Movie City News Archive for May, 2013

After Earth Yields Religious Parallels

After Earth Yields Religious Parallels

Read the full article »

A Former Member Of A World Religion Compares After Earth And Battlefield Earth

A Former Member Of A World Religion Compares After Earth And Battlefield Earth

Read the full article »

Google Says It Will Not Presently Allow Facial Recognition Software For Its Google Glass Product

Google Says It Will Not Presently Allow Facial Recognition Software For Its Google Glass Product

Read the full article »

Comeuppance For The Rich Big At The Movies In Mexico

Comeuppance For The Rich Big At The Movies In Mexico

Read the full article »

Buzz Aldrin Grounds After Earth

Buzz Aldrin Grounds After Earth

Read the full article »

Icahn Vs. Lionsgate From Two Years’ Distance

Icahn Vs. Lionsgate From Two Years’ Distance

Read the full article »

China Extras Line Up For Day Work

China Extras Line Up For Day Work

Read the full article »

“Daniel Radcliffe Acts His Age”

“Daniel Radcliffe Acts His Age”

Read the full article »

Pakistan Builds Multiplexes Even As Pirates Rule

Pakistan Builds Multiplexes Even As Pirates Rule

Read the full article »

The Room Turns 10 And Tommy Wiseau Is Gonna Celebrate In Westwood

The Room Turns 10 And Tommy Wiseau Is Gonna Celebrate In Westwood

Read the full article »

“Why Movies About Magicians Don’t Work”

“Why Movies About Magicians Don’t Work”

Read the full article »

“The 15 episodes of ‘Arrested Development,’ Season Four aren’t really episodes—or a season.”

“The 15 episodes of ‘Arrested Development,’ Season Four aren’t really episodes—or a season.”

Read the full article »

Governator Confirms He Will Be King Of More Sequels: Conan, Twins, Terminator

Governator Confirms He Will Be King Of More Sequels: Conan, Twins, Terminator

Read the full article »

Franca Rame, 84, Italian Playwright, Actress And Co-Clown With Nobelist Husband Dario Fo

Franca Rame, 84, Italian Playwright, Actress And Co-Clown With Nobelist Husband Dario Fo

Read the full article »

Why Yes, There Is A New David Lynch Film, And It Runs In An Eternal 7-Second Loop

Why Yes, There Is A New David Lynch Film, And It Runs In An Eternal 7-Second Loop

Read the full article »

Wilmington on Movies: Now You See Me

This new cinematic magic show—in which four professional magicians join for a Las Vegas-style super-act that may also be a super-crime—is a movie so self-consciously clever, so intent on surprising the hell out of us, and so utterly, shamelessly, mind-numbingly preposterous that you may walk out of it feeling that your mental pockets have been picked.

Read the full article »

Will Smith Lives For TED Talks

Will Smith Lives For TED Talks

Read the full article »

BusinessWeek On Prenda Law, The Porn Copyright Trolls

BusinessWeek On Prenda Law, The Porn Copyright Trolls

Read the full article »

Chicago Sun-Times Reporters Remanded To “iPhone Photography Basics” Camp Now That All The Photographers Have Been Fired

Chicago Sun-Times Reporters Remanded To “iPhone Photography Basics” Camp Now That The Photographers Have Been Fired

Read the full article »

Twilight Parodist Sues Lionsgate For $500 Million

Twilight Parodist Sues Lionsgate For $500 Million

Read the full article »

Movie City News

“I don’t think it’s cruel to say this, because John himself would undoubtedly have turned it into a gleeful anecdote: When he had the stroke that killed him, he was at a local dinner theater. Hell of a review.”

“I am inclined to aver that every activity needs its critics, from narcissists bloviating in Washington to exhibitors of knee holes in their blue jeans by way of following a fad. So, too, tennis players and others wearing their caps backward. There is, to be sure, only fairly innocuous folly in puncturing pants or reversing caps, but for political or artistic or religious twisting of thought or harboring holes in the head there is rather less excuse. I have always inveighed against the bleary journalism practiced by newspaper reviewers, as opposed to the real criticism performed by, well, critics.”

“I often felt a twinge of grief at the idea that John Simon had devoted his life to a method of work that could only make him increasingly unhappy. Here was a man, elegant, articulate, and vastly knowledgeable, fluent in at least half a dozen languages, whose gifts of mind gave nothing back to the arts he wrote about except a few unkind remarks that made fun of someone’s performance, ethnicity, physical attributes, or, with a pun, on his target’s name. (“If this is Norman Wisdom, I’ll take Saxon folly.”) Other theatre critics keep such darts in their rucksacks for occasional use; John lived by them.”

“One person’s critic is another person’s crackpot. That they are not united in their opinions is ascribable to the Latin saying: quot homines, tot sententiae. I myself prefer being considered a creep, but that is what you get for having what Vladimir Nabokov called ‘Strong Opinions.’ It is odd that in a country so wallowing in negativity, starting with mass shootings and climaxing with Trump, such an unimportant matter as theater criticism should generate so much hostility. The only target patently more important is lead in the drinking water.”

Review: Little Women (no spoilers)

The DVD Wrapup: Cold War, Betty Blue, Official Secrets, Demons, Olivia, American Dreamer, Land of Yik Yak

20 Weeks To Oscar: Cinema, Trump, and Oscar

E. Scott Weinberg On Youthful Fangoria Encounters

Rome Bookstore Closes

With a Grauniad-Alleged $300 Million Budget, Could The Yet-Unseen But Surely Weird Cats Pass A Billion Dollars at The Box Office?

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon