MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Friday Estimates by Happy Klady Day

Friday Estimates 2017-10-14 at 9.55.34 AM

Happy Death Day will open better than any film did last October (as BR49 did) and marks the third Blumhouse original to open well in 2017. It’s the best horror opening in October since 2014’s Annabelle (via Team Wan). Their only sequel is an Amityville at Dimension… we’ll see what the opening there looks like.

It’s worth pointing out that Universal has had a relatively low-key, but kick-ass 2017. The only loser was The Mummy, which did just over $400 million worldwide, making it a huge disappointment, stalling the Universal Monsters effort indefinitely, but still not losing a lot of money for the studio. The three Blumhouse pictures have performed better than anyone could have imagined. The two franchise movies, FF and Despicable, each passed $1 billion worldwide. And the “middle movies,” like Girl Trip, Fifty Shades Darker and A Dog’s Life were all money makers. The only other mark on the studio’s year was the release of The Great Wall, which was for all intents and purposes an output deal.

The Foreigner will be Jackie Chan’s best domestic opening on-camera since 2010’s The Karate Kid. It also has a good chance of being STX’s #3 all-time launch, though the company expects to beat this number twice as this year goes on, with Bad Moms 2 and Molly’s Game. Some might say I am looking at the glass half full, bit I would say the glass here is three-quarters full and people shouldn’t obsess on the empty quarter.

Marshall didn’t find a lot of takers,  heading to around $3,500 per screen for the weekend on 821 screens. Movies about history may be a bigger challenge than anyone expects in the exhausting Trump era, with endless fresh meat thrown into the news cycle.

Even weaker was the launch of Professor Marston and the Wonder Women, a title that can only be described as uninspiring. Bad titles are becoming an Annapurna distribution thing. I haven’t seen the movie. Would have. Fan of the director. Never happened. Nor did the interview that was pitched to me with the director. (Shrug) No idea what they were thinking with this date. Really odd screen count for a non-specialty movie. Feels like a dump, but would Annapurna be dumping its second release as a distributor? (shrug)

The 140-minute Ai Weiwei doc, Human Flow, was Friday’s box office winner in exclusive release, on three screens. Heading to $15k per for the weekend. Great, powerful movie. Just heart and truth and humanity.

Blade Runner 2049 didn’t fall off a cliff… but didn’t hang on the edge like it’s going pull itself back up, either.

Kingsman: The Golden Circle slowed faster after opening than expected. While I found Eggsy’s relationship charming, the lack of a love story probably hurt audience reaction. And the loss of Channing Tatum from the co-star level slot made the movie more complicated, and the lack of Tatum’s goofy charm was evident. Still, $300 million worldwide probably makes a threequel, with Tatum, inevitable.

American Made is another Tom Cruise movie that audiences seem to like more than they liked the ad campaign (aka opening day).

Be Sociable, Share!

12 Responses to “Friday Estimates by Happy Klady Day”

  1. That Guy says:

    “Still, $300 million worldwide probably makes the threequel, with Tatum, inevitable.”

    God that’s depressing. The Golden Circle was dire, a giant mess. It played like Vaughn was pitching ideas right and left regardless of whether they made any sense, and Jane Goldman had to pull them together somehow.

  2. EtGuild2 says:

    IT continues to hold brilliantly, climbing WB’s all time domestic chart as it’ll pass POTTER 1 this week, SUICIDE SQUAD in a couple weeks and will likely catch BvS. Worldwide, it’s into 8th place on the year with no China, and Italy and Japan still to come. I know DP hates this, but at $650 million worldwide it’ll almost certainly end up as the 4th most profitable movie of the year (pure box office only).

  3. Poet4 says:

    Odd bunch of releases.
    “Marshall” definitely picked the wrong week for a story about a false rape accusation and trial.
    And “Marston”? Why…because Wonder Woman was a hit? Does this mean we can look forward to a Stephen King biopic in a few months?

  4. Michael Bergeron says:

    “Marston” was in development in one way or another for eight years so the release in tandem with WW is more coincidence than purposely

  5. Warren says:

    The success of WW probably fooled them into attempting this weird semi-wide release instead of platforming it, though.

  6. Movieman says:

    Wanted to like “Marston” more than I did. (Especially after having to drive 90 minutes round-trip to see it.)
    The true-life story is juicy; the movie itself felt strangely arid, though.
    Not bad, but definitely no “Kinsey” or “Masters of Sex.”

    Very surprising that “Marshall” didn’t get as wide a release as, say, “Race.”

    And it seems odd that Focus isn’t expanding “V&A” as (relatively) quickly and widely as “Zookeeper’s Wife” this spring. I know some seniors who really want to see it.

    Goodbye “Goodbye Christopher Robin.” We hardly knew ye.
    Another Searchlight awards hopeful bites the dust.

    P.S.= Is that “American Satan” # accurate? If so, hmmm.

  7. Christian says:

    With two MUBI releases on the “Also Debuting” chart, I’m just waking up to the fact that the streaming service is in the distribution game. I don’t know how I missed its entry into that portion of the business, but they’ve been at it since last year: http://www.indiewire.com/2016/10/streaming-platform-mubi-theatrical-marketplace-1201740633/

  8. Bender says:

    Not sure what kind of opening your expecting for Blum’s Amityville sequel as its available to watch for free on Googleplay.

    Just saw The Foreigner. I was blown away. I thought it was excellent. It kept me enthralled throughout. Jackie Chan and Pierce Brosnan quite impressive.
    The theatre had moved it from a medium screen to its largest…bumping BR2049 from its perch in Auditorium #1. The auditorium was about half full, a good crowd for a matinee.

  9. Bender says:

    That American Satan gross has to be a mistake.

  10. YancySkancy says:

    The trailers I’ve seen for MARSHALL seem to be selling it partially as an action movie in which Thurgood kicks ass and takes names, complete with rap on the soundtrack.

  11. Poet says:

    That American Satan distributor must be a mistake.

  12. hcat says:

    Maybe it was just sky high expectations for Mummy, but I think its odd that Edge of Tomorrow was seen as a draw/slight win despite costing 50 million more and grossing less WW while Mummy is seen as a stinker while being profitable. Quality of final product might play into that but I can still see them going forward with Bride and just keeping Crowe and letting Cruise go with time served. Isnt it the Mummy the need for the crossovers to occur?

    And was looking at BOMOJO and found it funny that for all the times Cruise has been able to get a film over 100 domestic (I think he is second only to Hanks) he has never been able to get a Universal title over the line.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon