Girls director said that she approached her role strictly from the point of view of the character, so it’s clear that something extraordinary had to be going on in that 8yo head.

    I too think the underrated Hounddog was a line. IMO, it was an abrupt end to her child movies and proved that she could be a solid dramatic actress. Her extraordinary performance as Lewellen never ceases to amaze me, and I’m still upset that she didn’t get any award nominations for it. Of course, I would have loved to have been there when the not yet 13yo Dakota had to angrily explain that “…none of the kids went through anything. It’s called acting!” Priceless! I realized even then that Dakota understood the movie and knew what she was doing; I had the greatest respect for her because of that.

    My list of super performances by actresses includes Jodie Foster in The Accused, Charlize Theron in Monster, and Natalie Portman in Black Swan. It’s the psychological detail and subtlety in each of these performances that make them stand out. Roles with this potential don’t come around every day, but I’m hoping Dakota will get her shot one of these years.

    Great interview; hope you can catch up with her again someday.

  2. LexG says:


  3. LexG says:


    AT HER

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon