MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride

“Twin Peaks”: A Place For Spoilers

Falling into a dream: the main credits of the new series.

Be Sociable, Share!

5 Responses to ““Twin Peaks”: A Place For Spoilers”

  1. Sideshow Bill says:

    I loved it. Was a fan of the show since day one –my college years– and it was thrilling seeing Lynch go completely untethered for 2 hours. It picks up in a logical place, establishes some plot and indulges in the weirdness. I liked the expansion of the universe outside of Twin Peaks a lot.

    The 3 and 4th episodes were a slight let down despite some brilliant, ERASERHEAD-y stretches, and great work by MacLachlan. I hope they can keep this pace up for 14 more episodes. If so it’ll be something to behold, especially if Lynch truly is done with feature filmmaking.

  2. Ray Pride says:

    One way of looking at it: David Lynch is releasing the equivalent of NINE feature films over the course of less than five months.

  3. Sideshow Bill says:

    Very true. The first 2 hours felt like a whole.

    Michael Cera was a stitch in episode 4. And seeing Duchovny again was great. And Robert Forster is pure class every time. I hope he takes on a bigger role. Great choice for that role.

  4. Glamourboy says:

    Was really reminded of how much Lynch brutalizes women…for not understandable reason. And women in his work often are attacked, brutalized or killed when they are wearing very little clothing. How can this possibly be acceptable to a 2017 audience?

  5. PTA Fluffer says:

    Glamourboy, does Lynch brutalize women? Or is he an artist responding to a world in which women are brutalized?

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon