By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

City of Los Angeles Officially June 16 Buster Keaton Day

Posted Wednesday, May 23rd, 2018 - Comments Off on City of Los Angeles Officially June 16 Buster Keaton Day
Be Sociable, Share!

Events include dedication of plaque commemorating Buster Keaton, Charlie Chaplin Studio, plus location tours and screenings

Los Angeles (May 23, 2018)—A bronze plaque commemorating the location of a movie studio where both Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin created their timeless comedies in the early part of the 20th century will be dedicated at 4 p.m. June 16, 2018, at 1021 Lillian Ave., near the intersection of Eleanor Avenue and Lillian Way in Los Angeles. 30 years ago, a plaque was inadvertently placed on an incorrect corner, and now the International Buster Keaton society is remedying this (appropriately farcical) injustice. The city of Los Angeles will declare that day “Buster Keaton Day” in honor of the influential comedian and filmmaker.

The plaque dedication will be open to the public. Currently scheduled guests include Los Angeles Councilmember Mitch O’Farrell, film historian Leonard Maltin (who was present at the installation of the original plaque), and members of Buster Keaton’s family, including his granddaughter, Melissa Talmadge Cox, and his great-granddaughter, actress Keaton Talmadge.
The original plaque was dedicated on July 6, 1988, on the corner of Eleanor and Way in Hollywood. In a moment of Keatonesque absurdity, it was placed across the street from the actual location of the studio, and overlooked the fact that Chaplin had also used that studio.
The funding of the new plaque, as well as a smaller plaque explaining the mix-up, came from $18,107 donated by contributors to an international Indiegogo campaign. The remaining costs were covered by the International Buster Keaton Society Inc., the nonprofit group sponsoring both the plaque and its dedication.
The dedication will be part of a full weekend of Buster Keaton events organized by the International Buster Keaton Society Inc. The events begin with a gala at the Hollywood Heritage Museum, and include screenings of Keaton films at the Egyptian Theatre, visits to Keaton and Talmadge grave sites (at Forest Lawn Memorial Park-Hollywood Hills and Hollywood Forever Cemetery respectively), plus tours of Keaton, Chaplin and Harold Lloyd filming locations to be conducted by John Bengtson, author of ​Silent Echoes: Discovering Early Hollywood Through the Films of Buster Keaton. The weekend ends with “Shut Up!” An Afternoon of Keaton-Inspired Comedy at UCB Inner Sanctum.
Considered to be one the greatest comedians and filmmakers of all time, Buster Keaton made 19 silent short films and 10 silent features between 1920 and 1928, using this production studio for nearly all of them. Prior to Keaton’s tenure, Charlie Chaplin used the same studio between 1916 and 1917 to produce 12 of his greatest short films.
Keaton is considered not only one of America’s greatest comedians but one of the world’s greatest movie directors as well. Six of his films have been included in the National Film Registry, making him one of the most honored filmmakers on that prestigious list: One Week (1920), Cops (1922), Sherlock Jr. (1924), The General (1926), Steamboat Bill, Jr., and The Cameraman (both 1928). Time magazine proclaimed Sherlock Jr. one of its top 100 movies of all time.
Keaton and his films have placed on several of the American Film Institute’s lists. He is #21 on the AFI’s list of the 50 greatest American screen legends, and his 1926 masterpiece The General is #18 on the AFI’s “100 Years…100 Movies — 10th Anniversary Edition” and #18 again on its “100 Years… 100 Laughs” list, with Sherlock Jr. placing #62 and The Navigator #81 on that same list. Entertainment Weekly named Keaton #35 on its list of “100 Greatest Movie Stars of All Time.”
Sight & Sound magazine ranked The General as #34 on its 2012 list of the greatest films of all time, and as #75 on its list of the greatest directors of all time. Keaton and The General also made the 1972 and 1982 Sight & Sound top 10 lists, which are announced once every 10 years.
During his lifetime, Keaton was a recipient of the George Eastman Award in its year of inception (1955), and he received an Honorary Academy Award® in 1960 “for his unique talents which brought immortal comedies to the screen.” In addition, Keaton has two stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, one for his movies (6619 Hollywood Blvd.) and the other for his television work (6321 Hollywood Blvd.).
The International Buster Keaton Society Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, was established in 1992 with the purpose of fostering understanding and perpetuating appreciation of the life, career and films of Buster Keaton. The group advocates for historical accuracy about Keaton’s life and work, encourages dissemination of information and research about Keaton, and endorses preservation and restoration of Keaton’s films and performances.
Be Sociable, Share!

Posted in MCN Curated Headlines, Movie City News, Press Releases | Comments Off on City of Los Angeles Officially June 16 Buster Keaton Day

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon