MCN Columnists
David Poland

20 Weeks to Oscar By David Polandpoland@moviecitynews.com

Week Ten – 67 Days to Go The Great Settling ’06

Yes, ladies & gentlemen, it’s that time again…. The Great Settling of 2006 has begun. We got past the last gasp of hypersensitivity with the on-again/off-again DGA screener battle. Hair was pulled, egos were floated, millions of dollars were at stake… and in the end, same old same old. And now, as the week leads…

Read the full article »

Week Nine – 74 Days to Go – The Night Before The Globes Noms

The Search For Meaning The Golden Globe Nominations mean nothing. Nothing. Okay… well not nothing. But pretty close to nothing. People, professionally prognosticating and not, seem to be anxiously searching out answers at this time of year and particularly this year, when the season was pretty well defined before Thanksgiving. Change. We need change. Please,…

Read the full article »

Best Picture Chart

BEST PICTURE Picture – Studio Golden Globes Comment Dreamgirls C/M Clearly the likely leader in nominations… it’s spirit and show biz story should make it the easy winner Letters From Iwo Jima FL Significantly better than Flags, which will make it the perceived #2… but a languid 2:20 running time and Japanese language makes it…

Read the full article »

Week Eight – 81 Days to Go Inside Out

“I wish Oscar season could be 50 weeks a year!” I won’t name the person who actually said that out loud this week, but I wanted to drop to my knees and pray for him not to get his wish as soon as I heard it. But this person has made a very successful career…

Read the full article »

20 Weeks to Oscar

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon