The Hot Blog Archive for October, 2007

Lunch With David – Ang Lee

angleelwd.jpg
(Note: We have some sound problems… I suggest you turn down the sound on the iKlipz page as low as you can while using your computer sound to make it loud enough to hear… it balances the sound better than we have.)
“I don’t know why I want to make this movie. I don’t know why I can make this movie. I grew up as a pretty weak person. My body… my body was very fragile…very small… and shy… and cowardish… What gave me the strength to carry this movie… to carry it out? I’m not a genius. I just love making these movies. I’m haunted and consumed by those movies. Somehow, that’s how I connect to the world.”
Ang Lee
The interview

19 Comments »

Sunday Estimates by Klady – Oct 14

There has been a weekend like this in this October slot before, though by any historical standard, this was a strong weekend for mid-October. 2003

61 Comments »

Two Critics Walked Into A Cyber-Bar…

Todd McCarthy spoke to the issue of the current state of film criticism on Friday… and shockers, another Variety writer blames That Darn Web! He also takes on box office analysis, TV critics, and the newsweeklies.
I disagree on some, less on others, and wildly on a few.
I write: What publication instituted the bolded opening paragraph which offered the basic

26 Comments »

Heeeeeeere's Willie!

nothing2.gif

2 Comments »

Friday Estimates by Klady – Oct 12

fri1016.jpg
What’s the most interesting thing about the Top Five from Friday? They are exactly in reverse order of the number of theaters in which the films are playing.
That and that releasing three movies with the same demographic in the same weekend isn’t the best idea. It looks like the winner of the Serious Trio will be the one sold most as an action film with the most consistent box office star in the group, Wahlberg, and a popular actress showing cleavage.

28 Comments »

BYOB – October 12

After cracking 100 entries on the last one, perhaps a little more room to flex…

63 Comments »

Box Office Hell – October 12

bohell1012a.jpg
(updated friday 3:30p)

12 Comments »

Will The Academy Kill Lars

Word is that the AMPAS committee that sets official screenings has taken a pass on Lars & The Real Girl, the Toronto Film Fest phenom starring Oscar nominee Ryan Gosling. This call could well be the beginning of the end for any Best Picture Oscar hopes for this film, which gets a great reaction from audiences who see it and real resistance to the premise from people who have not. A poorly attended official Academy screening can be as bad as none at all… but for a small indie-level release, that foot in the door means a lot.
Of course, good box office momentum, starting with this weekend

45 Comments »

BYOB – October 10

anyone… anyone…

106 Comments »

12 "Questions" For Nikki Finke

ELLE: You are a powerful woman in Hollywood, Nikki. A lot of moguls there are scared of you.
ELLE: How do the male executives treat you? Do they think of you as a woman?
ELLE: Do you swear when you talk to them?
ELLE: Moron. I’ve seen you call them morons.
ELLE: When you write something incendiary, it does free up other reporters to follow you.
ELLE: What have you suffered?
ELLE: So that they can justify whatever

22 Comments »

THB – Wandering Into HD

Here is the column I wrote for today
But I wanted to add something for your consumption.
I go into this aware that someone (or two) will make this into an issue of my sense of entitlement. All I can do is to assure you that my interest is, for the most part, elsewhere in having this discussion.
I am not going to name people or studios, but another reason I am concerned for the future of Blu-ray and HD-DVD is that I have now had the experience at two studios with a fighting interest in the future of these technologies of trying to get software product (DVDs) to look at on the equipment in which I have already invested. I’m not looking for catalog product, just new releases that are being promoted with disc distribution now. And keep in mind, I have no problem getting normal DVDs when I request them.
Not only haven

19 Comments »

For The Record

Since Nikki Finke hasn’t bothered to report it or run it, someone should probably point out that Warner Bros denied the report Nikki made on her gossip blog outright to CBS News, stating, “Mr Robinov never made that statement nor is it his philosophy.”
Personally, I don’t really believe that the studio doesn’t feel burned by five box office dissapointments in one year with star actresses in the primary lead or that they will not cut back severely on the number of films made – especially expensive ones – with actresses in the lead… as every other studio in town has done for years.
But at the very least, an unequivocal statement by the studio should be given as much space as gossip run by Nikki.

11 Comments »

Redactarrhea

I don’t actually think the drama at the NYFF press conference for Brian de Palma’s Redacted was manufactured so we’d be talking about it. (Read and watch up on it on Movie City Indie.)
What I do think is that Magnolia has a very real problem with real life photos being used in a fictional motion picture that doesn’t have the cooperation of the people in the photos. And they have director who doesn’t choose to understand.
The most significant problem? De Palma has made a deeply mediocre movie that demonizes and stereotypes soldiers instead of the intended targets, the Iraq War and George Bush. And the 10 or so photos of real human desecration in Iraq at the end? It’s the only great drama in the film. But aside from the legal issues, it is cheap, lame, lazy drama that distracts from the film’s weak script and sends you out of the theater outraged for reasons that have nothing to do with DePalma’s skills behind the camera.
And if they stay, there likely will be a lawsuit because it underlines the offensive-to-me effort of DePalma to blur the line between truth (the photos) and fiction (the movie).
Do yourself a favor and find Nick Broomfield’s infintely superior Battle For Haditha, which tells the story of a massacre by America soldiers in an honest, honorable, and more realistic drama.

6 Comments »

Matching Shots…32 Years Apart

nicholsoncookoo.jpg
BEFORE
nicholsonbucket.jpg
BUCKET LIST (The Trailer)

12 Comments »

Heart Broken

The thing about a Farrelly Bros movie is that spoilers are still spoilers, but they generally are shock laughs, so there is no great loss in being spoiled. I guess I would prefer to see, say, There

54 Comments »

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon