Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

From NYC to Sundance: Paul Rachman and Steven Blush, 'American Hardcore'

[Ed. Note: For the next few days, The Reeler will present a series of profiles of some of the New York-based filmmakers with movies at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival. The subjects worked on various aspects of this year’s shorts, documentaries and features; their Sundance experience ranges from that of rookies to seasoned veterans to prize-winning alumni. Starting Jan. 19, The Reeler’s Sundance coverage will continue from Park City, Utah. — STV]

Paul Rachman had a feeling. The director had spent more than four years adapting writer Steven Blush’s 2000 punk survey American Hardcore as a documentary, and after submitting a rough cut for consideration in this year’s Sundance Film Festival, he found himself doing what thousands of other Sundance hopefuls do every fall: He waited.
And waited.
“Neither one of us really thought is was going to get into Sundance,” Rachman told The Reeler last week. “You know, you hear the rumors about people getting in; they hear weeks before the final, final deadline. They already know, but you haven’t heard, so you’re not in. I heard nothing from them. … You’ve got politics matched with a documentary about a subculture. I didn’t know if they were going to get it.”
Then Rachman received a voicemail last Novemeber while vacationing in the Dominican Republic: American Hardcore was set to screen in the documentary competition.
“What we figured out is that it’s almost a new chapter to the book almost–an addendum,” Blush said. “It’s like a counterpart. A book, in its essence, is delving into certain particular facts and the like. The film is an overview on the subculture. So while the basic premise that this was a tribal, regional, underground, early ’80s movement is consistent throughout, everything else is different. There are different interviews, there are some different people, and of course, there’s the visual element. So it’s a very different experience. But I’m very pleased with it; they should be a little different.”
Of Rachman’s three previous Sundance submissions, Hardcore is the first to make the cut. Not that he is any stranger to the event’s dynamic; as a founding filmmaker of the Slamdance Film Festival in 1995, Rachman helped to build Park City’s underground, strictly indie alternative to the burgeoning Sundance hype machine. As he wound down work on American Hardcore, which looked at the legacies of pioneering bands like Minor Threat, Bad Brains, D.O.A. and Black Flag, he knew it would be easy enough to screen it at Slamdance.
Of course, Rachman knew that would somewhat defeat both Hardcore‘s and Slamdance’s purposes. “The mission there is first-time filmmakers, films without a distributor and that discovery of talent,” Rachman said. “And while Slamdance might be the expected audience, Sundance is the less-expected audience. And that’s more challenging. And, you know, by not going to Slamdance, it really frees up the screening slot to a first-time filmmaker who deserves that slot.”
Judging from the film’s succession of sold-out screening dates, the challenge seems to have made its impact. “I’m just looking forward to having the opportunity to play this beyond the underground,” said Blush, a longtime musicologist making his film writing debut. “Bringing this to a larger audience–people who might not even know what this movement is. That’s what excites me–the chance to do that.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon