Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

From NYC to Sundance: Jeff Lipsky, 'Flannel Pajamas'


[This article is part of an ongoing series profiling New York films and filmmakers at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival. Click here for other features in the series.]
While a lot of Sundance competition features will likely find distribution in one form or another, only a handful go into the festival every year assured of not only distribution, but probably a bidding war. And if you had to place wagers on which film might manage the most spirited negotiation in 2006, you may as well go with the one written and directed by one of fathers of modern independent film distribution itself.
But do not bet on Jeff Lipsky’s relationship drama Flannel Pajamas just because he is hyper-connected from the days he released indies with John Cassavetes, New Yorker Films and his own companies October Films and Lot 47 Films. Bet on Pajamas because Lipsky really loves it.
“It’s very funny,” he told The Reeler last week. “Our production has hired a publicist. Our production has engaged the services of a sales representative, and I have been instructed in no uncertain terms to attend the festival and have a good time. This is the first time I will be attending the festival in absense of inhuman pressures that I always felt as a distributor. If I was not proud of my film, that would be another story. But I’m confident, not even so much in the film, but this really was a collaborative effort. I’ve got actors in this movie that are revelations. And they’re going to be there with me, and at the very least and my greatest pride will come for the recognition these people get. That might sound a little altruistic, but it’s absolutely true.”
Of course, nobody has actually seen this movie yet (“I swear to you on a stack of bibles,” Lipsky told me after I claimed this disadvantage in writing about it. “I will be carrying the first 35mm print to Sundance under my arm. I thought I would never have to do that, but that’s the truth.”), but that hasn’t stopped the buzz citing the film as an American heir to Bergman’s Scenes From a Marriage. As 30-something lovers in New York, Stuart (Justin Kirk) and Nicole (Julianne Nicholson) fall hard for each other and supposedly fall harder in their ensuing relationship. A native New Yorker himself, Lipsky attributed parts of the story to autobiography; other parts he attributed to that old, nagging “human condition.”
Somewhat miraculously, despite being one of Sundance’s quintessential grizzled veterans, his first festival “filmmaker” badge seemed to infuse Lipsky with a reborn, almost giddy burst of enthusiasm. “I’m trying not to sound too Pollyanna-ish, but it’s a completely new experience,” he said. “I truly am in the best sense of the word dazed and astounded at the attentiveness and the organization from the newset volunteer at the festival to the top organizers. I mean, it gives you real insight that this festival really is not just about the discovery of new filmmakers, but the nurturing of new filmmakers. Trying to lend as much inspiration on every level at every step of the process that they can. And as I say, you feel that not just from (festival bosses) Geoff Gilmore and John Cooper–you get it from everybody.”
Oh, Jesus–brownnosing from the top down. I’ll see your $10 million distribution deal and raise you a Grand Jury Prize. This must be Lipsky’s year.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon