The Hot Blog Archive for September, 2007

Ya Know…

Does it tell you anything that even Denise Brown is sick of obsessing on OJ?
The Simpson Case: Episode Two – Crazy Vegas Memorabilia Shite is a sequel I would really rather no watch. It

21 Comments »

Paramount Pays $600m For 3 Yrs Of DreamWorks, But Can DW Find A Billion To Put Par In The Rear View?

A rather stunning 38 minute conversation with Viacom Philippe Dauman, Viacom, Inc. President & CEO, chatting at the Goldman Sachs 2007 Communacopia Conference. You would wonder, through most of the chat, whether Viacom will still be in the business of owning a full service movie studio in the years to come. The focus was almost completely on the ongoing efforts around the company

6 Comments »

When Does Sony Go This Way?

MGM announced today that they would have their very own HD channel on DirecTV this fall, following in the footsteps of Universal, whose Universal HD channel combines movies and TV shows from the studio catalog with some NBC sports programming, all in HD, supported by ad sales. The studio already has the ad-supported Sleuth channel, which is loaded with the studio’s decades old catalog of cop shows and thrillers.
Disney, Fox, and Paramount already have a load of channels in the cable space, branded in various ways, though aside from FX, which uses the Fox catalog a but like used goods in combination with new shows, and Disney, which is kid branded, the studios are not the brands.
As the only major with no network, cable or broadcast, Sony needs to start heading in this direction sooner than later. Television is the next step for internal use of libraries, which are losing value due daily to limited distribution options on cable and a DVD glut. And really, so people who like Wheel of Fortune worry that they might be watching an hour of 20 year old episodes each day… or does that excite them even more?
Also – I must admit that my “giant DVR” comments in the past have been bouyed farther by my own experience of the last couple of days. On returning to L.A. and my new-ish HD DVR, which has a frustratingly small amount of space for programs in HD, it took all of a $200 external hard drive and a wire from the back of the DirecTV DVR to make over 100 hours of space available for my use. And if I had spent a couple hundred more, it could just as easily have been 200 hours. And the drive? It’s the size of a quality paperback and makes no drive noise at all.
I know that most people are too intimidated to even figure out what an eSata cord it. But the outlet was on my DVR for a reason. The future is coming. And when I can watch The Bourne Ultimatum at home in HD in November (or whenever 3 months after release is) for an extra $10 a month on the satellite bill, it will be here.

20 Comments »

The Push For A Multi-Billion Gross, With Thousands Dead

superbadbush.jpg

5 Comments »

Apologies From Telluride

Interesting

5 Comments »

USA In Canada Today III

As I posted last week, USA Today continued and finished off its TIFF panel today.
And again, honored as I am to have been asked, I hate to leave 500 words of a little more perspective floating in my e-mail outbox or to repurpose them without acknowledging that they were inspired by USA Today’s request. So…
Friday Edition
Wrapping Up Toronto is surprisingly easy

The Toronto Wrap 1

In an internet driven era, full of fire and speed and the ultimate in misleadingly independent minded hype, the word “good” is similar to the word “neat,” as spoken to Madonna by Kevin Costner infamously in Truth or Dare. “Good” has no value to those who are desperately hungry to be “great.”
But before you start pointing fingers at the studios or the increasingly self-limiting domestic theatrical distribution system or The Great Unwashed, I would argue that we should look first at both our expectations and what filmmakers considered “indie” are actually making these days.

The rest…

16 Comments »

Home Again

Sometimes I forget that coming home is a group process with you all nearby…
Los Angeles didn’t change in the weeks I was gone on the fest circuit. Surprise!
I did come home to my three-pack of Fox Searchlight awards-bait movies. Not only can I listen to that song from Once over and over and over again (all in one viewing), but the packaging is smart looking at environmentally friendly. I would actually be thrilled to see every studio model their packaging on this packaging.
The first half on my Toronto wrap will be up in the morning.
I now feel the need to rev the awards season engines. 20 Weeks is just a few weeks away and Tuesday night is the first of the “didn’t see it in Toronto” screenings.
I have intended to write a piece about the Toronto premiere, Nothing Is Private, a very, very challenging film that is not the kiddie porn that some silly people wish to tag it as. Tomorrow is another day…
Of course, the first priority is to catch up on Curb Your Enthusiasm.
(P.S. Apologies to TWC for tagging them with the delayed and unhappy distribution of Mr. Woodcock in Saturday’s box office comments. It’s actually another bad experience that New Line can blame – unfairly – on Russell Schwartz.)

10 Comments »

Sunday Estimates by Klady – Sept 16

sunday0917.jpg

28 Comments »

Klady's Friday Estimates – Sept 14

fri0915.jpg
This will be Jodie Foster’s weakest mainstream opening of the last decade aside from 1999’s Anna & The King, which opened the week before Christmas, which is traditionally a grower slot, not a show-er slot. The question over at Warners will be whether they played this one right. The film is not actually “Death Wish With A Chick.” It is more complex than that. But how to sell more complex? More importantly, how do you sell to women, for whom Foster is an embodiment of power? Power is great, but do they really want to see her shoot bullets? After all, she is a strong woman in previous films who doesn’t end up firing the gun. Interesting.
Meanwhile, what is The Weinstein Co getting out of Mr. Woodcock? Damned near the same thing they got out of School For Scoundrels. Even The Bad News Bears didn’t open much better. Clearly there is an audience who wants to see Billy Bob Thornton hit people in the balls… but it is a specific and limited group. The difference with Bad Santa? It turned out to be a really good film. But at the start… similar numbers.
I guess someone knew Dragon Wars was opening… not me.
As for Across The Universe and Eastern Promises, you’re going to have to find more than 250 people per screening on fewer than 25 screens each to impress me that you have anything other than high profile talent that people have some interest in seeing.
The Taymor/Beatles film has some good ammunition in the Fab Four and the thumbed Ebert, who raved the film. I expect to see a lot of towns like Toronto, where the critic at one paper gave an absolute rave and the other nearly threatened to burn down the cinema. Sony has a challenge on its hands and whether the movie is actually good or bad (it’s both, actually) has little to do with it. Is there an audience that will pay to see a really complex, beautiful, star-free (domestically, at least… the stars of significance are mostly European) film… will the teen girls show up… or are they just going to wait for that DVD? I don’t get the feeling that this is MTV’s movie of the season… but then again, I have been in a country where MuchMusic dominates MTV for the last couple of weeks.
In the Valley of Elah is the sad story of the weekend, drawing fewer than 100 people per screening of the film on Friday. It is a film for adults, who are notoriously slow to get to the theater, so it will do a little better as the weekend progresses and perhaps over its run. But the must-see is dusty. Crash, by the way, opened on 1864 screens back in 2005. So comparisons are impossible.
I bow to the holding power of The Bourne Ultimatum.
And the quick death of Shoot ‘Em Up once again proves one of my favorite theories… The Geek 8. Unfortunately, this time it was The Geek 5.7. However, the film’s marketing never found a single reason for a woman or non-geek adult to show up for the film. And unless you are happy grossing under $20 million, you HAVE to find another segment, no matter how strong you feel in the geek universe. (I’d be curious to hear from AICNers about why they think that even the geeks didn’t show up in full force for this one.)

35 Comments »

Looking At Toronto 3

tiff3a.jpg
People aren’t exactly tip-toeing around 9/11 anymore, are they?
tiff3b.jpg
One of 3 such outdoor layouts of pirated DVDs on Spadina. The newest titles on Friday afternoon were last weekend’s releases.
By the way… the most popular running gag at TIFF this year was for audience members to cry out, “Arrrrrrrr” when the piracy warning was on screen before movies.
tiff3c.jpg
Kill Bill is “Still Ill” on the streets of Toronto.

10 Comments »

Box Office Hell – Sept 14

bohell0915.jpg

3 Comments »

Desperately Seeking Seeger

In spite a long (as in “from the beginning”) relationship with TIFF, the Michael Cohl produced doc, directed by Jim Brown, Pete Seeger: The Power of Song, a Weinstein Co release, was completed after Sundance and now, released in exclusive release in three cities before the end of TIFF ’07. So the only appearance of Pete Seeger at TIFF this year is in another Weinstein Co movie, Todd Haynes’ I’m Not There, in which Seeger goes nuts when Dylan goes electric.
I first wrote about the film last April after the film played Ebertfest. Roger gave the film a 4 star review in today’s Sun-Times.
And this from another Chicagoan…
“In this deeply touching and powerful documentary, we discover that Pete Seeger not only is the most influential folk singer in the world but is as American as apple pie – only more nutritious. This is the
first portrait of Pete the artist, the husband, the father and the most courageous of Americans. He hated bullies no mater how official they were and proved so during our most traumatic movements –
endangered freedom of speech and thought, civil rights and a civic environment.
Just remember – whoever or wherever you see a young guy or girl, with banjo, chest high, and singing freedom, Pete, like Kilroy, has been here.” — Studs Terkel

It would be nice for this film, so much of the moment, to find a place with ticket buyers this fall.

The Brave Directing One

2 Comments »

Sex As A Weapon

What struck me most about Ira Sachs

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon