By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Ira Deutchman Donates Personal Archive On Indie Film To U Mich

(press release) The University of Michigan Library will welcome the papers of another maverick to their growing collection of material that highlights visionaries in the genre of independent film.

Ira Deutchman announced Dec. 2 at the Lincoln Center in New York that he will donate his entire archive to U-M’s Screen Arts Mavericks & Makers collection.

Deutchman will be in good company—the popular U-M collection comprises the papers of indie greats including Orson Welles, Robert Altman, Alan Rudolph and John Sayles.

“We believe U-M is becoming the go-to place for housing independent filmmaking materials because of our dedication to providing hands-on learning opportunities with these materials to students and scholars,” said James Hilton, U-M dean of libraries.

“The addition of Ira’s papers complements our current mavericks collection in a tremendous way—he has worked with Robert Altman, John Sayles and Alan Rudolph on many projects.”

With a prolific career spanning 40 years, Deutchman has been making, marketing and distributing films since 1975. He has worked on more than 150 films—including “Matewan,” “The Player,” “Short Cuts,” “Stop Making Sense,” “sex, lies & videotape” and “Hoop Dreams”—some of the most successful independent films of all time.

He was one of the founders of Cinecom and later created Fine Line Features—two companies that were created from scratch, and in their respective times, helped to define the independent film business.

Deutchman’s personal documents and emails, photographs, ephemera from art house exhibits, collection of film festival catalogues and posters from films he represented will reveal an inside look at the business of independent film from the mid-1970s to the present.

Daniel Herbert, U-M associate professor of screen arts and cultures, who has invited Deutchman into his “New Line and New Hollywood Cinema” class as a guest lecturer many times over the last few years, says the collection will be “immediately impactful.”

“Ira has had enormous influence on the shape of independent cinema in various capacities, and he has a real eye for quality,” Herbert said. “This collection will demonstrate that film directors are not the only creatives in the film industry and that one can also be a visionary in the business sense.”

Deutchman is a professor of professional practice at Columbia University School of the Arts, and continues to work as an independent producer and consultant in marketing and distribution of independent films. Among his clients is Emerging Pictures, a New York-based company that he co-founded in 2002 that specializes in independent film, documentaries and foreign language films, as well as live broadcasts of cultural programming, such as opera, ballet and Shakespeare plays.

“I’m truly honored to be considered side-by-side with some of the most important independent filmmakers in history, and that my archives will be part of the University of Michigan’s Screen Arts Mavericks & Makers Collection,” Deutchman said.

“I believe that it is important to understand the role of marketers, distributors, exhibitors and curators in the support and creation of film culture in the U.S. Without that part of the independent film ecosystem, it’s hard to imagine how these maverick filmmakers could have survived. By bringing this part of the discussion to their collection, the University of Michigan is making a huge contribution to the study of independent cinema.”

Ira Deutchman will be the focus of the June 2017 Mavericks & Makers symposium and exhibition that will be presented in partnership with the Cinetopia International Film Festival in Detroit and Ann Arbor, and with Columbia University in New York, where Deutchman has taught film studies for the last 29 years.

“As professor of film at the School of the Arts, and during his tenure as chair, Ira has shared his vast experience with students in immeasurable ways,” said Carol Becker, dean of faculty at the school. “We are so proud that the record of his distinguished career is being recognized in this way.”

The museum-quality exhibitions and special programs created for the Mavericks & Makers symposium will also be toured nationally to select specialty cinemas in North America. Cinemas hosting this tour are members of Art House Convergence, a national organization of independent community-based, mission-driven cinemas.

The upcoming 2016 Makers & Mavericks symposium will feature Alan Rudolph June 6-8 in conjunction with the Cinetopia International Film Festival June 3-12.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon