By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Cinema Eye Honors Announces 2017 Shorts List

 

 

CINEMA EYE ANNOUNCES 2017 “SHORTS LIST”

10 Semi-Finalists for Outstanding Nonfiction Short Film Honor

All ten films to screen this weekend at Camden International Film Festival

New York, NY  – Cinema Eye, the largest annual celebration for, and recognition of, the nonfiction film artform and creators, today announced 10 nonfiction short films as semi-finalists for the 2017 Cinema Eye Honor for Nonfiction Short Film.

The announcement of the annual Cinema Eye “Shorts List” was made on the eve of the 2016 Camden International Film Festival (CIFF), a key festival partner and sponsor of the Cinema Eye Honors. For the third year in a row, all 10 films, which are among the most acclaimed short documentaries of the year, will screen this weekend at CIFF on the coast of Maine. 

“In the past few years, the short form has been one of documentary’s most exciting modes to engage subjects and stories,” said Rachel Rosen, Director of Programming for the San Francisco Film Society and the Chair of the Cinema Eye Shorts Committee. “This year is no exception as these 10 excellent films take us to unexpected places and introduce us to characters we’ve never seen before.”

From the ten semi-finalists on this year’s Shorts List, five films will be named as nominees for Outstanding Achievement in Nonfiction Short. Nominees in that category and nearly a dozen feature film categories will be announced on Wednesday, November 2 in New York City. The winner will be announced at the 10th Annual Cinema Eye Honors Ceremony at the Museum of the Moving Image in Astoria, Queens on January 11, 2017.

This year’s ten finalists are:

Bacon and God’s Wrath (Canada)

Directed by Sol Friedman

The Black Belt (USA)

Directed by Margaret Brown

Extremis (USA)

Directed by Dan Krauss

Gatekeeper (Canada)

Directed by Yung Chang

La Laguna (Mexico)

Directed by Aaron Schock

My Aleppo (USA)

Direct by Melissa Langer

Pickle (USA)

Directed by Amy Nicholson

The Send-Off (USA)

Directed by Ivette Lucas and Patrick Bresnan

Peace in the Valley (USA)

Directed by Mike Palmieri and Donal Mosher

Uzu (Japan)

Directed by Gaspard Kuentz

Yung Chang and Michael Palmieri & Donal Mosher are previous Cinema Eye Honorees, having been awarded the Best Debut Feature Honor for Up the Yangtze (CEH 2009) and October Country (2010), respectively.  Margaret Brown was previously nominated for three Cinema Eye Honors in 2009, including Outstanding Feature and Direction, for The Order of Myths.  Aaron Schock directed the featureCirco, which was nominated for Outstanding Score (CEH 2011).

Finalists for the Short Filmmaking award were determined in voting by top short film/documentary programmers from international film festivals.  Members of this year’s Short Film Nominations Committee included: Chair Rachel Rosen (San Francisco), Claire Aguilar (Sheffield), Chris Boeckman (True/False), Cara Cusumano (Tribeca), Ben Fowlie (Camden), Claudette Godfrey (SXSW), Doug Jones (Images Cinema), Ted Mott (Full Frame), Veton Nurkollari (Dokufest Kosovo), Dan Nuxoll (Rooftop), Mike Plante (Sundance), and Kim Yutani (Sundance).

This is the seventh year that Cinema Eye has presented an award for Nonfiction Short Filmmaking.  Previous winners in the category include The Poodle Trainer (directed by Vance Malone, 2011), Diary (Tim Hetherington, 2012), Goodbye Mandima (Kwa Heri Mandima) (Robert-Jan Lacombe, 2013), A Story for the Modlins (Sergio Oksman, 2014), The Lion’s Mouth Opens (Lucy Walker, 2015), and Buffalo Juggalos (Scott Cummings, 2016) & Hotel 22 (Elizabeth Lo, 2016) .

This marks the fifth year that the CEH Shorts List has been announced in connection with the Camden International Film Festival. This January will mark the eighth consecutive year that CIFF will host their annual Nominees Party on the eve of the Cinema Eye Honors Ceremony.  The Nominees Party is a key part of Cinema Eye Week, a multi-day event that includes screenings, filmmaker training, a super secret field trip and multiple celebrations that bring together the international documentary community.

This year’s Cinema Eye Week will be held January 6-11, 2017.

For more information about Cinema Eye Honors, visit http://www.cinemaeyehonors.com/.  Cinema Eye on Twitter: @cinemaeyehonors.

 

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon