The Hot Blog Archive for April, 2007

It's Not Just The Weinstein's Problem

Would it be a failure of the Weinsteins became another Imagine or, for arguments sake, year 2003 Miramax? I don’t think so. Building a distribution machine is very expensive and very difficult. It has become an institutional business. Anyone with the money and access to talented people can make a movie. But wide release distribution is not something you just walk into … even if you can luck into a success or two.
The rest…

1 Comment »

Friday Estimates by Klady

That’s a really nice number for Disturbia. Gerry Rich and the Paramount team figured out how to a Screen Gems opening for what is basically, a Screen Gems movie. And that is not damning with faint praise.
The Ashley Judd genre is officially dead, as Halle Berry puts up her worst opening since Monster’s Ball.
Pathfinder dies the death it has been foretelling for a year now.
Redline does fairly well for an truly independently distributed movie… certainly compared to Pathfinder.
And all the talk about Grindhouse grinds it up even futher. It’s a good thing that the New York Times is there to sweep the mess under the rug for The Weinsteins.
The truth is, it is very similar to what happened to DreamWorks. TWC entered the marketplace at the worst possible time to build their dream and they have been caught with their financial pants around their ankles. And the NYT suckage and the arrival of Michael Moore with a $50 million grosser and even adding a west coast gossip to their east coast bee-otch, Mr. Friedman, ain’t going to change the inevitable shift of the next 6 months.
bo0414a.jpg
EDIT – Pulled “The family audience continues to show its muscles as Are We Done Yet? holds all too well. ” because the typo in the chart became apparent. Also, chart replaced with the correction of AWTY? to 55% off.

42 Comments »

THE TOP 20ish (Pt 2)

As you will see, there are more than 20 people in this Top 20. And here is why

24 Comments »

MPAA Muscle

The MPAA forced The Weinstein Co to pull their Rob Zombie Halloween trailer off the web, including Yahoo! Movies because it was too violent. The trailer is currently attached to Grindhouse.
This is the third, I believe, “Yellow Tag” trailer under new MPAA rules. This allows the trailer to play on the web late at night only.
Crazy or a clever idea?
Or is this just another Weinstein Co distraction from Grindhouse talk? After all, The New York Times was willing to serve up the Kool-Aid… why not everyone else?

10 Comments »

"Ideas Or The Lack Of Them Can Cause Disease"

For me, Kurt Vonnegut was one of the most cinematic of all novelists. Ironically, none of his books have ever successfully been transferred into cinema.
The closest to getting it was probably Keith Gordon

13 Comments »

3rd Annual THB Biggest Stars Survey – Pt 1

STILL SUSPECT
Jennifer Aniston has been in some big successes, but always with a power guy by her side, whether Vince Vaughn or Ben Stiller or Jim Carrey or even Kevin Costner, who is still pretty effective drawing women to movies. But without the support?
Gerard Butler has a major cult following and 300 is a huge hit ,,, but there is little to suggest it has much to do with Mr. Butler in a specific way.
Jake Gyllenhaal – Gyllenhaal has an interesting thing about always being considered on the edge of “;happening,”; yet he makes movie after movie that is bigger than his role in the film. Can any financier really credit him with the box office success of Brokeback Mountain or the openings of Zodiac, Jarhead or The Day After Tomorrow? And he hasn’t had any of his films gross more than $15 million aside from his career starter, October Sky in 1999.
Jon Heder – Is it him or is it his co-stars? I love his work, but his box office value is still a giant question mark.
Samuel L. Jackson – It’s hard not to love and/or respect him, but since 2003’s SWAT (and ensemble film), Snakes on a Plane is his second biggest hit after Coach Carter. Great performances, but a box office cipher.
Shia LaBeouf – The star of Transformers has been in some hits ,,, but is anyone paying to see him?
Eva Mendes – She has become The Girl of choice in town lately, along with Ms. Biel. And films with Nic Cage, Will Smith, Matt Damon, and Denzel Washington have all done a bit better than expected with her along for the ride. But can she draw ticket buyers?
Hilary Swank – She has actually had a decent run since the second Oscar. But she’s only been the lead twice and neither film will crack $40 million domestic, so…

More…

55 Comments »

An Entry About Me

The Hairspray entry has digressed into a discussion about me…
My fault. I bit.
So let’s take it out of that entry and over here if this requires more discussion.

59 Comments »

The Blog Some Days

5 Comments »

How Much Is Enough & Who Can Get It?

“Where is the best place to take my movie?” is a question that hasn’t quite settled into the mindset of the higher priced indie world yet. Yes, as always, anything can happen. But if your aspiration for a movie is to gross over $30 million domestic, getting a major studio release is critical. Of course, with that bigger machine, they handing marketing and publicity on a bigger level and really don’t know how to aim lower. So your costs increase as well. And for independent producers, there is the bigger mind fuck of knowing that a studio relationship means a windfall opportunity is much more distant than if magic happens independently. So which is it? Which of Sophie’s kids goes away with the Nazis?
The rest…

A Small Scoop Of The Summer Sorbet

Almost no one thought it was going to happen. The gaypevine was abuzz with negativity from pre-production through the first months of production. Jim Broadbent took off right before production. What was Travolta doing? The first leaked photos were scary. The December web presence was all Latifah and no Queen John.
And then, they put the movie together. And before even seeing tonight

51 Comments »

Quotes of the Day

A rather insane read on the future of media from Emily Gould, the current editor of Gawker.com, who went on Larry King Live when Jimmy Kimmel was hosting. Kimmel has some personal issues with Gawker, but Gould reminded us dramatically why

4 Comments »

Question Of The Day – The Hard R?

Just ran into this online when checking out some nasty YouTube comment about what an idiot I am for not loving Grindhouse like my first born.
The issue of Grindhouse and the MPAA is already dated. But I’d be interested in your notions of whether a Hard R or any more restrictive rating than an R from the MPAA wil ever work?
And does MPAA “censorship” change your perception of a movie before you see it?

12 Comments »

Indie Theater Plays Grindhouse 8 Blocks From The Clinton

This is how one ends up going down the toilet.
I didn

8 Comments »

The End Of Longform E-Journalism?

With due respect to Anne Thompson and Premiere Magazine, the reason Premiere died (walking dead for years now) is that it didn’t do longform journalism. Instead of becoming America’s great journal on film, it became a slightly longer lead, somewhat more glossy EW, selling set visits as news.
There was a great moment, back when John Horn was actually breaking news in a monthly, where Premiere mattered. But with due respect to many fine journalists who worked there to the end, that time is a distant memory. What was great, however, was that people like Kim Masters, who are not built to work at web speed (which she proved at both Inside.com and now at Slate) had a place to work at a slower piece and to do richer work as a result.
That said, there is no reason why that cannot be something done on the web. The first company that turns that corner will have a surprising winner. The problem is monetizing it.
More importantly, I would argue that there is more good work written on film these days than EVER before. We are in a renaissance. We also have a lot of shit flying around. And as in all renaissances, the whores get more attention. But even the diaper dandies of ReverseShot are adding to the conversation in a valuable way, even if they too often lose their way and try to make points be pissing on the adult’s table. I am glad they are there. Some will mature and be very important. Others will end up selling time shares. But the mere existance of the blog is a big step.
Manohla Dargis is really the figure head for the expansion of thoughtful movie conversation. A lifelong alt queen, her ascension at the LA Times and now NY Times was driven, in my view, not just by her skill, but by the excitement she engenders in readers, love her ideas or hate them. As a result of her ideas, a different kind of thinking has now joined the mainstream. And Tony Scott, who brings a different sensibility, is better for the intellectual balance across the ink stained aisle.
The many long-standing writers who are being unceremoniously dumped by Traditional Media stil have a place on the web, often reaching more people than ever. Whether you want ALL of Roger Ebert or more form Dave Kehr or to read Amy Taubin or to follow Reid Rosenfelt or even to indulge in a big gulp of Jon Rosenbaum, you can. If you want celebrity gossip, it’s around. If you want industry gossip, it’s around. If you want some serous discussions of money or marketing or mise-en-sc

3 Comments »

Question Of The Week

Once we get rolling on this, feel free to go wild commenting on other people’s idea. But I think it would be a great exercise for all of us to offer, “What went wrong with Grindhouse?” in 25 words or less.
If you have more than one theory, number them up and give us multiples, 25 or less.
I’ll start – Grindhouse did exactly as much as it was meant to do. It was 3 hours long. It acknowledged being intentionally bad. Sold!

147 Comments »

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon